Clinical Endocrinology

Volume 72, Issue 2

Hormonal therapy and sex reassignment: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of quality of life and psychosocial outcomes

Mohammad Hassan Murad

Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit

Division of Preventive Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mohamed B. Elamin

Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit

Search for more papers by this author
Magaly Zumaeta Garcia

Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit

Search for more papers by this author
Rebecca J. Mullan

Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit

Search for more papers by this author
Ayman Murad

Department of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier de Rouffach, France

Search for more papers by this author
Patricia J. Erwin

Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit

Mayo Clinic Libraries

Search for more papers by this author
Victor M. Montori

Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 January 2010
Cited by: 195
M. Hassan Murad, Division of Preventive Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. Tel.: (+1) 507 284 3097; Fax: (+1) 507‐284‐0909; E‐mail: Murad.Mohammad@mayo.edu

Summary

Objective To assess the prognosis of individuals with gender identity disorder (GID) receiving hormonal therapy as a part of sex reassignment in terms of quality of life and other self‐reported psychosocial outcomes.

Methods We searched electronic databases, bibliography of included studies and expert files. All study designs were included with no language restrictions. Reviewers working independently and in pairs selected studies using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted outcome and quality data. We used a random‐effects meta‐analysis to pool proportions and estimate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We estimated the proportion of between‐study heterogeneity not attributable to chance using the I2 statistic.

Results We identified 28 eligible studies. These studies enrolled 1833 participants with GID (1093 male‐to‐female, 801 female‐to‐male) who underwent sex reassignment that included hormonal therapies. All the studies were observational and most lacked controls. Pooling across studies shows that after sex reassignment, 80% of individuals with GID reported significant improvement in gender dysphoria (95% CI = 68–89%; 8 studies; I2 = 82%); 78% reported significant improvement in psychological symptoms (95% CI = 56–94%; 7 studies; I2 = 86%); 80% reported significant improvement in quality of life (95% CI = 72–88%; 16 studies; I2 = 78%); and 72% reported significant improvement in sexual function (95% CI = 60–81%; 15 studies; I2 = 78%).

Conclusions Very low quality evidence suggests that sex reassignment that includes hormonal interventions in individuals with GID likely improves gender dysphoria, psychological functioning and comorbidities, sexual function and overall quality of life.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.