The Analysis of Experimental Data: The Appreciation of Tea and Wine
Summary
A classical experiment on the tasting of tea is used to show that many standard methods of analysis of the resulting data are unsatisfactory. A similar experiment with wine is used to show how a more sensible method may be developed.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited: 17
- Eric Sowey and Peter Petocz, Answers to the chapter questions, A Panorama of Statistics, (197-305), (2017).
- Alexander Etz and Joachim Vandekerckhove, Introduction to Bayesian Inference for Psychology, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (2017).
- Esteban Vázquez-Cano, Eloy López Meneses and Eduardo García-Garzón, Differences in basic digital competences between male and female university students of Social Sciences in Spain, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 1, (2017).
- Zoltan Dienes and Neil Mclatchie, Four reasons to prefer Bayesian analyses over significance testing, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (2017).
- Alexander Etz, Quentin F. Gronau, Fabian Dablander, Peter A. Edelsbrunner and Beth Baribault, How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (2017).
- Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Maarten Marsman, Tahira Jamil, Alexander Ly, Josine Verhagen, Jonathon Love, Ravi Selker, Quentin F. Gronau, Martin Šmíra, Sacha Epskamp, Dora Matzke, Jeffrey N. Rouder and Richard D. Morey, Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (2017).
- Zoltan Dienes, How Bayes factors change scientific practice, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, (78), (2016).
- Sandra Andraszewicz, Benjamin Scheibehenne, Jörg Rieskamp, Raoul Grasman, Josine Verhagen and Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, An Introduction to Bayesian Hypothesis Testing for Management Research, Journal of Management, 41, 2, (521), (2015).
- James Penston, Statistics‐based research – a pig in a poke?, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 5, (862-867), (2011).
- Raymond Hubbard and R. Murray Lindsay, Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing, Theory & Psychology, 18, 1, (69), (2008).
- Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 5, (779), (2007).
- Joachim Krueger, Null hypothesis significance testing: On the survival of a flawed method., American Psychologist, 56, 1, (16), (2001).
- Augustias Vallecillos, Understanding of the Logic of Hypothesis Testing Amongst University Students, Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 21, 2, (101), (2000).
- Carmen Batanero, Controversies Around the Role of Statistical Tests in Experimental Research, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 1-2, (75), (2000).
- Ruma Falk, Replication-A Step in the Right Direction, Theory & Psychology, 8, 3, (313), (1998).
- Ruma Falk and Charles W. Greenbaum, Significance Tests Die Hard, Theory & Psychology, 5, 1, (75), (1995).
- Denes Szucs and John P. A. Ioannidis, When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00390, 11, (2017).
