The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Does knowledge of connectives play a unique role in the reading comprehension of English learners and English‐only students?

Amy C. Crosson

Corresponding Author

Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, , USA

Address for correspondence: Amy C. Crosson, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3939 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Email:

acrosson@pitt.edu

Search for more papers by this author
Nonie K. Lesaux

Harvard Graduate School of Education, , USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 November 2011
Cited by: 14

Abstract

Connectives (e.g., although, meanwhile) carry abstract meanings and often signal key relationships between text ideas. This study explored whether understanding of connectives represents a unique domain of vocabulary knowledge that provides special leverage for reading comprehension, and whether the contribution of knowledge of connectives to reading comprehension differs for students from distinct language backgrounds. Understanding of connectives, word reading efficiency and breadth of vocabulary knowledge of 75 English language learners (ELLs) and 75 English‐only (EO) fifth graders were assessed. Hierarchical multiple regression techniques revealed that understanding of connectives explained a sizeable and significant portion of unique variance in comprehension beyond that explained by breadth of vocabulary knowledge when controlling for word reading efficiency. The magnitude of this relationship was larger for EO students than for ELLs. Findings indicate that connectives play an important role in comprehension, but that the strength of their influence varies by readers’ linguistic background.

Number of times cited: 14

  • , How referential uncertainty is modulated by conjunctions: ERP evidence from advanced Chinese–English L2 learners and English L1 speakers, Second Language Research, (026765831875694), (2018).
  • , Text analysis: Critical component of planning for text-based discussion focused on comprehension of informational texts, Literacy Research and Instruction, 57, 2, (100), (2018).
  • , Online processing of causal relations in beginning first and second language readers, Learning and Individual Differences, 61, (59), (2018).
  • , Comparing rhetorical devices in history textbooks and teachers’ lessons: Implications for the development of academic language skills, Linguistics and Education, 10.1016/j.linged.2018.07.004, 47, (16-26), (2018).
  • , Comparative signaling generated for expository texts by 4th–8th graders: variations by text structure strategy instruction, comprehension skill, and signal word, Reading and Writing, 10.1007/s11145-018-9871-4, 31, 9, (1937-1968), (2018).
  • , Expository text comprehension in secondary school: for which readers does knowledge of connectives contribute the most?, Journal of Research in Reading, 40, S1, (S42-S65), (2016).
  • , Multilingual learners, Developmental Perspectives in Written Language and Literacy, 10.1075/z.206.13gev, (2017).
  • , Mediation in the relationship among EL status, vocabulary, and science reading comprehension, The Journal of Educational Research, 110, 6, (665), (2017).
  • , Understanding the semantic functions of but in middle childhood: The role of text- and sentence-level comprehension abilities, First Language, 37, 2, (109), (2017).
  • , Does rhetorical competence moderate the effect of rhetorical devices on the comprehension of expository texts beyond general comprehension skills?, Reading and Writing, 30, 3, (439), (2017).
  • , Young Children's Comprehension of Temporal Relations in Complex Sentences: The Influence of Memory on Performance, Child Development, 86, 6, (1922-1934), (2015).
  • , The contribution of knowledge about anaphors, organisational signals and refutations to reading comprehension, Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 4, (405), (2015).
  • , Related General-Vocabulary Knowledge Transfers to Learning Technical Terms, Teaching of Psychology, 10.1177/0098628315589495, 42, 3, (254-259), (2015).
  • , Connectives, The Reading Teacher, 67, 3, (193-200), (2013).