The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Free Access

A pilot phase‐II prospective study to test the ‘efficacy’ and tolerability of a penile‐extender device in the treatment of ‘short penis’

Paolo Gontero

Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Urologia 1, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Massimiliano Di Marco

Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Urologia 1, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Gianluca Giubilei

Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Urologia 1, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Riccardo Bartoletti

Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Urologia 1, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giovanni Pappagallo

Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Urologia 1, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Alessandro Tizzani

Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Urologia 1, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Nicola Mondaini

Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Urologia 1, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 February 2009
Cited by: 26
Paolo Gontero, Senior Lecturer and Consultant Urologist, Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, University of Turin, Urologia 1, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, C.so Dogliotti, 14, Torino, Italy. e‐mail: paolo.gontero@unito.it

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess a commonly marketed brand of penile extender, the Andro‐Penis® (Andromedical, Madrid, Spain), widely used devices which aim to increase penile size, in a phase II single‐arm study powered to detect significant changes in penile size, as despite their widespread use, there is little scientific evidence to support their potential clinical utility in the treatment of patients with inadequate penile dimensions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients were required to test the efficacy of the device, assuming an effect size of >0.8. Eligible patients were counselled how to use the penile extender for at least 4 h/day for 6 months. Penile dimensions were measured at baseline and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (end of study). The erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of EF was administered at baseline and at the end of the study. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using an institutional unvalidated five‐item questionnaire.

RESULTS

After 6 months the mean gain in length was significant, meeting the goals of the effect size, at 2.3 and 1.7 cm for the flaccid and stretched penis, respectively. No significant changes in penile girth were detected. The EF domain scores improved significantly at the end of study. Treatment satisfaction scores were consistent with acceptable to good improvement in all items, except for penile girth, where the score was either ‘no change’ or ‘mild improvement’.

CONCLUSIONS

Penile extenders should be regarded as a minimally invasive and effective treatment option to elongate the penile shaft in patients seeking treatment for a short penis.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 26

  • , Penile Girth Enlargement Strategies: What’s the Evidence?, Sexual Medicine Reviews, 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.11.003, (2019).
  • , Intimchirurgie beim Mann, Intimchirurgie, 10.1007/978-3-662-57392-1_5, (49-68), (2019).
  • , Comment je prescris un stretching de verge par traction thérapie (Andropenis ® ) ?, Progrès en Urologie - FMC, 27, 4, (F80), (2017).
  • , Penile Lengthening, Girth, and Size Preservation at the Time of Penile Prosthesis Insertion, Sexual Medicine Reviews, 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.11.005, 5, 3, (403-412), (2017).
  • , Penile Improvement Protocol in Postoperative Management of Patients Undergoing Metoidioplasty, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 40, 6, (947), (2016).
  • , Evidence-Based Management Guidelines on Peyronie's Disease, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.062, 13, 6, (905-923), (2016).
  • , Ästhetisch-plastische Eingriffe am Penis, Die Urologie, 10.1007/978-3-642-39940-4_18, (1461-1469), (2016).
  • , Perceptions about penis size among supposedly healthy 40 to 60-year-old Brazilian men: a cross-sectional pilot study, Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 133, 2, (84), (2015).
  • , Sexual Functioning and Behavior of Men with Body Dysmorphic Disorder Concerning Penis Size Compared with Men Anxious about Penis Size and with Controls: A Cohort Study, Sexual Medicine, 3, 3, (147-155), (2015).
  • , Penile Dysmorphic Disorder: Development of a Screening Scale, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 8, (2311), (2015).
  • , Comment On: Applying Extender Devices in Patients with Penile Dysmorphophobia: Assessment of Tolerability, Efficacy, and Impact on Erectile Function, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 5, (1248-1248), (2015).
  • , Applying Extender Devices in Patients with Penile Dysmorphophobia: Assessment of Tolerability, Efficacy, and Impact on Erectile Function, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 5, (1242-1247), (2015).
  • , Phenomenology of men with body dysmorphic disorder concerning penis size compared to men anxious about their penis size and to men without concerns: A cohort study, Body Image, 13, (53), (2015).
  • , Beliefs about Penis Size: Validation of a Scale for Men Ashamed about Their Penis Size, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 1, (84-92), (2013).
  • , Penile traction therapy and Peyronie’s disease: a state of art review of the current literature, Therapeutic Advances in Urology, 5, 1, (59), (2013).
  • , Position Paper: Management of Men Complaining of a Small Penis Despite an Actually Normal Size, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10, 1, (294-303), (2012).
  • , Therapeutic strategies for patients with micropenis or penile dysmorphic disorder, Nature Reviews Urology, 9, 9, (499), (2012).
  • , A Retrospective Comparative Study of Traction Therapy vs. No Traction Following Tunica Albuginea Plication or Partial Excision and Grafting for Peyronie's Disease: Measured Lengths and Patient Perceptions, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 9, (2396-2403), (2012).
  • , Non‐invasive methods of penile lengthening: fact or fiction?, BJU International, 107, 8, (1278-1282), (2010).
  • , Effect of Penile‐Extender Device in Increasing Penile Size in Men with Shortened Penis: Preliminary Results, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 11, (3188-3192), (2010).
  • , Traction Therapy for Men with Shortened Penis Prior to Penile Prosthesis Implantation: A Pilot Study, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 7, (2112-2117), (2011).
  • , Revision of Penile Prosthesis Surgery after Use of Penile Traction Therapy to Increase Erect Penile Length: Case Report and Review of the Literature, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 2, (607-611), (2010).
  • , Trauma, Gender Reassignment, and Penile Augmentation, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 4pt2, (1657-1667), (2010).
  • , The status of penile enhancement procedures, Current Opinion in Urology, 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283318f31, 16, 6, (601-605), (2009).
  • , Penile shortening after radical prostatectomy and Peyronie’s surgery, Current Urology Reports, 10.1007/s11934-009-0074-z, 10, 6, (468-474), (2009).
  • , Postoperative vacuum therapy following AMS™ LGX 700® inflatable penile prosthesis placement: penile dimension outcomes and overall satisfaction, International Journal of Impotence Research, 10.1038/s41443-019-0125-z, (2019).