Volume 28, Issue 3

CUSUM of Squares‐Based Tests for a Change in Persistence

Stephen Leybourne

University of Nottingham and Yonsei University

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Taylor

University of Nottingham and Yonsei University

Search for more papers by this author
Tae‐Hwan Kim

University of Nottingham and Yonsei University

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 October 2006
Citations: 42
Steve Leybourne, School of Economics, The Sir Clive Granger Building, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. E‐mail: steve.leybourne@nottingham.ac.uk

Abstract

Abstract. Using standardized cumulative sums of squared sub‐sample residuals, we propose a new ratio‐based test of the null hypothesis that a time series exhibits no change in its persistence structure [specifically that it displays constant I(1) behaviour] against the alternative of a change in persistence from trend stationarity to difference stationarity, or vice versa. Neither the direction nor location of any possible change under the alternative hypothesis need be assumed known. A key feature of our proposed test which distinguishes it from extant tests for persistence change [certain of which test the null hypothesis of constant I(0) behaviour while others, like our proposed test, test the null hypothesis of constant I(1) behaviour] is that it displays no tendency to spuriously over‐reject when applied to series which, although not constant I(1) series, do not display a change in persistence [specifically are constant I(0) processes]. Moreover, where our ratio test correctly rejects the null of no persistence change, the tail in which the rejection occurs can also be used to identify the direction of change since, even in relatively small samples, the test almost never rejects in the right [left] tail when there is a change from I(0) to I(1) [I(1) to I(0)]. Again this useful property is not shared by existing tests. As a by‐product of our analysis, we also propose breakpoint estimators which are consistent where the timing of the change in persistence is unknown.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 42

  • Distinguishing between breaks in the mean and breaks in persistence under long memory, Economics Letters, 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109338, 193, (109338), (2020).
  • Monitoring memory parameter change-points in long-memory time series, Empirical Economics, 10.1007/s00181-020-01840-4, (2020).
  • Semiparametric Detection of Changes in Long Range Dependence, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 10.1111/jtsa.12448, 40, 5, (693-706), (2019).
  • memochange: An R package for estimation procedures and tests for persistent time series, Journal of Open Source Software, 10.21105/joss.01820, 4, 43, (1820), (2019).
  • The memory of stock return volatility: Asset pricing implications, Journal of Financial Markets, 10.1016/j.finmar.2019.01.002, (2019).
  • Liquidity risk and the covered bond market in times of crisis: empirical evidence from Germany, Annals of Operations Research, 10.1007/s10479-019-03326-8, (2019).
  • Do Global Crude Oil Markets Behave as One Great Pool? A Cyclical Analysis, Journal of Business Cycle Research, 10.1007/s41549-018-0028-y, 14, 2, (219-241), (2018).
  • Replicating rockets and feathers, Energy Economics, 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.021, (2018).
  • Unemployment rate hysteresis and the great recession: exploring the metropolitan evidence, Empirical Economics, 10.1007/s00181-017-1361-z, 56, 1, (61-79), (2017).
  • The persistence in real interest rates: Does it solve the intertemporal consumption behavior puzzle?, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 10.1016/j.intfin.2017.08.009, 50, (36-51), (2017).
  • Changes in persistence, spurious regressions and the Fisher hypothesis, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 10.1515/snde-2015-0062, 21, 3, (2017).
  • Sieve bootstrap monitoring for change from short to long memory, Economics Letters, 10.1016/j.econlet.2015.12.023, 140, (53-56), (2016).
  • (Testing of Changes in Persistence and Their Effect on the Forecasting Quality), SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2762232, (2016).
  • An investigation of regime shifts in UK commercial property returns: a time series analysis, Applied Economics, 10.1080/00036846.2015.1080805, 47, 60, (6479-6492), (2015).
  • Is there a structural change in the persistence of WTI–Brent oil price spreads in the post-2010 period?, Economic Modelling, 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.06.007, 50, (64-71), (2015).
  • Interest rate convergence in the EMS prior to European Monetary Union, Journal of Policy Modeling, 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.08.002, 37, 6, (990-1004), (2015).
  • Structural Change and Monitoring Tests, Handbook of Financial Econometrics and Statistics, 10.1007/978-1-4614-7750-1, (873-902), (2015).
  • Signalling the Dotcom bubble: A multiple changes in persistence approach, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 10.1016/j.qref.2014.08.006, 55, (77-86), (2015).
  • Monitoring Change in Persistence Against the Null of Difference-Stationarity in Infinite Variance Observations, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 10.1080/03610918.2013.765469, 44, 1, (71-87), (2014).
  • Testing for a break in the persistence in yield spreads of EMU government bonds, Journal of Banking & Finance, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.01.003, 41, (109-118), (2014).
  • Testing for persistence change in fractionally integrated models: An application to world inflation rates, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2012.07.021, 76, (502-522), (2014).
  • Ratio Tests for Persistence Change with Heavy Tailed Observations, Journal of Networks, 10.4304/jnw.9.6.1409-1415, 9, 6, (2014).
  • DETECTION OF NONCONSTANT LONG MEMORY PARAMETER, Econometric Theory, 10.1017/S0266466613000303, 29, 5, (1009-1056), (2013).
  • Detection of Stationary Errors in Multiple Regressions with Integrated Regressors and Cointegration, Sequential Analysis, 10.1080/07474946.2013.803815, 32, 3, (319-349), (2013).
  • Monitoring persistent change in a heavy-tailed sequence with polynomial trends, Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 10.1016/j.jkss.2013.02.004, 42, 4, (497-506), (2013).
  • Unemployment Rate Hysteresis and the Great Recession: Exploring the Metropolitan Evidence, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2298877, (2013).
  • On the dynamics of inflation persistence around the world, Empirical Economics, 10.1007/s00181-012-0575-3, 44, 3, (1243-1265), (2012).
  • WALD TESTS FOR DETECTING MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN PERSISTENCE, Econometric Theory, 10.1017/S0266466612000357, 29, 2, (289-323), (2012).
  • Long memory and changing persistence, Economics Letters, 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.10.026, 114, 3, (268-272), (2012).
  • Monitoring persistence change in infinite variance observations, Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 10.1016/j.jkss.2011.06.001, 41, 1, (61-73), (2012).
  • Bootstrap testing multiple changes in persistence for a heavy-tailed sequence, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2012.01.011, 56, 7, (2303-2316), (2012).
  • Ratio-based estimators for a change point in persistence, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.05.024, 171, 1, (24-31), (2012).
  • undefined, 2012 9th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 10.1109/FSKD.2012.6234076, (1023-1027), (2012).
  • Testing for a rational bubble under long memory, Quantitative Finance, 10.1080/14697688.2011.578151, 12, 11, (1723-1732), (2012).
  • Multiple Changes in Persistence vs. Explosive Behaviour: The Dotcom Bubble, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2035033, (2012).
  • On European monetary integration and the persistence of real effective exchange rates, Finance Research Letters, 10.1016/j.frl.2010.06.001, 8, 1, (45-50), (2011).
  • Testing for a break in persistence under long-range dependencies and mean shifts, Statistical Papers, 10.1007/s00362-010-0342-5, 53, 2, (357-370), (2010).
  • Detecting changes from short to long memory, Statistical Papers, 10.1007/s00362-009-0292-y, 52, 4, (847-870), (2009).
  • Testing for a break in persistence under long‐range dependencies, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 10.1111/j.1467-9892.2009.00611.x, 30, 3, (263-285), (2009).
  • SIMPLE, ROBUST, AND POWERFUL TESTS OF THE BREAKING TREND HYPOTHESIS, Econometric Theory, 10.1017/S0266466608090385, 25, 4, (995-1029), (2009).
  • The dynamics of persistence in US inflation, Economics Letters, 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.07.016, 105, 2, (168-172), (2009).
  • Interest Rate Convergence in the EMS Prior to European Monetary Union, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.1413110, (2009).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.