The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Rethinking strategy instruction: direct reading strategy instruction versus computer‐based guided practice

Wolfgang Lenhard

Corresponding Author

Institute for Psychology, University of Würzburg, , Germany

Address for correspondence: Wolfgang Lenhard, Institute for Psychology, Departement IV, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 10, 97070 Würzburg, Germany. E‐mail:

wolfgang.lenhard@uni-wuerzburg.de

Search for more papers by this author
Herbert Baier

Institute for Psychology, University of Würzburg, , Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Darius Endlich

Institute for Psychology, University of Würzburg, , Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Wolfgang Schneider

Institute for Psychology, University of Würzburg, , Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Joachim Hoffmann

Institute for Psychology, University of Würzburg, , Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 November 2011
Cited by: 6

Abstract

There are many established reading strategy training programmes, which explicitly teach strategic and meta‐cognitive knowledge to improve reading comprehension. Although instruction in strategy knowledge leads to improvements in meta‐cognitive skills, the effects do not always transfer to reading comprehension. Therefore, to investigate preconditions for knowledge transfer, two different strategy training programmes were implemented in nine classes of Grade 6 students (N = 148) over the course of one school year. One programme involved teacher‐directed instruction of declarative meta‐cognitive knowledge (Reading Detectives; Rühl & Souvignier, 2006). The other aimed at improving executive meta‐cognition by guided practice: students worked with a computer program based on latent semantic analysis (LSA) (conText) and received immediate feedback on written summaries. Although both groups improved their strategy knowledge to the same extent, the conText group showed a greater improvement in reading comprehension. These fndings suggest that guided practice, which is characterised by intensive practice and individualised corrective feedback, is superior to explicitly teaching strategy knowledge.

Number of times cited: 6

  • , Supporting secondary school students' reading comprehension in computer environments: A systematic review, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34, 5, (557-566), (2018).
  • , Filtering Essays by Means of a Software Tool, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55, 1, (26), (2017).
  • , Effects of two forms of concept mapping on L2 reading comprehension and strategy awareness, Applied Linguistics Review, 0, 0, (2017).
  • , Improving second grade student’s reading fluency and comprehension using teacher-guided iPad®app instruction, Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 13, 3, (218), (2016).
  • , The effect of online summary assessment and feedback system on the summary writing on 6th graders: The LSA-based technique, Computers & Education, 95, (1), (2016).
  • , Incidental vocabulary acquisition from stories: Second and fourth graders learn more from listening than reading, First Language, 33, 6, (551), (2013).