The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Gender differences in inference generation by fourth‐grade students

Virginia Clinton

Corresponding Author

University of Wisconsin – Madison, , USA

Address for correspondence: Virginia Clinton, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, 1056 W Johnson St, Madison, WI 53715, USA. E‐mail:

vclinton@wisc.edu

Search for more papers by this author
Ben Seipel

California State University, , Chico, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Paul van den Broek

Leiden University, , The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Panayiota Kendeou

Neapolis University Pafos, , Cyprus

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah E. Carlson

Center of Teaching and Learning, University of Oregon, , USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 June 2012
Cited by: 6

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if there are gender differences among elementary school‐aged students in regard to the inferences they generate during reading. Fourth‐grade students (130 females; 126 males) completed think‐aloud tasks while reading one practice and one experimental narrative text. Females generated a larger number and a greater proportion of reinstatement inferences than did males (Cohen's d = .34, p = .01; Cohen's d = .26, p = .04, respectively). In contrast, there was no evidence for gender differences in other types of think‐aloud responses. These findings suggest that males and females differ in their use of cognitive processes that underlie reading comprehension, particularly with respect to the likelihood of retrieval of information from episodic memory.

Number of times cited: 6

  • , Why do boys and girls perform differently on PISA Reading in Finland? The effects of reading fluency, achievement behaviour, leisure reading and homework activity, Journal of Research in Reading, 41, 1, (122), (2018).
  • , Cross‐lagged relations between teacher and parent ratings of children's task avoidance and different literacy skills, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 3, (438-455), (2017).
  • , Humor Facilitates Text Comprehension: Evidence from Eye Movements, Discourse Processes, 54, 4, (259), (2017).
  • , How Readability Factors Are Differentially Associated With Performance for Students of Different Backgrounds When Solving Mathematics Word Problems, American Educational Research Journal, (000283121773702), (2017).
  • , The effect of schooling on basic cognition in selected nordic countries, Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13, 4, (645), (2017).
  • , The School Age Gender Gap in Reading Achievement: Examining the Influences of Item Format and Intrinsic Reading Motivation, Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 2, (219-232), (2015).