The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Evaluation of transcranial magnetic stimulation for investigating transmission in descending motor tracts in the rat

J. B. Nielsen

Division of Neurophysiology, Department of Medical Physiology, the Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark

Institute of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
M. A. Perez

Division of Neurophysiology, Department of Medical Physiology, the Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
M. Oudega

International Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Kennedy Krieger Institute and the Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
M. Enriquez‐Denton

UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
J.‐M. Aimonetti

Equipe Perception et contrôle du mouvement humain, Université de Provence CNRS, Marseille, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 February 2007
Cited by: 23
Professor J. B. Nielsen, 1Division of Neurophysiology, as above.
E‐mail: j.b.nielsen@mfi.ku.dk

Abstract

In the rat, non‐invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has shown promise for evaluation of transmission through the spinal cord before and after repair strategies, but it is still unclear which pathways are activated by TMS. The aim of the present study was therefore to identify these pathways and to analyse the effect of TMS on spinal neurons. In 19 rats, TMS evoked responses bilaterally in forelimb (biceps brachii; BB) and hindlimb muscles (tibialis anterior). The latency and amplitude of these motor‐evoked responses (MEPs) were highly variable and depended strongly on the coil position and the stimulation intensity. The most frequently observed latencies for the BB MEPs could be divided into three groups: 3–6 ms, 8–12 ms and 14–18 ms. Lesions in the dorsal columns, which destroyed the corticospinal tract at C2 and C5, significantly depressed MEPs in the mid‐ and high‐latency ranges, but not those in the low‐latency range. Lesions in the dorsolateral funiculus, which interrupted the rubrospinal tract, had no effect on MEPs in any of the latency ranges. By contrast, bilateral lesion of the reticulospinal tract and other ventro‐laterally located descending pathways abolished all responses. Intracellular recordings from 54 cervical motoneurons in five rats revealed that TMS evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) at latencies that corresponded well with those of the BB MEPs. The short‐latency EPSPs had rise times of around 1 ms, suggesting that they were mediated by a monosynaptic pathway. EPSPs with longer latencies had considerably longer rise times, which indicated conduction through polysynaptic pathways. Selective electrical stimulation of the pyramidal tract in the brainstem was performed in seven rats, where intracellular recordings from 70 motoneurons revealed that the earliest EPSPs and MEPs evoked by TMS were not mediated by the corticospinal tract, but by other descending motor pathways. Together, these results showed that in the rat TMS activates several descending pathways that converge on common spinal interneurons and motoneurons. Our observations confirm that the corticospinal tract has weak (and indirect) projections to cervical spinal motoneurons.

Number of times cited: 23

  • , Increased threshold of short-latency motor evoked potentials in transgenic mice expressing Channelrhodopsin-2, PLOS ONE, 12, 5, (e0178803), (2017).
  • , Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) responses elicited in hindlimb muscles as an assessment of synaptic plasticity in spino-muscular circuitry after chronic spinal cord injury, Neuroscience Letters, 642, (37), (2017).
  • , Preclinical and Clinical Evidence on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Projections: Implication for Motor Recovery, Translational Stroke Research, 8, 6, (529), (2017).
  • , Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord, Journal of Neurophysiology, 117, 3, (1143), (2017).
  • , Lifting the veil on the dynamics of neuronal activities evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation, eLife, 6, (2017).
  • , Combined motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promotes corticospinal system functional and structural plasticity and motor function after injury, Experimental Neurology, 277, (46), (2016).
  • , Interhemispheric Inhibition Measurement Reliability in Stroke: A Pilot Study, Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 19, 8, (838), (2016).
  • , Motor Cortex and Motor Cortical Interhemispheric Communication in Walking After Stroke, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 30, 1, (94), (2016).
  • , Longitudinal Evaluation of Residual Cortical and Subcortical Motor Evoked Potentials in Spinal Cord Injured Rats, Journal of Neurotrauma, 10.1089/neu.2015.4140, 33, 10, (907-916), (2016).
  • , Pronounced species divergence in corticospinal tract reorganization and functional recovery after lateralized spinal cord injury favors primates, Science Translational Medicine, 7, 302, (302ra134), (2015).
  • , Functional Dopaminergic Neurons in Substantia Nigra are Required for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Motor Plasticity, Cerebral Cortex, 25, 7, (1806), (2015).
  • , Solving the Orientation Specific Constraints in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation by Rotating Fields, PLoS ONE, 9, 2, (e86794), (2014).
  • , Corticospinal reorganization after spinal cord injury, The Journal of Physiology, 590, 16, (3647), (2012).
  • , Repetitive spinal electromagnetic stimulation opens a window of synaptic plasticity in damaged spinal cord: role of NMDA receptors, Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 11, (3027), (2012).
  • , Translational Neuromodulation: Approximating Human Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocols in Rats, Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 15, 4, (296-305), (2012).
  • , Measures of Cortical Inhibition by Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Anesthetized Rats, Journal of Neurophysiology, 105, 2, (615), (2011).
  • , Assessment of motor pathways by magnetic stimulation in human and veterinary medicine, The Veterinary Journal, 187, 2, (174), (2011).
  • , Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound, Nature Protocols, 6, 9, (1453), (2011).
  • , Lateralization of forelimb motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in rats, Clinical Neurophysiology, 121, 1, (104), (2010).
  • , Brain transcranial direct current stimulation modulates motor excitability in mice, European Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 4, (704), (2010).
  • , The relationship between lamotrigine concentration and change in resting motor threshold in a rodent model of motor cortex stimulation, Epilepsy Research, 83, 2-3, (103), (2009).
  • , Electrophysiological actions of the rubrospinal tract in the anaesthetised rat, Experimental Neurology, 212, 1, (118), (2008).
  • , Motor cortex electrical stimulation augments sprouting of the corticospinal tract and promotes recovery of motor function, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 10.3389/fnint.2014.00051, 8, (2014).