Volume 44, Issue 1

Industrial Location Modeling: Extending the Random Utility Framework*

Paulo Guimarães

Universidade do Minho and CEMPRE, 4710‐057 Braga, Portugal. E‐mail: paulog@eeg.uminho.pt

Search for more papers by this author
Octávio Figueiredo

Universidade do Porto and CEMPRE, 4200‐464 Porto, Portugal. E‐Mail: octavio@fep.up.pt

Search for more papers by this author
Douglas Woodward

3University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208. E‐mail: woodward@moore.sc.edu

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 February 2004
Citations: 83
* 

The research for this paper was conducted during a sabbatical leave by the two first authors at the Division of Research of the Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, and was partially supported by FCT, the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology.

Abstract

Abstract. Given sound theoretical underpinnings, the random utility maximization‐based conditional logit model (CLM) serves as the principal method for applied research on industrial location decisions. Studies that implement this methodology, however, confront several problems, notably the disadvantages of the underlying Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA) assumption. This paper shows that by taking advantage of an equivalent relation between the CLM and Poisson regression likelihood functions one can more effectively control for the potential IIA violation in complex choice scenarios where the decision maker confronts a large number of narrowly defined spatial alternatives. As demonstrated here our approach to the IIA problem is compliant with the random utility (profit) maximization framework.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.