Volume 75, Issue 1

Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects

Sergio Firpo

Dept. de Economia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Marquês de São Vicente, 225‐Gávea, 22453 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil firpo@econ.puc‐rio.brhttp://www.econ.puc‐rio.br/firpo/homepage_puc.htm

This paper is based on the second chapter of my Ph.D. dissertation at UC—Berkeley, written under the supervision of Guido Imbens and Jim Powell. I am indebted to them for their advice, support, and many suggestions. I am grateful for helpful comments from two anonymous referees and the co‐editor on earlier drafts. I have also benefited from comments from Marcelo Fernandes, Fernando Ferreira, Carlos Flores, Gustavo Gonzaga, Jinyong Hahn, Michael Jansson, Shakeeb Khan, David Lee, Thomas Lemieux, Thierry Magnac, Rosa Matzkin, Dan McFadden, João Pinho de Mello, Deb Nolan, David Reinstein, James Robins, Paul Ruud, Jeffrey Wooldridge, and participants of seminars at EPGE‐FGV, Georgetown, MSU, PUC‐Rio, UBC, UC—Berkeley, UC—Davis, University of Miami, University of Toronto, University of Washington, CESG‐2004, and USP‐RP. Special thanks go to Geert Ridder for many detailed suggestions. Financial support from CAPES—Brazil is acknowledged. All errors are mine.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 January 2007
Citations: 247

Abstract

This paper develops estimators for quantile treatment effects under the identifying restriction that selection to treatment is based on observable characteristics. Identification is achieved without requiring computation of the conditional quantiles of the potential outcomes. Instead, the identification results for the marginal quantiles lead to an estimation procedure for the quantile treatment effect parameters that has two steps: nonparametric estimation of the propensity score and computation of the difference between the solutions of two separate minimization problems. Root‐N consistency, asymptotic normality, and achievement of the semiparametric efficiency bound are shown for that estimator. A consistent estimation procedure for the variance is also presented. Finally, the method developed here is applied to evaluation of a job training program and to a Monte Carlo exercise. Results from the empirical application indicate that the method works relatively well even for a data set with limited overlap between treated and controls in the support of covariates. The Monte Carlo study shows that, for a relatively small sample size, the method produces estimates with good precision and low bias, especially for middle quantiles.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 247

  • Market-based environmental regulation and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese enterprises, Economic Modelling, 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.03.006, (2020).
  • A Mann–Whitney test of distributional effects in a multivalued treatment, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/j.jspi.2020.03.002, (2020).
  • Validation of the SF12 mental and physical health measure for the population from a low-income country in sub-Saharan Africa, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10.1186/s12955-020-01323-1, 18, 1, (2020).
  • Joint low‐complexity nonlinear equalization and carrier frequency offset compensation for multiple‐input multiple‐output orthogonal frequency division multiplexing communication systems, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 10.1002/ett.3874, 31, 6, (2020).
  • FastLORS: Joint modelling for expression quantitative trait loci mapping in R, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.265, 9, 1, (2020).
  • A bivariate life distribution and notions of negative dependence, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.276, 9, 1, (2020).
  • Improvement of chicken plasma protein hydrolysate angiotensin I‐converting enzyme inhibitory activity by optimizing plastein reaction, Food Science & Nutrition, 10.1002/fsn3.1572, 8, 6, (2798-2808), (2020).
  • Some recent developments in modeling quantile treatment effects, Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities, 10.1007/s11766-020-3980-y, 35, 2, (220-243), (2020).
  • A note on the applicability of the standard nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for combined incident and prevalent cohort data, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.280, 9, 1, (2020).
  • Buy flexible, pay more: The role of temporary contracts on wage inequality, Labour Economics, 10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101814, (101814), (2020).
  • Conjugate Bayesian unit‐level modelling of count data under informative sampling designs, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.267, 9, 1, (2020).
  • Change‐point analysis in financial networks, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.269, 9, 1, (2020).
  • A note on consistency of Bayesian high‐dimensional variable selection under a default prior, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.282, 9, 1, (2020).
  • A comparison of some conformal quantile regression methods, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.261, 9, 1, (2020).
  • Estimation and inference for functional linear regression models with partially varying regression coefficients, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.286, 9, 1, (2020).
  • Piecewise exponential models with time‐varying effects: Estimating mortality after listing for solid organ transplant, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.264, 9, 1, (2020).
  • Some copula‐based tests of independence among several random variables having arbitrary probability distributions, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.263, 9, 1, (2020).
  • All that Glitters Is not Gold. Effects of Working from Home on Income Inequality at the Time of COVID-19, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3597996, (2020).
  • Quantile treatment effects and bootstrap inference under covariate‐adaptive randomization, Quantitative Economics, 10.3982/QE1323, 11, 3, (957-982), (2020).
  • The Impact of BMI on Mental Health: Further Evidence from Genetic Markers, Economics & Human Biology, 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100895, (100895), (2020).
  • A practical generalized propensity-score estimator for quantile continuous treatment effects, The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 10.1177/1536867X20930997, 20, 2, (276-296), (2020).
  • Bounds on distributional treatment effect parameters using panel data with an application on job displacement, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.02.005, (2020).
  • Card-Sales Response to Merchant Contactless Payment Acceptance, Journal of Banking & Finance, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105938, (105938), (2020).
  • Distributional Effects of a Continuous Treatment with an Application on Intergenerational Mobility, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 10.1111/obes.12355, 82, 4, (808-842), (2020).
  • Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.06.003, (2020).
  • Parametric identification of the joint distribution of the potential outcomes, Stat, 10.1002/sta4.254, 9, 1, (2020).
  • The Mode is the Message: Using Predata as Exclusion Restrictions to Evaluate Survey Design, Essays in Honor of Cheng Hsiao, 10.1108/S0731-905320200000041012, (341-357), (2020).
  • Panel Data Quantile Regression for Treatment Effect Models, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3512436, (2020).
  • Quantile structural treatment effects: application to smoking wage penalty and its determinants, Econometric Reviews, 10.1080/07474938.2020.1770994, (1-20), (2020).
  • Treatment effects beyond the mean using distributional regression: Methods and guidance, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0226514, 15, 2, (e0226514), (2020).
  • Quantile-Based Subgroup Identification for Randomized Clinical Trials, Statistics in Biosciences, 10.1007/s12561-020-09286-z, (2020).
  • Ethnicity differentials in academic achievements: the role of time investments, Journal of Population Economics, 10.1007/s00148-020-00774-6, (2020).
  • Direct and Indirect Effects—An Information Theoretic Perspective, Entropy, 10.3390/e22080854, 22, 8, (854), (2020).
  • Working from home and income inequality: risks of a ‘new normal’ with COVID-19, Journal of Population Economics, 10.1007/s00148-020-00800-7, (2020).
  • Estimation of Conditional Average Treatment Effects with High-Dimensional Data, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10.1080/07350015.2020.1811102, (1-39), (2020).
  • Does Access to Rural Credit Help Decrease Income Inequality in Brazil?, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 10.1017/aae.2020.11, (1-21), (2020).
  • A closed-form estimator for quantile treatment effects with endogeneity, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.11.017, (2019).
  • Specification tests for the propensity score, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.02.002, (2019).
  • Contributions of Skills to the Racial Wage Gap, Journal of Human Capital, 10.1086/704322, 13, 3, (479-518), (2019).
  • Partial identification of the treatment effect distribution and its functionals, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.012, (2019).
  • Non-separable models with high-dimensional data, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.06.004, (2019).
  • References, Data Science for Business and Decision Making, 10.1016/B978-0-12-811216-8.10000-X, (1195-1214), (2019).
  • Is the pen mightier than the keyboard? The effect of online testing on measured student achievement, Economics of Education Review, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.12.007, 68, (89-103), (2019).
  • Heterogeneous earnings effects of the Job Corps by gender: A translated quantile approach, Labour Economics, 10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101760, (101760), (2019).
  • A note on the robustness of quantile treatment effect estimands, Economics Letters, 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108703, (108703), (2019).
  • Collective action and heterogeneous welfare effects: Evidence from Ethiopian villages, World Development Perspectives, 10.1016/j.wdp.2019.100150, (100150), (2019).
  • Dynamic Quantile Models of Rational Behavior, Econometrica, 10.3982/ECTA15146, 87, 6, (1893-1939), (2019).
  • Quantile treatment effects in difference in differences models with panel data, Quantitative Economics, 10.3982/QE935, 10, 4, (1579-1618), (2019).
  • Quantile Regression Methods, Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics, 10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6, (1-15), (2019).
  • Financial incentives and physician prescription behavior: Evidence from dispensing regulations, Health Economics, 10.1002/hec.3893, 28, 9, (1114-1129), (2019).
  • Accounting for the permanent vs temporary wage gaps among young adults: Three European countries in perspective, International Labour Review, 10.1111/ilr.12075, 158, 2, (337-364), (2019).
  • Les disparités salariales entre effectifs permanents et effectifs temporaires chez les jeunes, dans trois pays européens, Revue internationale du Travail, 10.1111/ilrf.12125, 158, 2, (369-400), (2019).
  • Medición de la brecha salarial entre jóvenes con contrato indefinido o temporal. Tres países europeos en perspectiva, Revista Internacional del Trabajo, 10.1111/ilrs.12125, 138, 2, (361-390), (2019).
  • Probability Density Rank-Based Quantization for Convex Universal Learning Machines, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2935502, (1-14), (2019).
  • Card-Sales Response to Merchant Contactless Payment Acceptance: Causal Evidence, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3459419, (2019).
  • Efficient Estimation of Counterfactual Distributions and Testing Distributional Treatment Effects, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3382968, (2019).
  • Personalized Mobile Targeting with User Engagement Stages: Combining a Structural Hidden Markov Model and Field Experiment, Information Systems Research, 10.1287/isre.2018.0831, (2019).
  • Quantile treatment effect estimation with dimension reduction, Statistical Theory and Related Fields, 10.1080/24754269.2019.1696645, (1-12), (2019).
  • Is there an informal employment wage penalty in Egypt? Evidence from quantile regression on panel data, Empirical Economics, 10.1007/s00181-019-01651-2, (2019).
  • Identifying Heterogeneous Treatment Effects of Drug Policy in Quasi-experimental Settings, Current Epidemiology Reports, 10.1007/s40471-019-00213-5, (2019).
  • Inference on finite-population treatment effects under limited overlap, The Econometrics Journal, 10.1093/ectj/utz017, (2019).
  • Oil at work: natural resource effects on household well-being in Ghana, Empirical Economics, 10.1007/s00181-019-01774-6, (2019).
  • Threat of grade retention, remedial education and student achievement: evidence from upper secondary schools in Italy, Empirical Economics, 10.1007/s00181-018-1443-6, 56, 2, (651-678), (2018).
  • Actual and counterfactual growth incidence and delta Lorenz curves: Estimation and inference, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10.1002/jae.2663, 34, 3, (385-402), (2018).
  • REDUCING PUBLIC‐PRIVATE SECTOR PAY DIFFERENTIALS: THE SINGLE SPINE PAY POLICY AS A NATURAL EXPERIMENT IN GHANA, Economic Inquiry, 10.1111/ecin.12694, 57, 1, (283-315), (2018).
  • Quantile continuous treatment effects, Econometrics and Statistics, 10.1016/j.ecosta.2017.10.004, 8, (13-36), (2018).
  • Inference on Finite Population Treatment Effects Under Limited Overlap, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3128546, (2018).
  • Quantile treatment effects in difference in differences models under dependence restrictions and with only two time periods, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.06.008, 206, 2, (395-413), (2018).
  • Doubly Robust Difference-in-Differences Estimators, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3293315, (2018).
  • Robust and efficient estimation for the treatment effect in causal inference and missing data problems, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.03.017, 205, 2, (363-380), (2018).
  • Efficient propensity score regression estimators of multivalued treatment effects for the treated, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.02.002, 204, 2, (207-222), (2018).
  • Multiple Testing and the Distributional Effects of Accountability Incentives in Education, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3266793, (2018).
  • Behavioral responses and welfare reform: Evidence from a randomized experiment, Labour Economics, 10.1016/j.labeco.2018.08.002, 54, (135-151), (2018).
  • The selection and quantile treatment effects on the economic returns of green buildings, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.11.002, (2018).
  • Weak convergence of local quantile treatment effect processes, Economics Letters, 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.10.021, 162, (49-52), (2018).
  • Unions, workers, and wages at the peak of the American labor movement, Explorations in Economic History, 10.1016/j.eeh.2017.08.003, 68, (95-118), (2018).
  • Testing for Rank Invariance or Similarity in Program Evaluation, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 10.1162/REST_a_00686, 100, 1, (78-85), (2018).
  • Tell Me Something I Don’t Already Know: Informedness and the Impact of Information Programs, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 10.1162/rest_a_00695, 100, 3, (510-527), (2018).
  • Does enforcement deter cartels? A tale of two tails, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.04.005, 59, (372-405), (2018).
  • The evolution of the gender test score gap through seventh grade: new insights from Australia using unconditional quantile regression and decomposition, IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 10.1186/s40172-018-0062-y, 7, 1, (2018).
  • Econometric Methods for Program Evaluation, Annual Review of Economics, 10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053402, 10, 1, (465-503), (2018).
  • Covariate Distribution Balance via Propensity Scores, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3258551, (2018).
  • A quantile correlated random coefficients panel data model, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.06.004, 206, 2, (305-335), (2018).
  • Decomposing Differences in Portfolio Returns between North America and Europe, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3216303, (2018).
  • Who succeeds in distance learning? Evidence from quantile panel data estimation, Southern Economic Journal, 10.1002/soej.12264, 84, 4, (1129-1145), (2018).
  • A Bayesian nonparametric approach to causal inference on quantiles, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12863, 74, 3, (986-996), (2018).
  • Who benefits from which agricultural research-for-development technologies? Evidence from farm household poverty analysis in Central Africa, World Development, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.013, 108, (28-46), (2018).
  • Estimation of Multivalued Treatment Effects under Conditional Independence, The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 10.1177/1536867X1301300301, 13, 3, (407-450), (2018).
  • Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects with Stata, The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 10.1177/1536867X1001000309, 10, 3, (423-457), (2018).
  • Decomposing Wage Distributions Using Recentered Influence Function Regressions, Econometrics, 10.3390/econometrics6020028, 6, 2, (28), (2018).
  • The Gender Gap Between Earnings Distributions, Journal of Political Economy, 10.1086/701788, (2018).
  • PROPERTIES OF DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATORS WHEN NUISANCE FUNCTIONS ARE ESTIMATED NONPARAMETRICALLY, Econometric Theory, 10.1017/S0266466618000385, (1-40), (2018).
  • Multi-valued Double Robust quantile treatment effect, Empirical Economics, 10.1007/s00181-018-1584-7, (2018).
  • Uniform Inference on Quantile Effects under Sharp Regression Discontinuity Designs, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10.1080/07350015.2017.1407323, (1-23), (2018).
  • Reassessing the effects of bilateral tax treaties on US FDI activity, Journal of Economics and Finance, 10.1007/s12197-017-9400-3, 42, 3, (451-470), (2017).
  • Likelihood Inference on Semiparametric Models: Average Derivative and Treatment Effect, The Japanese Economic Review, 10.1111/jere.12167, 69, 2, (133-155), (2017).
  • Maternal breastfeeding and children's cognitive development, Social Science & Medicine, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.012, 187, (101-108), (2017).
  • Does coffee production reduce poverty? Evidence from Uganda, Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 10.1108/JADEE-01-2016-0004, 7, 3, (260-274), (2017).
  • The Selection and Quantile Treatment Effects on the Economic Returns of Green Buildings, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2976364, (2017).
  • What can we learn about the racial gap in the presence of sample selection?, Journal of Econometrics, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2017.05.004, 199, 2, (117-130), (2017).
  • See more

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.