Volume 29, Issue 2

Bootstrap Unit‐Root Tests: Comparison and Extensions

First published: 25 February 2008
Citations: 41
Franz C. Palm, Department of Quantitative Economics, Universiteit Maastricht, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. E‐mail: f.palm@ke.unimaas.nl

Abstract

Abstract. In this article, we study and compare the properties of several bootstrap unit‐root tests recently proposed in the literature. The tests are Dickey–Fuller (DF) or Augmented DF, based either on residuals from an autoregression and the use of the block bootstrap or on first‐differenced data and the use of the stationary bootstrap or sieve bootstrap. We extend the analysis by interchanging the data transformations (differences vs. residuals), the types of bootstrap and the presence or absence of a correction for autocorrelation in the tests.

We show that two sieve bootstrap tests based on residuals remain asymptotically valid. In contrast to the literature which focuses on a comparison of the bootstrap tests with an asymptotic test, we compare the bootstrap tests among themselves using response surfaces for their size and power in a simulation study.

This study leads to the following conclusions: (i) augmented DF tests are always preferred to standard DF tests; (ii) the sieve bootstrap performs better than the block bootstrap; (iii) difference‐based tests appear to have slightly better size properties, but residual‐based tests appear more powerful.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 41

  • Unit Roots and Cointegration, Macroeconomic Forecasting in the Era of Big Data, 10.1007/978-3-030-31150-6_17, (541-584), (2020).
  • Testing for explosive bubbles in the presence of autocorrelated innovations, Journal of Empirical Finance, 10.1016/j.jempfin.2020.06.002, 58, (207-225), (2020).
  • The fast iterated bootstrap, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.04.025, (2020).
  • Linear process bootstrap unit root test, Statistics & Probability Letters, 10.1016/j.spl.2018.08.006, 145, (74-80), (2019).
  • Testing for boundary conditions in case of fractionally integrated processes, Statistical Methods & Applications, 10.1007/s10260-019-00474-w, (2019).
  • Did the unemployment rates converge in the EU?, Empirical Economics, 10.1007/s00181-019-01678-5, (2019).
  • On bootstrap implementation of likelihood ratio test for a unit root, Economics Letters, 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.07.030, 171, (154-158), (2018).
  • Bootstrap Model Averaging Unit Root Inference, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3156028, (2018).
  • A New Non-Parametric Subspace-Based Approach for Unit Root Test, Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 10.1142/S0219477519500093, (1950009), (2018).
  • BOOTSTRAP-ASSISTED UNIT ROOT TESTING WITH PIECEWISE LOCALLY STATIONARY ERRORS, Econometric Theory, 10.1017/S0266466618000038, (1-25), (2018).
  • Bootstrap procedures for variance breaks test in time series with a changing trend, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 10.1080/03610926.2017.1377256, 47, 18, (4609-4627), (2017).
  • Testing for Explosive Bubbles in the Presence of Autocorrelated Innovations, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2916616, (2017).
  • Robust Dickey–Fuller tests based on ranks for time series with additive outliers, Metrika, 10.1007/s00184-016-0594-8, 80, 1, (115-131), (2016).
  • Finite Sample Critical Values of the Generalized KPSS Stationarity Test, Computational Economics, 10.1007/s10614-016-9586-z, 50, 1, (161-172), (2016).
  • Does knowledge spill over across borders and technology regimes?, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 10.1007/s11123-016-0472-4, 46, 1, (63-82), (2016).
  • A Gini-based unit root test, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2014.08.012, 100, (763-772), (2016).
  • Unit Root Tests: The Role of the Univariate Models Implied by Multivariate Time Series, Econometrics, 10.3390/econometrics4020021, 4, 4, (21), (2016).
  • Stationary bootstrapping for semiparametric panel unit root tests, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2014.09.004, 83, (14-25), (2015).
  • Maximum Non-Extensive Entropy Block Bootstrap for Non-Stationary Processes, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2588500, (2015).
  • Maximum Non-Extensive Entropy Block Bootstrap for Non-stationary Processes, L'Actualité économique, 10.7202/1036916ar, 91, 1-2, (115), (2015).
  • Does Purchasing Power Parity hold? New evidence from wild-bootstrapped nonlinear unit root tests in the presence of heteroskedasticity, Economic Modelling, 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.029, 36, (161-171), (2014).
  • Regression I, Climate Time Series Analysis, 10.1007/978-3-319-04450-7_4, (107-167), (2014).
  • Correlation, Climate Time Series Analysis, 10.1007/978-3-319-04450-7_7, (271-319), (2014).
  • Persistence Models, Climate Time Series Analysis, 10.1007/978-3-319-04450-7_2, (31-60), (2014).
  • A HYBRID BOOTSTRAP APPROACH TO UNIT ROOT TESTS, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 10.1111/jtsa.12019, 35, 4, (299-321), (2013).
  • On the Applicability of the Sieve Bootstrap in Time Series Panels*, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 10.1111/obes.12005, 76, 1, (139-151), (2013).
  • On the power of bootstrap tests for stationarity: a Monte Carlo comparison, Empirical Economics, 10.1007/s00181-013-0711-8, 46, 3, (973-998), (2013).
  • Bootstrap tests for fractional integration and cointegration: A comparison study, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 10.1016/j.matcom.2012.11.011, 87, (19-29), (2013).
  • Detrending Bootstrap Unit Root Tests, Econometric Reviews, 10.1080/07474938.2012.690693, 32, 8, (869-891), (2013).
  • Stationary bootstrapping for cointegrating regressions, Statistics & Probability Letters, 10.1016/j.spl.2012.10.007, 83, 2, (474-480), (2013).
  • Bootstrap Point Optimal Unit Root Tests, Journal of Time Series Econometrics, 10.1515/jtse-2013-0006, 6, 1, (1-31), (2013).
  • Truncated Product Methods for Panel Unit Root Tests*, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2012.00705.x, 75, 4, (624-636), (2012).
  • Speculative bubbles in agricultural commodity markets, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 10.1093/erae/jbs017, 40, 2, (217-238), (2012).
  • Unit root bootstrap tests under infinite variance, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 10.1111/j.1467-9892.2011.00737.x, 33, 1, (32-47), (2011).
  • BOOTSTRAP UNION TESTS FOR UNIT ROOTS IN THE PRESENCE OF NONSTATIONARY VOLATILITY, Econometric Theory, 10.1017/S0266466611000387, 28, 2, (422-456), (2011).
  • Bootstrapping asset price bubbles, Economic Modelling, 10.1016/j.econmod.2011.07.009, 28, 6, (2488-2493), (2011).
  • Bootstrapping I(1) data, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.01.010, 158, 2, (280-284), (2010).
  • Persistence Models, Climate Time Series Analysis, 10.1007/978-90-481-9482-7_2, (33-64), (2010).
  • A SIEVE BOOTSTRAP TEST FOR COINTEGRATION IN A CONDITIONAL ERROR CORRECTION MODEL, Econometric Theory, 10.1017/S0266466609990053, 26, 03, (647-681), (2009).
  • Modified fast double sieve bootstraps for ADF tests, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2009.07.008, 53, 12, (4490-4499), (2009).
  • Bootstrap M Unit Root Tests , Econometric Reviews, 10.1080/07474930802467167, 28, 5, (393-421), (2009).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.