Volume 24, Issue 1

Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2‐table when testing the equality of two probabilities

R. D. Boschloo

*Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: March 1970
Citations: 102

Summary

In this paper it is to be shown that Fisher's non‐randomizing exact test for 2 × 2‐tables, which is a conditional test, can by simple means be changed into an unconditional test using raised levels of significance; not seldom, especially for not too large samples, the level of significance can be doubled. This leads in many cases to a considerable increase of power of the test. A table with raised levels has been prepared up to sample sizes of 50 and a rule of thumb, which can be used if this table is not available, has been developEd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 102

  • Evolutions in Photoelectric Cross Section Calculations and Their Validation, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 10.1109/TNS.2020.2971173, 67, 3, (492-501), (2020).
  • On powerful exact nonrandomized tests for the Poisson two-sample setting, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280219900901, (096228021990090), (2020).
  • Prevalence and Risk Factors of Incidental Findings in Brain MRIs of Healthy Neonates—The FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Frontiers in Neurology, 10.3389/fneur.2019.01347, 10, (2020).
  • Clinical Performance of Posterior Inlay‐Retained and Wing‐Retained Monolithic Zirconia Resin‐Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures: Stage One Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal of Prosthodontics, 10.1111/jopr.13258, 0, 0, (2020).
  • A more powerful unconditional exact test of homogeneity for 2 × c contingency table analysis , Journal of Applied Statistics, 10.1080/02664763.2019.1601689, (1-11), (2019).
  • Validation of Shell Ionization Cross Sections for Monte Carlo Electron Transport, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 10.1109/TNS.2018.2851921, 65, 8, (2279-2302), (2018).
  • An exhaustive numerical assessment of alternative unconditional tests of a binary treatment effect, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 10.1080/00949655.2018.1452018, 88, 11, (2150-2169), (2018).
  • An Unconditional Test for Change Point Detection in Binary Sequences with Applications to Clinical Registries, Methods of Information in Medicine, 10.3414/ME15-02-0020, 55, 04, (367-372), (2018).
  • Methods for the analysis of multiple endpoints in small populations: A review, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2018.1489402, (1-29), (2018).
  • Determining sample size for a binary diagnostic test in the presence of verification bias, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2018.1452029, (1-10), (2018).
  • A boundary‐optimized rejection region test for the two‐sample binomial problem, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7579, 37, 7, (1047-1058), (2017).
  • Holocene Selection for Variants Associated With General Cognitive Ability: Comparing Ancient and Modern Genomes, Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10.1017/thg.2017.37, 20, 4, (271-280), (2017).
  • Disease-modifying effect of intravenous immunoglobulin in an experimental model of epilepsy, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/srep40528, 7, 1, (2017).
  • A polygraph test for trustworthy structural similarity, Information Systems, 10.1016/j.is.2016.07.005, 64, (194-205), (2017).
  • Social comparison nudges—Guessing the norm increases charitable giving, Economics Letters, 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.023, 152, (73-75), (2017).
  • Quantitative Test of the Evolution of Geant4 Electron Backscattering Simulation, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 10.1109/TNS.2016.2617834, 63, 6, (2849-2865), (2016).
  • Validation of Cross Sections for Monte Carlo Simulation of the Photoelectric Effect, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 10.1109/TNS.2016.2521876, 63, 2, (1117-1146), (2016).
  • Bereavement Hits Harder on Those Who Believe in Fate, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10.1521/jscp.2016.35.8.609, 35, 8, (609-628), (2016).
  • Exact Statistical Inference for a 2×2 Table, Exact Statistical Inference for Categorical Data, 10.1016/B978-0-08-100681-8.00001-4, (1-27), (2016).
  • Bibliography, Exact Statistical Inference for Categorical Data, 10.1016/B978-0-08-100681-8.09996-6, (49-54), (2016).
  • Exact Statistical Inference for a 2×K Table, Exact Statistical Inference for Categorical Data, 10.1016/B978-0-08-100681-8.00002-6, (29-42), (2016).
  • Proving non-inferiority or equivalence of two treatments with dichotomous endpoints using exact methods, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1191/0962280203sm314ra, 12, 1, (37-58), (2016).
  • The Effects of a Simulated Head-Up Display Speedometer on Perceptual Task Performance, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 10.1177/001872089003200306, 32, 3, (329-339), (2016).
  • Comparison of Test Sizing Approaches for Initial and Follow-On Evaluation of Strategic Weapon Systems, Quality Engineering, 10.1080/08982112.2014.957402, 27, 2, (230-252), (2015).
  • Nearly exact sample size calculation for powerful non‐randomized tests for differences between binomial proportions, Statistica Neerlandica, 10.1111/stan.12063, 69, 4, (358-373), (2015).
  • Conditional and Unconditional Tests (and Sample Size) Based on Multiple Comparisons for Stratified 2 × 2 Tables, Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 10.1155/2015/147038, 2015, (1-8), (2015).
  • Itraconazole treatment reduces Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis prevalence and increases overwinter field survival in juvenile Cascades frogs, Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 10.3354/dao02813, 112, 3, (243-250), (2015).
  • When Similarity Measures Lie, Similarity Search and Applications, 10.1007/978-3-319-25087-8_11, (113-124), (2015).
  • Validation Test of Geant4 Simulation of Electron Backscattering, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 10.1109/TNS.2015.2401055, 62, 2, (451-479), (2015).
  • The Excess Burden of Cytomegalovirus in African American Communities: A Geospatial Analysis, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 10.1093/ofid/ofv180, 2, 4, (ofv180), (2015).
  • On the Exact Size of Tests of Treatment Effects in Multi‐Arm Clinical Trials, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 10.1111/anzs.12089, 56, 4, (359-369), (2014).
  • Proportions: Inferences and Comparisons, Methods and Applications of Statistics in Clinical Trials, 10.1002/9781118596333, (570-594), (2014).
  • Exact Inference Methods for Rare Events, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 10.1002/9781118445112, (1-6), (2014).
  • Proportions, Inferences and Comparisons, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 10.1002/9781118445112, (2014).
  • Exact Meta-Analysis Approach for Discrete Data and its Application to 2 × 2 Tables With Rare Events, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2014.946318, 109, 508, (1450-1465), (2014).
  • Preferences and beliefs in a sequential social dilemma: a within-subjects analysis, Games and Economic Behavior, 10.1016/j.geb.2014.05.005, 87, (122-135), (2014).
  • Powerful Exact Unconditional Tests for Agreement between Two Raters with Binary Endpoints, PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0097386, 9, 5, (e97386), (2014).
  • Hypothesis Tests under Misspecification and Relaxed Assumptions, Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_8, (339-359), (2013).
  • Large Sample Results for Likelihood-Based Methods, Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_6, (275-293), (2013).
  • Bayesian Inference, Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_4, (163-203), (2013).
  • Permutation and Rank Tests, Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_12, (449-530), (2013).
  • Monte Carlo Simulation Studies, Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_9, (363-383), (2013).
  • M-Estimation (Estimating Equations), Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_7, (297-337), (2013).
  • Likelihood-Based Tests and Confidence Regions, Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_3, (125-161), (2013).
  • Multivariate Hypothesis Tests, Statistical Models for Proportions and Probabilities, 10.1007/978-3-642-39041-8_4, (41-57), (2013).
  • Large Sample Theory: The Basics, Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_5, (207-274), (2013).
  • Jackknife, Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_10, (385-411), (2013).
  • Roles of Modeling in Statistical Inference, Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_1, (3-23), (2013).
  • Statistical Challenges in the Evaluation of Treatments for Small Patient Populations, Science Translational Medicine, 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004018, 5, 178, (178sr3-178sr3), (2013).
  • More efficient unconditional tests for exchangeable binary data with equal cluster sizes, Statistics & Probability Letters, 10.1016/j.spl.2012.11.014, 83, 2, (644-649), (2013).
  • Validation of Geant4 Simulation of Electron Energy Deposition, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 10.1109/TNS.2013.2272404, 60, 4, (2934-2957), (2013).
  • A Note on Exact Conditional and Unconditional Tests for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium, Human Heredity, 10.1159/000353205, 76, 1, (10-17), (2013).
  • Bootstrap, Essential Statistical Inference, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4818-1_11, (413-448), (2013).
  • Unconditional tests for comparing two ordered multinomials, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280212450957, 25, 1, (241-254), (2012).
  • Bibliography, Nonparametric Statistical Tests, 10.1201/b11427, (203-226), (2011).
  • Inference on Proportions, Design and Analysis of Non-Inferiority Trials, 10.1201/b11039-12, (251-317), (2011).
  • Belief elicitation in experiments: is there a hedging problem?, Experimental Economics, 10.1007/s10683-010-9249-1, 13, 4, (412-438), (2010).
  • Good practice in testing for an association in contingency tables, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-010-1014-0, 64, 9, (1505-1513), (2010).
  • References, Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence and Noninferiority, Second Edition, 10.1201/EBK1439808184, (387-401), (2010).
  • P-values based on approximate conditioning and, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.10.007, 140, 4, (1073-1081), (2010).
  • Exact tests based on pre-estimation and second order pivotals: non-inferiority trials, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 10.1080/00949650902806476, 80, 8, (841-851), (2010).
  • Improved P -Values for Testing Marginal Homogeneity in 2 × 2 Contingency Tables , Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 10.1080/03610920802678644, 38, 10, (1649-1663), (2009).
  • Recommended tests for association in 2×2 tables, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.3531, 28, 7, (1159-1175), (2009).
  • Testing noninferiority in three‐armed clinical trials based on likelihood ratio statistics, Canadian Journal of Statistics, 10.1002/cjs.5550350306, 35, 3, (413-431), (2009).
  • Comments on ‘How conservative is Fisher's exact test? A quantitative evaluation of the two‐sample comparative binomial trial’ by G. G. Crans and J. J. Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:3598–3611, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.3454, 28, 1, (173-174), (2008).
  • Bringing Game Theory to Hypothesis Testing: Establishing Finite Sample Bounds on Inference, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.1266059, (2008).
  • Improved p -Value Tests for Comparing Two Independent Binomial Proportions , Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 10.1080/03610910802417812, 38, 1, (78-91), (2008).
  • A Nonrandomized, Nonconservative Version of the Fisher Exact Test, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 10.1080/03610920701669827, 37, 5, (699-708), (2008).
  • The Neyman‐Pearson theory for testing statistical hypotheses, Statistica Neerlandica, 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1971.tb00130.x, 25, 1, (1-27), (2008).
  • Comparing two independent incidence rates using conditional and unconditional exact tests, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.289, 7, 3, (195-201), (2007).
  • Unconditional efficient one‐sided confidence limits for the odds ratio based on conditional likelihood, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.2896, 26, 28, (5136-5146), (2007).
  • Proportions, Inferences, and Comparisons, Wiley Encyclopedia of Clinical Trials, 10.1002/9780471462422, (1-15), (2007).
  • A filter for “confidence interval -values”, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2007.02.015, 51, 12, (6435-6446), (2007).
  • On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2×2 contingency table: an overview of fisher's exact test and yates' correction for continuity, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543409508835098, 5, 1, (43-70), (2007).
  • Comparing two independent binomial proportions by a modified chi square test, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.4710220305, 22, 3, (241-248), (2007).
  • References, Exact Analysis of Discrete Data, 10.1201/9781420036190, (485-513), (2005).
  • Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Two‐Arm Non‐inferiority Trials with Binary Outcomes, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.200410090, 47, 1, (48-61), (2005).
  • Proportions, Inferences, and Comparisons, Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, 10.1002/0470011815, (2005).
  • Testing general hypotheses under binomial sampling: the two sample case—asymptotic theory and exact procedures, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2004.05.035, 49, 3, (723-739), (2005).
  • Confidence intervals for two sample binomial distribution, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/j.jspi.2003.09.039, 130, 1-2, (359-375), (2005).
  • Comparing the asymptotic power of exact tests in 2×2 tables, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2003.11.012, 47, 4, (745-756), (2004).
  • A Comparison of the Three Conditional Exact Tests in Two‐way Contingency Tables Using the Unconditional Exact Power, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.200310031, 46, 3, (320-330), (2004).
  • Unconditional exact tests for the difference of binomial probabilities—contrasted and compared, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2003.11.013, 47, 4, (757-773), (2004).
  • Prenatal influence of mild decompressions on hooded rats, Developmental Psychobiology, 10.1002/dev.420130406, 13, 4, (399-407), (2004).
  • Inequalities between hypergeometric tails, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 10.1155/S1173912603000154, 7, 3, (165-174), (2003).
  • Inequalities Between Hypergeometric Tails, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 10.1207/S15327612JAMD0703_03, 7, 3, (165-174), (2003).
  • A Cautionary Note on Exact Unconditional Inference for a Difference between Two Independent Binomial Proportions, Biometrics, 10.1111/1541-0420.00051, 59, 2, (441-450), (2003).
  • Structural properties of UMPU-tests for 2×2 tables and some applications, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/S0378-3758(01)00122-7, 104, 1, (103-120), (2002).
  • Statistical considerations of FDA and CPMP rules for the investigation of new anti‐bacterial products, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.729, 20, 17‐18, (2561-2571), (2001).
  • On the Comparison of Two Observed Frequencies, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/1521-4036(200102)43:1<23::AID-BIMJ23>3.0.CO;2-8, 43, 1, (23-43), (2001).
  • Exact tests of equivalence and efficacy with a non‐zero lower bound for comparative studies by I. S. F. Chan, Statistics in Medicine, 17, 1403–1413 (1998), Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13<1734::AID-SIM201>3.0.CO;2-7, 18, 13, (1734-1735), (1999).
  • Fisher's Mid-P-value arrangement in 2×2 Comparative trials, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/S0167-9473(98)90179-7, 29, 1, (107-115), (1998).
  • More Powerful Tests from Confidence Interval p Values , The American Statistician, 10.1080/00031305.1996.10473559, 50, 4, (314-318), (1996).
  • Letters to the Editor, The American Statistician, 10.1080/00031305.1994.10476051, 48, 2, (174-177), (1994).
  • Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/0167-9473(94)90148-1, 17, 5, (555-574), (1994).
  • Determining the best test for the 2×2 comparative trial, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 10.1080/00949658908811206, 34, 1, (51-65), (1989).
  • Analysis of Cross-Classified Data, Prescriptions for Working Statisticians, 10.1007/978-1-4612-3794-5_9, (252-287), (1988).
  • Unbiasedness: Theory and First Applications, Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 10.1007/978-1-4757-1923-9_4, (134-187), (1986).
  • Letters to the Editor, The American Statistician, 10.1080/00031305.1977.10479221, 31, 3, (134-135), (1977).
  • A Nonrandomized Unconditional Test for Comparing Two Proportions in 2×2 Contingency Tables, Technometrics, 10.1080/00401706.1977.10489522, 19, 2, (145-157), (1977).
  • See more

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.