The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire

J. A. D. B. CAMPOS

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara‐SP

Search for more papers by this author
A. C. CARRASCOSA

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Araraquara‐SP, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
J. MAROCO

ISPA, Instituto Universitário, Departamento de Estatística e Unidade de Investigação em Psicologia e Saúde, Lisboa, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 January 2012
Cited by: 10
João Maroco, Rua Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149‐041 Lisboa, Portugal. E‐mail: joao.maroco@ispa.pt

Abstract

Summary The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ) (Portuguese version). Face and content validity of the Portuguese version were performed. To assess reproducibility of the data gathered with MFIQ, it was applied to 62 individuals who completed the questionnaire on two occasions. Validity and reliability of the data gathered with MFIQ were evaluated in a sample of 249 patients. Construct‐related validity was assessed through factorial validity (by means of a confirmatory factor analysis), and convergent and discriminant validities were assessed, respectively, by the average variance extracted (AVE), composite reliability (CC) and bivariate correlations between factors. The internal consistency was estimated by the standardised Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α) and reproducibility by the intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC). All the items of MFIQ showed content validity. Reproducibility was excellent in both the ‘functional capacity’ dimension (D1) (ICCD1 = 0·895, 95% CI = 0·832 to 0·935) and the ‘feeding’ dimension (D2) (ICCD2 = 0·825, 95% CI = 0·726 to 0·891). Items 1, 2, 6 and 7 of D1 had factor weights below the desired cut‐off (0·5), and overall fit of the original bifactorial structure of the MFIQ was poor [(confirmatory fit index) CFI = 0·850, (goodness of fit index) GFI = 0·781, (root mean square error of approximation) RMSEA = 0·118]. Thus, these items were excluded, and the new, reduced version of the MFIQ showed good fit (CFI = 0·933, GFI = 0·879, RMSEA = 0·099). The convergent validity was adequate (AVE ≥ 0·5, CC ≥ 0·7) for both factors. However, their discriminant validity was low (AVED1  = 0·51 and AVED2 = 0·66 < ρ2D1D2 = 0·70). The internal consistency was excellent (αD1 = 0·874; αD2 = 0·918). The Portuguese version of the reduced MFIQ produced data with good validity and reliability.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 10

  • , Construction and validation of an questionnaire for evaluating self‐medication practised by patients with temporomandibular disorders, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 46, 5, (424-432), (2019).
  • , Effectiveness of mobilisation of the upper cervical region and craniocervical flexor training on orofacial pain, mandibular function and headache in women with TMD. A randomised, controlled trial, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 46, 2, (109-119), (2018).
  • , Cross‐cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia for temporomandibular disorders (TSK/TMD‐Br) into Brazilian Portuguese, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 44, 7, (500-510), (2017).
  • , Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 43, 8, (608-614), (2016).
  • , Effects of cervical mobilization and exercise on pain, movement and function in subjects with temporomandibular disorders: a single group pre-post test, Journal of Applied Oral Science, 10.1590/1678-775720150240, 24, 3, (188-197), (2016).
  • , The psychometric properties of self-report outcome measures in temporomandibular dysfunction, Physical Therapy Reviews, 19, 3, (174), (2014).
  • , Is there an association between anxiety/depression and temporomandibular disorders in college students?, Journal of Applied Oral Science, 22, 1, (15), (2014).
  • , Assessment of cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of self-report outcome measures in Portuguese relevant to temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review, Fisioterapia e Pesquisa, 21, 2, (107), (2014).
  • , Severity of temporomandibular disorders in women: validity and reliability of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index, Brazilian Oral Research, 28, 1, (16), (2014).
  • , Masticatory behaviour and chewing difficulties in young adults with temporomandibular disorders, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, , (2019).