The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Effectiveness of the Coping Power Program in middle‐school children with disruptive behaviours and hyperactivity difficulties

DIOMARIS E. JURECSKA

Corresponding Author

Children's Hospital & Research Center, Oakland

Diomaris E. Jurecska, Behavioral Pediatrics Clinic, Children's Hospital Oakland, 645 4th Street, Oakland, CA 94607, USA, Email:

djurecska@mail.cho.org

;

diomaris@jurecska.com

Search for more papers by this author
ELIZABETH B. HAMILTON

Graduate School of Clinical Psychology at George Fox University

Search for more papers by this author
MARY A. PETERSON

Graduate Department of Clinical Psychology at George Fox University, Oregon

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 November 2011
Cited by: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to discuss the effectiveness of the Coping Power Program (CPP); an evidence‐based treatment delivered in a group format to at‐risk middle‐school children. Initially, two groups were randomised and formed: an intervention group of 24 CPP sessions and a control group. All students were enrolled in public schools from two rural counties in the United States. Out of the 119 total participants 63 (37 male) were in the intervention and 56 (35 male) were in the control group. From the larger intervention group, a subset of students was identified as ‘significantly improved’. Using the Behavior Assessment Scale for Children‐2 (BASC‐2), a pre‐ and post‐intervention measure showed that students with clinically significant hyperactivity and behavioural difficulties scores were the most sensitive to the group intervention.

Number of times cited: 3

  • , Evidence-Based Assessment and Intervention for Anger in School Psychology, Handbook of Australian School Psychology, 10.1007/978-3-319-45166-4_18, (349-376), (2017).
  • , References, Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder in Childhood, (227-310), (2016).
  • , Reducing Bullying: Application of Social Cognitive Theory, Theory Into Practice, 53, 4, (271), (2014).