The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

METHODOLOGICAL REPORT

The Frailty Instrument for primary care of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe predicts mortality similarly to a frailty index based on comprehensive geriatric assessment

Roman Romero‐Ortuno

Corresponding Author

Department of Medical Gerontology, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Dr Roman Romero‐Ortuno PhD, Department of Medical Gerontology, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland. Email:

romeror@tcd.ie

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 September 2012
Cited by: 23

Abstract

Aim:  Frailty is an emerging concept in primary care, which potentially can provide healthcare commissioners with a clinical focus for targeting resources at an aging population. However, primary care practitioners need valid instruments that are easy to use. With that purpose in mind, we created a Frailty Instrument (FIt) for primary care based on the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). The aim of the present study was to compare the mortality prediction of the five‐item SHARE‐FIt with that of a 40‐item Frailty Index (FIx) based on comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).

Methods:  The participants were 15 578 women and 12 783 men from the first wave of SHARE. A correspondence analysis was used to assess the degree of agreement between phenotypic classifications. The ability of the continuous frailty measures (FIt score and FIx) to predict mortality (mean follow up of 2.4 years) was compared using receiver–operating characteristic (ROC) plots and areas under the curve (AUC).

Results:  In both sexes, there was significant correspondence between phenotypic categories. The two continuous measures performed equally well as mortality predictors (women: AUC‐FIx = 0.79, 95% CI 0.75–0.82, P < 0.001; AUC‐FIt = 0.77, 95% CI 0.73–0.81, P < 0.001; men: AUC‐FIx = 0.77, 95% CI 0.74–0.79, P < 0.001; AUC‐FIt = 0.76, 95% CI 0.74–0.79, P < 0.001). Their equivalent performance was confirmed by statistical comparisons of the AUC.

Conclusions:  SHARE‐FIt is simpler and more usable, and predicts mortality similarly to a more complex FIx based on CGA. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2013; 13: 497–504.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 23

  • , The effectiveness of a coordinated preventive care approach for healthy ageing (UHCE) among older persons in five European cities: A pre-post controlled trial, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.006, 88, (153-162), (2018).
  • , The association between personal income and aging: A population-based 13-year longitudinal study, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 10.1016/j.archger.2017.01.002, 70, (76-83), (2017).
  • , Evaluation design of Urban Health Centres Europe (UHCE): preventive integrated health and social care for community-dwelling older persons in five European cities, BMC Geriatrics, 10.1186/s12877-017-0606-1, 17, 1, (2017).
  • , Frailty phenotype and the role of levodopa challenge test in geriatric inpatients with mild parkinsonian signs, Biogerontology, 18, 4, (641), (2017).
  • , Physical Fitness and Frailty Syndrome in Institutionalized Older Women, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 124, 4, (754), (2017).
  • , 7 Frailty, Geriatric Rehabilitation, 10.1201/9781315373904-8, (129-142), (2017).
  • , Frailty, Sarcopenia, Falls and Fractures, Orthogeriatrics, 10.1007/978-3-319-43249-6_4, (47-61), (2016).
  • , A Comparison of Two Mouse Frailty Assessment Tools, The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 10.1093/gerona/glx009, 72, 7, (904-909), (2017).
  • , Mini dental assessment: a simple screening test for non-dental staff, Clinical Oral Investigations, 21, 5, (1457), (2017).
  • , Frailty and cardiac rehabilitation: A call to action from the EAPC Cardiac Rehabilitation Section, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 10.1177/2047487316682579, 24, 6, (577-590), (2016).
  • , Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review, BMC Geriatrics, 10.1186/s12877-016-0225-2, 16, 1, (2016).
  • , Screening for frailty: older populations and older individuals, Public Health Reviews, 10.1186/s40985-016-0021-8, 37, 1, (2016).
  • , Factors associated with frailty in primary care: a prospective cohort study, BMC Geriatrics, 16, 1, (2016).
  • , Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review, European Journal of Internal Medicine, 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007, 31, (3-10), (2016).
  • , Walking Speed: A Summary Indicator of Frailty?, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16, 8, (635), (2015).
  • , Modifications to the frailty phenotype criteria: Systematic review of the current literature and investigation of 262 frailty phenotypes in the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe, Ageing Research Reviews, 21, (78), (2015).
  • , Frail elderly people: Detection and management in primary care, European Geriatric Medicine, 10.1016/j.eurger.2015.05.014, 6, 5, (447-455), (2015).
  • , Men's Health Index: A Pragmatic Approach to Stratifying and Optimizing Men's Health, Korean Journal of Urology, 55, 11, (710), (2014).
  • , Association between nutritional status (MNA®-SF) and frailty (SHARE-FI) in acute hospitalised elderly patients, The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 18, 3, (264), (2014).
  • , Operationalization of Frailty Using Eight Commonly Used Scales and Comparison of Their Ability to Predict All‐Cause Mortality, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61, 9, (1537-1551), (2013).
  • , Quality of Life in Sarcopenia and Frailty, Calcified Tissue International, 93, 2, (101), (2013).
  • , Multicomponent Frailty Assessment Tools for Older People with Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, , (2018).
  • , Fragilidade física e desempenho cognitivo em populações idosas, parte I: revisão sistemática com metanálise, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 10.1590/1413-81232018241.03692017, 24, 1, (203-218), (2019).