The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Texting, textese and literacy abilities: a naturalistic study

Michelle Drouin

Corresponding Author

Department of Psychology, Indiana University‐Purdue University Fort Wayne, , USA

Address for correspondence: Michelle Drouin, Department of Psychology, Indiana University‐Purdue University Fort Wayne, 2101 E. Coliseum Blvd., Fort Wayne, IN 46805, USA. E‐mail:

drouinm@ipfw.edu

Search for more papers by this author
Brent Driver

Department of Psychology, Indiana University‐Purdue University Fort Wayne, , USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 July 2012
Cited by: 26

Abstract

In this study, we examined texting behaviours, text message characteristics (textese) of actual sent text messages and the relationships between texting, textese and literacy abilities in a sample of 183 American undergraduates. As compared to previous naturalistic and experimental studies with English‐speaking adults, both texting frequency and textism density (proportion of textese) were greater, but category density analyses were similar to a recent experimental study with undergraduates. Interestingly, whilst overall textism density was negatively related to reading and spelling, some textism categories (e.g., omitted apostrophes) were negatively related to literacy skills, while others (e.g., accent stylisation) were positively related to literacy skills. The use of predictive texting was a moderator in this relationship. Our results may help explain the discordant findings between children and adults with regard to textese use and literacy skills, and also highlight the importance of conducting analyses of category density and predictive texting in studies of texting and literacy.

Number of times cited: 26

  • , Pedagogy, Audience, and Attitudes: Influencing University Students’ Metalinguistic Awareness About Texting Practices, Analyzing Digital Discourse, 10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_13, (367-389), (2018).
  • , Textisms, texting, and spelling in Spanish, Lingua, 201, (92), (2018).
  • , Youth texting: Help or hindrance to literacy?, Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1, (341), (2018).
  • , Communication accommodation in text messages: Exploring liking, power, and sex as predictors of textisms, The Journal of Social Psychology, 10.1080/00224545.2017.1421895, 158, 4, (474-490), (2018).
  • , Use of predictive text in text messaging over the course of a year and its relationship with spelling, orthographic processing and grammar, Journal of Research in Reading, 40, 4, (384-402), (2016).
  • , Textese and Singlish in multiparty chats, World Englishes, 36, 4, (611-630), (2017).
  • , University students vary their use of textese in digital messages to suit the recipient, Journal of Research in Reading, 40, S1, (S141-S157), (2016).
  • , I Text English to Everyone: Links between Second-Language Texting and Academic Proficiency, Languages, 2, 3, (7), (2017).
  • , Texting, reading, and other daily habits associated with adolescents’ literacy levels, Education and Information Technologies, 22, 5, (2197), (2017).
  • , Txting across time: undergraduates’ use of ‘textese’ in seven consecutive first-year psychology cohorts, Writing Systems Research, 10.1080/17586801.2017.1285220, 9, 1, (82-98), (2017).
  • , Testismi, messaggistica e didattica dell'italiano: percezioni degli studenti universitari, CADMO, 2, (57), (2017).
  • , Using Twitter to Scaffold English Composition, Engaging 21st Century Writers with Social Media, 10.4018/978-1-5225-0562-4.ch003, (32-50)
  • , Is instant messaging the same in every language? A basque perspective, Reading and Writing, 29, 6, (1225), (2016).
  • , Undergraduates’ attitudes to text messaging language use and intrusions of textisms into formal writing, New Media & Society, 17, 5, (792), (2015).
  • , Assessing the Written Language of Text Messages, The Wiley Handbook of Psychology, Technology, and Society, (207-231), (2015).
  • , Time for Digital Detox: Misuse of Mobile Technology and Phubbing, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, (1022), (2015).
  • , Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts, Writing Systems Research, 7, 2, (220), (2015).
  • , Processing costs when reading short message service shortcuts: An eye-tracking study, Writing Systems Research, 7, 1, (97), (2015).
  • , Undergraduates’ text messaging language and literacy skills, Reading and Writing, 27, 5, (855), (2014).
  • , All Forms of Writing, Mind & Language, 29, 3, (304-319), (2014).
  • , do i know its wrong: children’s and adults’ use of unconventional grammar in text messaging, Reading and Writing, 27, 9, (1585), (2014).
  • , Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters!, Computers & Education, 74, (15), (2014).
  • , Standing in the Schoolhouse Door: Teacher Perceptions of Mobile Phones in the Classroom, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46, 4, (373), (2014).
  • , Exploring the longitudinal relationships between the use of grammar in text messaging and performance on grammatical tasks, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 4, (415), (2014).
  • , Cell Phones in the Classroom, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30, 1, (11), (2013).
  • , Undergraduates' use of text messaging language: Effects of country and collection method, Writing Systems Research, 4, 2, (167), (2012).