The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?
Abstract
In order to update candidate evaluations voters must acquire information and determine whether that new information supports or opposes their candidate expectations. Normatively, new negative information about a preferred candidate should result in a downward adjustment of an existing evaluation. However, recent studies show exactly the opposite; voters become more supportive of a preferred candidate in the face of negatively valenced information. Motivated reasoning is advanced as the explanation, arguing that people are psychologically motivated to maintain and support existing evaluations. Yet it seems unlikely that voters do this ad infinitum. To do so would suggest continued motivated reasoning even in the face of extensive disconfirming information. In this study we consider whether motivated reasoning processes can be overcome simply by continuing to encounter information incongruent with expectations. If so, voters must reach a tipping point after which they begin more accurately updating their evaluations. We show experimental evidence that such an affective tipping point does in fact exist. We also show that as this tipping point is reached, anxiety increases, suggesting that the mechanism that generates the tipping point and leads to more accurate updating may be related to the theory of affective intelligence. The existence of a tipping point suggests that voters are not immune to disconfirming information after all, even when initially acting as motivated reasoners.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited: 100
- Joshua Robison, Thomas J. Leeper and James N. Druckman, Do Disagreeable Political Discussion Networks Undermine Attitude Strength?, Political Psychology, 39, 2, (479-494), (2016).
- Elizabeth Suhay and Cengiz Erisen, The Role of Anger in the Biased Assimilation of Political Information, Political Psychology, 39, 4, (793-810), (2018).
- Carl L. Palmer, Caught in the crossfire: the competing influence of outcome and beneficiary cues on perceptions of antipoverty spending, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6, 1, (95), (2018).
- Cengiz Erisen, David P. Redlawsk and Elif Erisen, Complex Thinking as a Result of Incongruent Information Exposure, American Politics Research, 46, 2, (217), (2018).
- Cengiz Erisen, Theory of Emotions, Political Behavior and the Emotional Citizen, 10.1057/978-1-137-58705-3_3, (47-76), (2017).
- Pavlos Vasilopoulos, George E. Marcus and Martial Foucault, Emotional Responses to the Charlie Hebdo Attacks: Addressing the Authoritarianism Puzzle, Political Psychology, 39, 3, (557-575), (2017).
- James S. Bowman, Thinking about Thinking: Beyond Decision-Making Rationalism and the Emergence of Behavioral Ethics, Public Integrity, (1), (2018).
- Pavlos Vasilopoulos, Terrorist events, emotional reactions, and political participation: the 2015 Paris attacks, West European Politics, 41, 1, (102), (2018).
- Stephen M. Utych, Negative Affective Language in Politics, American Politics Research, 46, 1, (77), (2018).
- GUY GROSSMAN and KRISTIN MICHELITCH, Information Dissemination, Competitive Pressure, and Politician Performance between Elections: A Field Experiment in Uganda, American Political Science Review, (1), (2018).
- Mica R. Endsley, Combating Information Attacks in the Age of the Internet: New Challenges for Cognitive Engineering, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 10.1177/0018720818807357, 60, 8, (1081-1094), (2018).
- Jessica Trounstine, , (2018)., Segregation by Design
- Loren Collingwood, Nazita Lajevardi and Kassra A. R. Oskooii, A Change of Heart? Why Individual-Level Public Opinion Shifted Against Trump’s “Muslim Ban”, Political Behavior, 10.1007/s11109-017-9439-z, 40, 4, (1035-1072), (2018).
- Eugenia Ha Rim Rho, Gloria Mark and Melissa Mazmanian, Fostering Civil Discourse Online, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 10.1145/3274416, 2, CSCW, (1-28), (2018).
- Josh Pasek, It’s not my consensus: Motivated reasoning and the sources of scientific illiteracy, Public Understanding of Science, 10.1177/0963662517733681, 27, 7, (787-806), (2017).
- D.J. Flynn, Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler, The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics, Political Psychology, 38, S1, (127-150), (2017).
- Natalie Jomini Stroud and Sohyun Choi, Selective Perception and Retention, The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, (1-10), (2017).
- Joan Barceló, The Emotional Underpinnings of Attitudes toward Transitional Justice, Political Studies, (003232171772350), (2017).
- Katherine J. Cramer and Benjamin Toff, The Fact of Experience: Rethinking Political Knowledge and Civic Competence, Perspectives on Politics, 15, 03, (754), (2017).
- Paul Harvey, Mark J. Martinko and Nancy Borkowski, Justifying Deviant Behavior: The Role of Attributions and Moral Emotions, Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 4, (779), (2017).
- J. Benjamin Taylor, A Deep Dive into Extreme Television Media Selection, Extreme Media and American Politics, 10.1007/978-3-319-41183-5_2, (29-54), (2016).
- Hyunjin Song, Why Do People (Sometimes) Become Selective About News? The Role of Emotions and Partisan Differences in Selective Approach and Avoidance, Mass Communication and Society, 20, 1, (47), (2017).
- Aaron Dusso, Democratic Demands and Citizen Capabilities, Personality and the Challenges of Democratic Governance, 10.1007/978-3-319-53603-3_1, (1-38), (2017).
- Emily K. Vraga, Which Candidates Can Be Mavericks? The Effects of Issue Disagreement and Gender on Candidate Evaluations, Politics & Policy, 45, 1, (4-30), (2017).
- Aaron Dusso, Personality’s Role in Shaping Civic Aptitude, Personality and the Challenges of Democratic Governance, 10.1007/978-3-319-53603-3_6, (129-147), (2017).
- Freddie J. Jennings, Calvin R. Coker, Mitchell S. McKinney and Benjamin R. Warner, Tweeting Presidential Primary Debates: Debate Processing Through Motivated Twitter Instruction, American Behavioral Scientist, 61, 4, (455), (2017).
- Ian G. Anson, “That’s not how it works”: economic indicators and the construction of partisan economic narratives, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27, 2, (213), (2017).
- Mark R. Joslyn and Steven M. Sylvester, The Determinants and Consequences of Accurate Beliefs About Childhood Vaccinations, American Politics Research, (1532673X1774534), (2017).
- Tai-Quan Peng, Guodao Sun, Yingcai Wu and Alejandro Raul Hernandez Montoya, Interplay between Public Attention and Public Emotion toward Multiple Social Issues on Twitter, PLOS ONE, 12, 1, (e0167896), (2017).
- Matthew T. Pietryka, Jack Lyons Reilly, Daniel M. Maliniak, Patrick R. Miller, Robert Huckfeldt and Ronald B. Rapoport, From Respondents to Networks: Bridging Between Individuals, Discussants, and the Network in the Study of Political Discussion, Political Behavior, (2017).
- Richard K. Herrmann, How Attachments to the Nation Shape Beliefs About the World: A Theory of Motivated Reasoning, International Organization, 71, S1, (S61), (2017).
- Bradley T. Dickerson and Heather L. Ondercin, Conditional Motivated Reasoning, Political Research Quarterly, 70, 1, (194), (2017).
- Ozan Kuru, Josh Pasek and Michael W. Traugott, Motivated Reasoning in the Perceived Credibility of Public Opinion Polls, Public Opinion Quarterly, 81, 2, (422), (2017).
- Hartmut Fünfgeld, Institutional Tipping Points in Organizational Climate Change Adaptation Processes, Journal of Extreme Events, 04, 01, (1750002), (2017).
- Carlos Brenes Peralta, Magdalena Wojcieszak, Yphtach Lelkes and Claes de Vreese, Selective Exposure to Balanced Content and Evidence Type: The Case of Issue and Non-Issue Publics About Climate Change and Health Care, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 10.1177/1077699016654681, 94, 3, (833-861), (2016).
- Douglas R. Pierce, David P. Redlawsk and William W. Cohen, Social Influences on Online Political Information Search and Evaluation, Political Behavior, 10.1007/s11109-016-9374-4, 39, 3, (651-673), (2016).
- Maria Preißinger and Harald Schoen, It's not always the campaign – Explaining inter-election switching in Germany, 2009–2013, Electoral Studies, 44, (109), (2016).
- Luke Greenacre, Sarah Patrick, Rongbin Yang, Victoria Jaeger and James Martin, Correcting misperceptions about stigmatized ingredients: MSG, Food Quality and Preference, 48, (93), (2016).
- Joanne M. Miller, Kyle L. Saunders and Christina E. Farhart, Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust, American Journal of Political Science, 60, 4, (824-844), (2015).
- Patrick C. Meirick, Motivated Reasoning, Accuracy, and Updating in Perceptions of Bush's Legacy*, Social Science Quarterly, 97, 3, (699-713), (2016).
- Matthew T. Pietryka, Accuracy Motivations, Predispositions, and Social Information in Political Discussion Networks, Political Psychology, 37, 3, (367-386), (2015).
- Jeremiah Garretson and Elizabeth Suhay, Scientific Communication about Biological Influences on Homosexuality and the Politics of Gay Rights, Political Research Quarterly, 69, 1, (17), (2016).
- Bradley Dickerson, Economic Perceptions, Presidential Approval, and Causality, American Politics Research, 44, 6, (1037), (2016).
- Lindsey C. Levitan and Brad Verhulst, Conformity in Groups: The Effects of Others’ Views on Expressed Attitudes and Attitude Change, Political Behavior, 38, 2, (277), (2016).
- Justin O. Parkhurst, Appeals to evidence for the resolution of wicked problems: the origins and mechanisms of evidentiary bias, Policy Sciences, 10.1007/s11077-016-9263-z, 49, 4, (373-393), (2016).
- David Lynn Painter and Tom Vizcarrondo, Campaign Advertising in Florida’s 2014 Gubernatorial Election: Candidate Images, Voter Enthusiasm, and Partisanship, Communication and Midterm Elections, 10.1057/9781137488015_12, (209-224), (2016).
- Shira Dvir Gvirsman, Testing Our Quasi‐Statistical Sense: News Use, Political Knowledge, and False Projection, Political Psychology, 36, 6, (729-747), (2014).
- Kevin J. Mullinix, Presidential Debates, Partisan Motivations, and Political Interest, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 45, 2, (270-288), (2015).
- Robert N. Lupton, Shane P. Singh and Judd R. Thornton, The Moderating Impact of Social Networks on the Relationships Among Core Values, Partisanship, and Candidate Evaluations, Political Psychology, 36, 4, (399-414), (2014).
- Paul Thibodeau, Matthew M. Peebles, Daniel J. Grodner and Frank H. Durgin, The Wished‐For Always Wins Until the Winner Was Inevitable All Along: Motivated Reasoning and Belief Bias Regulate Emotion During Elections, Political Psychology, 36, 4, (431-448), (2013).
- Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler, The Effect of Fact‐Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on U.S. State Legislators, American Journal of Political Science, 59, 3, (628-640), (2014).
- Brian E. Weeks, Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation, Journal of Communication, 65, 4, (699-719), (2015).
- Douglas R. Pierce, Uninformed Votes? Reappraising Information Effects and Presidential Preferences, Political Behavior, 37, 3, (537), (2015).
- Kevin J. Mullinix, Thomas J. Leeper, James N. Druckman and Jeremy Freese, The Generalizability of Survey Experiments, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2, 02, (109), (2015).
- Elizabeth Suhay, James N. Druckman, Patrick W. Kraft, Milton Lodge and Charles S. Taber, Why People “Don’t Trust the Evidence”, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 1, (121), (2015).
- Paul Harvey and Marie T. Dasborough, Entitled to solutions: The need for research on workplace entitlement, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 3, (460-465), (2015).
- Andrea Ceron and Vincenzo Memoli, Trust in Government and Media Slant, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20, 3, (339), (2015).
- Leticia Bode and Emily K. Vraga, In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media, Journal of Communication, 65, 4, (619-638), (2015).
- Christopher D. Johnston, Howard Lavine and Benjamin Woodson, Emotion and Political Judgment, Political Research Quarterly, 68, 3, (474), (2015).
- Daniel Stevens, Barbara Allen, John Sullivan and Eric Lawrence, Fair's Fair? Principles, Partisanship, and Perceptions of the Fairness of Campaign Rhetoric, British Journal of Political Science, 45, 01, (195), (2015).
- Aaron Dusso, Incorrect voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election: How partisan and economic cues fail to help low-information voters, Electoral Studies, 37, (50), (2015).
- Alberto Mirisola, Michele Roccato, Silvia Russo, Giulia Spagna and Alessio Vieno, Societal Threat to Safety, Compensatory Control, and Right‐Wing Authoritarianism, Political Psychology, 35, 6, (795-812), (2013).
- Thomas J. Leeper and Rune Slothuus, Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation, Political Psychology, 35, (129-156), (2014).
- B. E. Weeks and R. K. Garrett, Electoral Consequences of Political Rumors: Motivated Reasoning, Candidate Rumors, and Vote Choice during the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 4, (401), (2014).
- Thomas M. Dolan, Emotion and Strategic Learning in War, Foreign Policy Analysis, (n/a), (2014).
- Thomas J. Leeper, The Informational Basis for Mass Polarization, Public Opinion Quarterly, 78, 1, (27), (2014).
- Jeffrey Lyons and William P. Jaeger, Who Do Voters Blame for Policy Failure? Information and the Partisan Assignment of Blame, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 14, 3, (321), (2014).
- David P. Redlawsk, Caroline J. Tolbert and Natasha Altema McNeely, Symbolic Racism and Emotional Responses to the 2012 Presidential Candidates, Political Research Quarterly, 67, 3, (680), (2014).
- Ingrid Johnsen Haas and William A. Cunningham, The Uncertainty Paradox: Perceived Threat Moderates the Effect of Uncertainty on Political Tolerance, Political Psychology, 35, 2, (291), (2014).
- Stephanie Edgerly, Emily K. Vraga, Bryan McLaughlin, German Alvarez, JungHwan Yang and Young Mie Kim, Navigational Structures and Information Selection Goals: A Closer Look at Online Selectivity, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 4, (542), (2014).
- Armen E. Allahverdyan, Aram Galstyan and Pablo Branas-Garza, Opinion Dynamics with Confirmation Bias, PLoS ONE, 9, 7, (e99557), (2014).
- Yanna Krupnikov, How Negativity Can Increase and Decrease Voter Turnout: The Effect of Timing, Political Communication, 31, 3, (446), (2014).
- Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Stephan Lewandowsky, Olivia Fenton and Kelsey Martin, Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation, Memory & Cognition, 42, 2, (292), (2014).
- Benjamin R. Knoll, David P. Redlawsk and Howard Sanborn, Response to “Framing Unauthorized Immigrants: The Effects of Labels on Evaluations,” by Ommundsen, et al. (2014), Psychological Reports, 115, 3, (913), (2014).
- Patrick Haack, Michael D. Pfarrer and Andreas Georg Scherer, Legitimacy‐as‐Feeling: How Affect Leads to Vertical Legitimacy Spillovers in Transnational Governance, Journal of Management Studies, 51, 4, (634-666), (2013).
- Michael W. Gruszczynski, Amanda Balzer, Carly M. Jacobs, Kevin B. Smith and John R. Hibbing, The Physiology of Political Participation, Political Behavior, 35, 1, (135), (2013).
- Robert Y. Shapiro, Hearing the Opposition: It Starts at the Top, Critical Review, 25, 2, (226), (2013).
- Evan Parker-Stephen, Tides of Disagreement: How Reality Facilitates (and Inhibits) Partisan Public Opinion, The Journal of Politics, 75, 4, (1077), (2013).
- Jeffrey A. Gottfried, Bruce W. Hardy, Kenneth M. Winneg and Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Did Fact Checking Matter in the 2012 Presidential Campaign?, American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 11, (1558), (2013).
- Markus Prior, Media and Political Polarization, Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 1, (101), (2013).
- Beth Miller, Failing to Recall: Examining the Effects of Trace Decay and Interference on Memory for Campaign Information, Political Psychology, 34, 3, (289-305), (2013).
- Piero Stanig, Political polarization in retrospective economic evaluations during recessions and recoveries, Electoral Studies, 32, 4, (729), (2013).
- Nicholas A. Seltzer, April A. Johnson and Karyn A. Amira, Revisiting Dynamic Social Impact Theory: Extensions and Applications for Political Science, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 26, 4, (349), (2013).
- M. P. McDonald and C. J. Tolbert, Perceptions vs. Actual Exposure to Electoral Competition and Effects on Political Participation, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 3, (538), (2012).
- Eric Groenendyk, Justifying Party Identification: A Case of Identifying with the “Lesser of Two Evils”, Political Behavior, 34, 3, (453), (2012).
- Mason Richey, Motivated Reasoning in Political Information Processing, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 42, 4, (511), (2012).
- J. C. Baumgartner, J. S. Morris and N. L. Walth, The Fey Effect: Young Adults, Political Humor, and Perceptions of Sarah Palin in the 2008 Presidential Election Campaign, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 1, (95), (2012).
- Jennifer Jerit and Jason Barabas, Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment, The Journal of Politics, 74, 3, (672), (2012).
- JAMES N. DRUCKMAN, JORDAN FEIN and THOMAS J. LEEPER, A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability, American Political Science Review, 106, 02, (430), (2012).
- Luciana Carraro, Luigi Castelli, Ioana Breazu, Giulia Campomizzi, Antonella Cerruto, Massimiliano Mariani and Ivano Toto, Just ignore or counterattack? On the effects of different strategies for dealing with political attacks, European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 6, (789), (2012).
- Daniel Stevens, Susan Banducci, Jeffrey Karp and Jack Vowles, Priming time for Blair? Media priming, Iraq, and leadership evaluations in Britain, Electoral Studies, 30, 3, (546), (2011).
- S. L. Althaus and K. Coe, Priming Patriots: Social Identity Processes and the Dynamics of Public Support for War, Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 1, (65), (2011).
- Gregory Brazeal, WEBS OF FAITH AS A SOURCE OF REASONABLE DISAGREEMENT, Critical Review, 23, 4, (421), (2011).
- Eric Groenendyk, Current Emotion Research in Political Science: How Emotions Help Democracy Overcome its Collective Action Problem, Emotion Review, 3, 4, (455), (2011).
- Benjamin R. Knoll, David P. Redlawsk and Howard Sanborn, Framing Labels and Immigration Policy Attitudes in the Iowa Caucuses: “Trying to Out-Tancredo Tancredo”, Political Behavior, 33, 3, (433), (2011).
- David P. Redlawsk, Caroline J. Tolbert and William Franko, Voters, Emotions, and Race in 2008: Obama as the First Black President, Political Research Quarterly, 10.1177/1065912910373554, 63, 4, (875-889), (2010).
- Dennis Chong and Kevin J. Mullinix, Information and Issue Constraints on Party Cues, American Politics Research, 10.1177/1532673X18803887, (1532673X1880388), (2018).
- Joshua Robison, Does Social Disagreement Attenuate Partisan Motivated Reasoning? A Test Case Concerning Economic Evaluations, British Journal of Political Science, 10.1017/S0007123418000315, (1-17), (2018).
- Andrew Guess and Alexander Coppock, Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments, British Journal of Political Science, 10.1017/S0007123418000327, (1-19), (2018).
- Pavlos Vasilopoulos, George E. Marcus, Nicholas A. Valentino and Martial Foucault, Fear, Anger, and Voting for the Far Right: Evidence From the November 13, 2015 Paris Terror Attacks, Political Psychology, , (2018).
