Volume 9, Issue 9

Influence of stomatal distribution on transpiration in low‐wind environments

J. R. FOSTER

Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
W. K. SMITH

Corresponding Author

Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, U.S.A.

*Dr William K. Smith, Department of Botany, University of Wyoming. Laramie. Wyoming 82071. U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author
First published: December 1986
Citations: 21

Abstract

Abstract According to computer energy balance simulations of horizontal thin leaves, the quantitative effects of stomatal distribution patterns (top vs. bottom surfaces) on transpiration (E) were maximal for sunlit leaves with high stomatal conductances (gs) and experiencing low windspeeds (free or mixed convection regimes). E of these leaves decreased at windspeeds > 50 cm s−1, despite increases in the leaf‐to‐air vapour density deficit. At 50 cm s−1 wind‐speed, rapidly transpiring leaves had greater E when one‐half of the stomata were on each leaf surface (amphistomaty; 10.16 mmol H2O m−2 s−1) than when all stomata were on either the top (hyperstomaty; 9.34 mmol m−2s−1) or bottom (hypostomaty; 7.02 mmol m−2s−1) surface because water loss occurred in parallel from both surfaces. Hyperstomatous leaves had larger E than hypostomatous leaves because free convection was greater on the top than on the bottom surface. Transpiration of leaves with large g, was greatest at windspeeds near zero when ∼60–75% of the stomata were on the top surface, while at high windspeeds E was greatest with, 50% of the stomata on top. For leaves with low gs, stomatal distribution exerted little influence on simulated E values. Laboratory measurements of water loss from simulated hypo‐, hyper‐, and amphistomatous leaf models qualitatively supported these predictions.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 21

  • From one side to two sides: the effects of stomatal distribution on photosynthesis, New Phytologist, 10.1111/nph.16801, 0, 0, (2020).
  • Increased adaxial stomatal density is associated with greater mesophyll surface area exposed to intercellular air spaces and mesophyll conductance in diverse C4 grasses, New Phytologist, 10.1111/nph.16106, 225, 1, (169-182), (2019).
  • Improving water use efficiency by changing hydraulic and stomatal characteristics in soybean exposed to drought: the involvement of nitric oxide, Physiologia Plantarum, 10.1111/ppl.12983, 168, 3, (576-589), (2019).
  • tealeaves: an R package for modelling leaf temperature using energy budgets, AoB PLANTS, 10.1093/aobpla/plz054, 11, 6, (2019).
  • Is Amphistomy an Adaptation to High Light? Optimality Models of Stomatal Traits along Light Gradients, Integrative and Comparative Biology, 10.1093/icb/icz085, (2019).
  • Higher photosynthetic capacity from higher latitude: foliar characteristics and gas exchange of southern, central and northern populations of Populus angustifolia , Tree Physiology, 10.1093/treephys/tpv069, 35, 9, (936-948), (2015).
  • Leaf hydraulics II: Vascularized tissues, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.08.027, 340, (267-284), (2014).
  • Co-ordination of hydraulic and stomatal conductances across light qualities in cucumber leaves, Journal of Experimental Botany, 10.1093/jxb/err348, 63, 3, (1135-1143), (2011).
  • An investigation of sensible heat fluxes at a green roof in a laboratory setup, Building and Environment, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.03.006, 46, 9, (1851-1861), (2011).
  • A comparative study of the distribution and density of stomata in the British flora, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1994.tb00999.x, 52, 4, (377-393), (2008).
  • Environmental v. genetically driven variation in ecophysiological traits of Nothofagus pumilio from contrasting elevations, Australian Journal of Botany, 10.1071/BT06026, 55, 6, (585), (2007).
  • Simulated influence of altitude on photosynthetic CO2 uptake potential in plants, Plant, Cell & Environment, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01380.x, 14, 1, (133-136), (2006).
  • Buoyancy effect on forced convection in the leaf boundary layer, Plant, Cell & Environment, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01987.x, 13, 9, (965-970), (2006).
  • Leaf to Landscape, Photosynthetic Adaptation, 10.1007/0-387-27267-4_6, (133-168), (2004).
  • Leaf thickness of Salix spp. (Salicaceae) from the Athabasca sand dunes of northern Saskatchewan, Canada , Canadian Journal of Botany, 10.1139/b04-132, 82, 11, (1682-1686), (2004).
  • Leaf Form and Photosynthesis, BioScience, 10.2307/1313100, 47, 11, (785-793), (1997).
  • Water Relations of Cool‐Season Grasses, Cool‐Season Forage Grasses, undefined, (127-164), (1996).
  • The distribution of stomata, Stomata, 10.1007/978-94-011-0579-8, (12-35), (1996).
  • Energy balance analysis of nighttime leaf temperatures and frost formation in a subalpine environment, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 10.1016/0168-1923(94)90020-5, 71, 3-4, (359-372), (1994).
  • Ecophysiology of High Elevation Forests, Plant Biology of the Basin and Range, 10.1007/978-3-642-74799-1_4, (87-142), (1990).
  • Stomatal and photosynthetic responses during sun/shade transitions in subalpine plants: influence on water use efficiency, Oecologia, 10.1007/BF00377346, 74, 1, (62-67), (1987).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.