Texting, textese and literacy abilities: a naturalistic study
Abstract
In this study, we examined texting behaviours, text message characteristics (textese) of actual sent text messages and the relationships between texting, textese and literacy abilities in a sample of 183 American undergraduates. As compared to previous naturalistic and experimental studies with English‐speaking adults, both texting frequency and textism density (proportion of textese) were greater, but category density analyses were similar to a recent experimental study with undergraduates. Interestingly, whilst overall textism density was negatively related to reading and spelling, some textism categories (e.g., omitted apostrophes) were negatively related to literacy skills, while others (e.g., accent stylisation) were positively related to literacy skills. The use of predictive texting was a moderator in this relationship. Our results may help explain the discordant findings between children and adults with regard to textese use and literacy skills, and also highlight the importance of conducting analyses of category density and predictive texting in studies of texting and literacy.
Number of times cited: 26
- Rebecca Roeder, Elizabeth Miller and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pedagogy, Audience, and Attitudes: Influencing University Students’ Metalinguistic Awareness About Texting Practices, Analyzing Digital Discourse, 10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_13, (367-389), (2018).
- Alejandro Gómez-Camacho, Coral I. Hunt-Gómez and Andrés Valverde-Macías, Textisms, texting, and spelling in Spanish, Lingua, 201, (92), (2018).
- Dmitri Zebroff, Youth texting: Help or hindrance to literacy?, Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1, (341), (2018).
- Aubrie Adams, Jai Miles, Norah E Dunbar and Howard Giles, Communication accommodation in text messages: Exploring liking, power, and sex as predictors of textisms, The Journal of Social Psychology, 10.1080/00224545.2017.1421895, 158, 4, (474-490), (2018).
- Sam Waldron, Clare Wood and Nenagh Kemp, Use of predictive text in text messaging over the course of a year and its relationship with spelling, orthographic processing and grammar, Journal of Research in Reading, 40, 4, (384-402), (2016).
- KENNETH KENG WEE ONG, Textese and Singlish in multiparty chats, World Englishes, 36, 4, (611-630), (2017).
- Nenagh Kemp and Jennifer Clayton, University students vary their use of textese in digital messages to suit the recipient, Journal of Research in Reading, 40, S1, (S141-S157), (2016).
- Michelle McSweeney, I Text English to Everyone: Links between Second-Language Texting and Academic Proficiency, Languages, 2, 3, (7), (2017).
- Dmitri Zebroff and David Kaufman, Texting, reading, and other daily habits associated with adolescents’ literacy levels, Education and Information Technologies, 22, 5, (2197), (2017).
- Nenagh Kemp and Abbie Grace, Txting across time: undergraduates’ use of ‘textese’ in seven consecutive first-year psychology cohorts, Writing Systems Research, 10.1080/17586801.2017.1285220, 9, 1, (82-98), (2017).
- Alejandro Gómez-Camacho, Francisco Núnez-Román and Vìctor Perera-Rodríguez, Testismi, messaggistica e didattica dell'italiano: percezioni degli studenti universitari, CADMO, 2, (57), (2017).
- Brian C. Harrell, Using Twitter to Scaffold English Composition, Engaging 21st Century Writers with Social Media, 10.4018/978-1-5225-0562-4.ch003, (32-50)
- Jasone Cenoz and Garbiñe Bereziartua, Is instant messaging the same in every language? A basque perspective, Reading and Writing, 29, 6, (1225), (2016).
- Abbie Grace, Nenagh Kemp, Frances H Martin and Rauno Parrila, Undergraduates’ attitudes to text messaging language use and intrusions of textisms into formal writing, New Media & Society, 17, 5, (792), (2015).
- Abbie Grace and Nenagh Kemp, Assessing the Written Language of Text Messages, The Wiley Handbook of Psychology, Technology, and Society, (207-231), (2015).
- Naciye Guliz Ugur and Tugba Koc, Time for Digital Detox: Misuse of Mobile Technology and Phubbing, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, (1022), (2015).
- Abbie Grace and Nenagh Kemp, Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts, Writing Systems Research, 7, 2, (220), (2015).
- Sinéad McCausland, Justé Kingston and Fiona Lyddy, Processing costs when reading short message service shortcuts: An eye-tracking study, Writing Systems Research, 7, 1, (97), (2015).
- Abbie Grace, Nenagh Kemp, Frances Heritage Martin and Rauno Parrila, Undergraduates’ text messaging language and literacy skills, Reading and Writing, 27, 5, (855), (2014).
- GREG DOWNEY, All Forms of Writing, Mind & Language, 29, 3, (304-319), (2014).
- Nenagh Kemp, Clare Wood and Sam Waldron, do i know its wrong: children’s and adults’ use of unconventional grammar in text messaging, Reading and Writing, 27, 9, (1585), (2014).
- Blanche W. O'Bannon and Kevin Thomas, Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters!, Computers & Education, 74, (15), (2014).
- Kevin M. Thomas, Blanche W. O’Bannon and Virginia G. Britt, Standing in the Schoolhouse Door: Teacher Perceptions of Mobile Phones in the Classroom, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46, 4, (373), (2014).
- Clare Wood, Nenagh Kemp and Sam Waldron, Exploring the longitudinal relationships between the use of grammar in text messaging and performance on grammatical tasks, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 4, (415), (2014).
- Kevin Thomas and Blanche O’Bannon, Cell Phones in the Classroom, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30, 1, (11), (2013).
- Abbie Grace, Nenagh Kemp, Frances Heritage Martin and Rauno Parrila, Undergraduates' use of text messaging language: Effects of country and collection method, Writing Systems Research, 4, 2, (167), (2012).




