The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds

ACHIM GATHMANN

Aachen University, Institute of Environmental Research, Chair of Ecology, Ecotoxicology and Ecochemistry, Worringerweg 1, 52062 Aachen,

Search for more papers by this author
LUDWIG A. HOTHORN

University of Hanover, Unit Biostatistics, Herrenhaeuser Str. 2, D‐30419 Hanover, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
DETLEF BARTSCH

Aachen University, Institute of Environmental Research, Chair of Ecology, Ecotoxicology and Ecochemistry, Worringerweg 1, 52062 Aachen,

Search for more papers by this author
INGOLF SCHUPHAN

Aachen University, Institute of Environmental Research, Chair of Ecology, Ecotoxicology and Ecochemistry, Worringerweg 1, 52062 Aachen,

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 June 2006
Cited by: 39
Achim Gathmann, Present address: Federal Agency of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Department Coexistence and GMO Monitoring, Taubenstr. 42/43, 10117 Berlin, Germany. Fax: +49‐01888‐4133060, E‐mail: achim.gathmann@bvl.bund.de

Abstract

Environmental risks of Bt maize, particularly pollen drift from Bt maize, were assessed for nontarget lepidopteran larvae in maize field margins. In our experimental approach, we carried out 3‐year field trials on 6 ha total. Three treatments were used in a randomized block design with eight replications resulting in 24 plots: (i) near‐isogenic control variety without insecticide (control), (ii) near‐isogenic control variety with chemical insecticide (Baytroid) and (iii) Bt maize expressing the recombinant toxin. We established a weed strip (20 × 1 m) in every plot consisting of a Chenopodium album (goosefoot)/Sinapis alba (mustard) mixture. In these strips we measured diversity and abundance of lepidopteran larvae during maize bloom and pollen shed. C. album hosted five species but all in very low densities; therefore data were not suitable for statistical analysis. S. alba hosted nine species in total. Most abundant were Plutella xylostella and Pieris rapae. For these species no differences were detected between the Bt treatment and the control, but the chemical insecticide treatment reduced larval abundance significantly. Conclusions regarding experimental methodology and results are discussed in regard to environmental risk assessment and monitoring of genetically modified organisms.

Number of times cited: 39

  • , Evaluation of the potential exposure of butterflies to genetically modified maize pollen in protected areas in Italy, Insect Science, 25, 4, (549-561), (2018).
  • , Where do uncertainties reside within environmental risk assessments? Testing UnISERA, a guide for uncertainty assessment, Environmental Pollution, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.065, 225, (390-402), (2017).
  • , Response to Kruse-Plass et al. (2017) regarding the risk to non-target lepidopteran larvae exposed to pollen from one or more of three Bt maize events (MON810, Bt11 and 1507), Environmental Sciences Europe, 29, 1, (2017).
  • , Ingestion of Bt corn pollen containing Cry1Ab/2Aj or Cry1Ac does not harm Propylea japonica larvae, Scientific Reports, 6, 1, (2016).
  • , Accumulation and variability of maize pollen deposition on leaves of European Lepidoptera host plants and relation to release rates and deposition determined by standardised technical sampling, Environmental Sciences Europe, 28, 1, (2016).
  • , Quality of laboratory studies assessing effects of Bt-proteins on non-target organisms: minimal criteria for acceptability, Transgenic Research, 25, 4, (395), (2016).
  • , Updating risk management recommendations to limit exposure of non‐target Lepidoptera of conservation concern in protected habitats to Bt‐maize pollen, EFSA Journal, 13, 7, (n/a-n/a), (2015).
  • , Potential exposure of butterflies in protected habitats by Bt maize cultivation: A case study in Switzerland, Biological Conservation, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.006, 192, (369-377), (2015).
  • , Scientific Opinion on an application from Pioneer Hi‐Bred International and Dow AgroSciences LLC (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2005‐23) for placing on the market of genetically modified maize 59122 for food and feed uses, import, processing and cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, EFSA Journal, 11, 3, (n/a-n/a), (2013).
  • , A Systematic Review of the Environmental Impacts of GM Crop Cultivation as Reported from 2006 to 2011, Food and Nutrition Sciences, 04, 06, (28), (2013).
  • , Randomly Detected Genetically Modified (GM) Maize (Zea mays L.) near a Transport Route Revealed a Fragile 45S rDNA Phenotype, PLoS ONE, 8, 9, (e74060), (2013).
  • , The influence of Bt-transgenic maize pollen on the bacterial diversity in the midgut of Apis mellifera ligustica, Apidologie, 44, 2, (198), (2013).
  • , International scientific Workshop “Non‐Target Organisms and Genetically Modified Crops: Assessing the effects of Bt proteins” (29–30 November 2012, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), EFSA Supporting Publications, 10, 9, (2013).
  • , Estimating the effects of Cry1F Bt‐maize pollen on non‐target Lepidoptera using a mathematical model of exposure, Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 1, (29-37), (2011).
  • , Effects of the cultivation of genetically modified Bt cropson no ntarget soil organisms, Microbial Ecology in Sustainable Agroecosystems, 10.1201/b12339-9, (153-227), (2012).
  • , Bt-maize event MON 88017 expressing Cry3Bb1 does not cause harm to non-target organisms, Transgenic Research, 21, 6, (1191), (2012).
  • , Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause notified by Greece on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC, EFSA Journal, 10, 9, (n/a-n/a), (2012).
  • , Scientific Opinion updating the evaluation of the environmental risk assessment and risk management recommendations on insect resistant genetically modified maize 1507 for cultivation, EFSA Journal, 9, 11, (n/a-n/a), (2011).
  • , Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐CZ‐2008‐54) for placing on the market of genetically modified insect resistant and herbicide tolerant maize MON 88017 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto, EFSA Journal, 9, 11, (n/a-n/a), (2011).
  • , The usefulness of a mathematical model of exposure for environmental risk assessment, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1708, (982), (2011).
  • , Monitoring of Bt-Maize pollen exposure in the vicinity of the nature reserve Ruhlsdorfer Bruch in northeast Germany 2007 to 2008, Environmental Sciences Europe, 22, 3, (229), (2010).
  • , A mathematical model of exposure of non-target Lepidoptera to Bt-maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab within Europe, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 1686, (1417), (2010).
  • , Scientific Opinion on the assessment of potential impacts of genetically modified plants on non‐target organisms, EFSA Journal, 8, 11, (2010).
  • , Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants, EFSA Journal, 8, 11, (2010).
  • , A synthesis of laboratory and field studies on the effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) maize on non‐target Lepidoptera, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 135, 2, (121-134), (2010).
  • , Applications (EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐MON810) for renewal of authorisation for the continued marketing of (1) existing food and food ingredients produced from genetically modified insect resistant maize MON810; (2) feed consisting of and/or containing maize MON810, including the use of seed for cultivation; and of (3) food and feed additives, and feed materials produced from maize MON810, all under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto, EFSA Journal, 7, 6, (2009).
  • , Case-specific monitoring of butterflies to determine potential effects of transgenic Bt-maize in Switzerland, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 131, 3-4, (137), (2009).
  • , Request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Austria on maize MON810 and T25 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC, EFSA Journal, 6, 12, (n/a-n/a), (2008).
  • , Request from the European Commission to review scientific studies related to the impact on the environment of the cultivation of maize Bt11 and 1507 ‐ Scientific opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms, EFSA Journal, 6, 10, (2008).
  • , Request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by France on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and the emergency measure according to Article 34 of Regulation(EC) No 1829/2003 ‐ Scientific opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms, EFSA Journal, 6, 10, (2008).
  • , Leaf surface factors of transgenic Bt cotton associated with the feeding behaviors of cotton aphids: A case study on non-target effects, Science in China Series C: Life Sciences, 51, 2, (145), (2008).
  • , Cultivation of genetically modified organisms: resource needs for monitoring adverse effects on biodiversity, Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 14, (3551), (2008).
  • , An evaluation of methods for assessing the impacts of Bt‐maize MON810 cultivation and pyrethroid insecticide use on Auchenorrhyncha (planthoppers and leafhoppers), Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10, 4, (331-339), (2008).
  • , Request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Hungary on maize MON810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC ‐ Scientific opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms, EFSA Journal, 6, 7, (2008).
  • , Nontarget Effect of Transgenic Insecticidal Crops: Overview to Date and Future Challenges., Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, 10.1303/jjaez.2007.165, 51, 3, (165-186), (2007).
  • , Clarifications of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms following a request from the Commission related to the opinions on insect resistant genetically modified Bt111 (Reference C/F/96/05.10) and 15072 (Reference C/ES/01/01) maize, EFSA Journal, 4, 11, (n/a-n/a), (2006).
  • , Opinion of the Scientific Panel on genetically modified organisms [GMO] related to the safeguard clause invoked by Greece according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and to Article 18 of Directive 2002/53/EC, EFSA Journal, 4, 11, (411), (2006).
  • , Spatial distribution ofAglais urticae(L.) and its host plantUrtica dioica(L.) in an agricultural landscape: implications forBtmaize risk assessment and post-market monitoring, Environmental Biosafety Research, 5, 1, (27), (2006).
  • , The Cultivation of Bt Corn Producing Cry1Ac Toxins Does Not Adversely Affect Non-Target Arthropods, PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0114228, 9, 12, (e114228), (2014).