The Scandinavian Journal of Economics

Volume 112, Issue 3

Measurement Error in Education and Growth Regressions*

Miguel Portela

University of Minho, 4710‐057 Braga, Portugal mangelo@eeg.uminho.pt

Search for more papers by this author
Rob Alessie

University of Groningen, NL‐9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands r.j.m.alessie@rug.nl

Search for more papers by this author
Coen Teulings

CPB—Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, NL‐2508 GM The Hague, Netherlands c.n.teulings@cpb.nl

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 August 2010
Cited by: 4

*The first author gratefully acknowledges financial support by the Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology (FCT; ref. SFRH/BD/5114/2001). For comments on previous versions of the paper, we thank Thijs van Rens, Ana Rute Cardoso, and the participants at the Tinbergen Institute Seminar, the 2003 Microeconometrics Conference at CEMFI, the IXth Spring Meeting of Young Economists, the 2004 European Economic Association and Econometric Society Conference. We also thank anonymous referees for their helpful comments.

Abstract

The use of the perpetual inventory method for the construction of education data per country leads to systematic measurement error. This paper analyzes its effect on growth regressions. We suggest a methodology for correcting this error. The standard attenuation bias suggests that using these corrected data would lead to a higher coefficient. Our regressions reveal the opposite. We discuss why this is the case.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.