Volume 24, Issue 1

Killer Robots

ROBERT SPARROW

School of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 March 2007
Citations: 187
Robert Sparrow, School of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia. E-mail address: Robert.Sparrow@arts.monash.edu.au

Abstract

abstract  The United States Army's Future Combat Systems Project, which aims to manufacture a ‘robot army’ to be ready for deployment by 2012, is only the latest and most dramatic example of military interest in the use of artificially intelligent systems in modern warfare. This paper considers the ethics of the decision to send artificially intelligent robots into war, by asking who we should hold responsible when an autonomous weapon system is involved in an atrocity of the sort that would normally be described as a war crime. A number of possible loci of responsibility for robot war crimes are canvassed: the persons who designed or programmed the system, the commanding officer who ordered its use, the machine itself. I argue that in fact none of these are ultimately satisfactory. Yet it is a necessary condition for fighting a just war, under the principle of jus in bellum, that someone can be justly held responsible for deaths that occur in the course of the war. As this condition cannot be met in relation to deaths caused by an autonomous weapon system it would therefore be unethical to deploy such systems in warfare.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 187

  • Design for Values in the Armed Forces: Nonlethal Weapons and Military Robots, Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, 10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6, (1-22), (2021).
  • Weapons Research is Morally Wrong, New Advancements in Swarm Algorithms: Operators and Applications, 10.1007/978-3-030-16860-5_3, (29-46), (2020).
  • Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and the Evolving Nature of Work, Digital Transformation in Business and Society, 10.1007/978-3-030-08277-2, (127-143), (2020).
  • The Law of Armed Conflict Issues Created by Programming Automatic Target Recognition Systems Using Deep Learning Methods, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Volume 21 (2018), 10.1007/978-94-6265-343-6_4, (99-135), (2020).
  • When Scientists Become Activists: The International Committee for Robot Arms Control and the Politics of Killer Robots, Global Activism and Humanitarian Disarmament, 10.1007/978-3-030-27611-9, (27-58), (2020).
  • Robot Ethicsロボットの倫理, Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 10.7210/jrsj.38.18, 38, 1, (18-22), (2020).
  • Technological Moral Luck, Technology, Anthropology, and Dimensions of Responsibility, 10.1007/978-3-476-04896-7_9, (115-132), (2020).
  • Algorithmic Decision-Making and the Problem of Control, Technology, Anthropology, and Dimensions of Responsibility, 10.1007/978-3-476-04896-7_8, (97-113), (2020).
  • Artificial Intelligence in Extended Minds: Intrapersonal Diffusion of Responsibility and Legal Multiple Personality, Technology, Anthropology, and Dimensions of Responsibility, 10.1007/978-3-476-04896-7_12, (159-176), (2020).
  • Can We Forgive a Robot?, Technology, Anthropology, and Dimensions of Responsibility, 10.1007/978-3-476-04896-7_11, (147-157), (2020).
  • The Responsibility Quantification Model of Human Interaction With Automation, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10.1109/TASE.2020.2965466, 17, 2, (1044-1060), (2020).
  • Maschinenethik und Philosophie, Handbuch Maschinenethik, 10.1007/978-3-658-17484-2_3-2, (1-23), (2020).
  • Artificial Life, Journal of Macromarketing, 10.1177/0276146719897361, (027614671989736), (2020).
  • New Frontiers of Profit and Risk: The Fourth Industrial Revolution’s Impact on Business and Human Rights, New Political Economy, 10.1080/13563467.2020.1723514, (1-18), (2020).
  • Autonomous weapons systems and the moral equality of combatants, Ethics and Information Technology, 10.1007/s10676-020-09528-0, (2020).
  • Socially responsive technologies: toward a co-developmental path, AI & SOCIETY, 10.1007/s00146-020-00982-4, (2020).
  • A Normative Approach to Artificial Moral Agency, Minds and Machines, 10.1007/s11023-020-09525-8, (2020).
  • Customizable Ethics Settings for Building Resilience and Narrowing the Responsibility Gap: Case Studies in the Socio-Ethical Engineering of Autonomous Systems, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10.1007/s11948-020-00221-5, (2020).
  • The artificial view: toward a non-anthropocentric account of moral patiency, Ethics and Information Technology, 10.1007/s10676-020-09540-4, (2020).
  • Mein Haus, mein Auto, mein Roboter?, Maschinenethik, 10.1007/978-3-658-21083-0_4, (57-72), (2019).
  • Sharing Responsibility with a Machine, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 10.1016/j.socec.2019.02.010, (2019).
  • Moral Responsibility of Robots and Hybrid Agents, The Monist, 10.1093/monist/onz009, 102, 2, (259-275), (2019).
  • Autonome Waffensysteme/Kriegsroboter, Handbuch Filmtheorie, 10.1007/978-3-658-17484-2_20-1, (1-16), (2019).
  • Maschinenethik und Philosophie, Handbuch Filmtheorie, 10.1007/978-3-658-17484-2_3-1, (1-23), (2019).
  • What Do Human Rights Really Say About the Use of Autonomous Weapons Systems for Law Enforcement Purposes?, Use and Misuse of New Technologies, 10.1007/978-3-030-05648-3, (55-72), (2019).
  • Who Is to Blame for Autonomous Weapons Systems’ Misdoings?, Use and Misuse of New Technologies, 10.1007/978-3-030-05648-3, (211-232), (2019).
  • AI in the Sky: How People Morally Evaluate Human and Machine Decisions in a Lethal Strike Dilemma, Robotics and Well-Being, 10.1007/978-3-030-12524-0_11, (111-133), (2019).
  • Autonome Systeme und ethische Reflexion, Die Maschine: Freund oder Feind?, 10.1007/978-3-658-22954-2, (135-158), (2019).
  • Kapitel XIV Völkerstrafrecht – Individuelle Verantwortlichkeit, Dehumanisierung der Kriegführung, 10.1007/978-3-662-57856-8, (501-529), (2019).
  • Maschinenethik und Philosophie, Handbuch Maschinenethik, 10.1007/978-3-658-17483-5, (33-55), (2019).
  • Maschinenethik und Technikethik, Handbuch Maschinenethik, 10.1007/978-3-658-17483-5, (145-163), (2019).
  • Learning How to Behave, Handbuch Maschinenethik, 10.1007/978-3-658-17483-5, (255-278), (2019).
  • Autonome Waffensysteme/Kriegsroboter, Handbuch Maschinenethik, 10.1007/978-3-658-17483-5, (319-334), (2019).
  • Moral Values Related to Autonomous Weapon Systems: An Empirical Survey that Reveals Common Ground for the Ethical Debate, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 10.1109/MTS.2019.2948439, 38, 4, (34-44), (2019).
  • Von den three laws of robotics zur Roboterethik, Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion, 10.1007/978-3-476-05604-7, (345-351), (2019).
  • Mind the Gaps: Assuring the Safety of Autonomous Systems from an Engineering, Ethical, and Legal Perspective, Artificial Intelligence, 10.1016/j.artint.2019.103201, (103201), (2019).
  • The deadly diffusion of lethal technologies, Science, 10.1126/science.aaz4545, 366, 6467, (810-810), (2019).
  • Should we be afraid of medical AI?, Journal of Medical Ethics, 10.1136/medethics-2018-105281, 45, 8, (556-558), (2019).
  • Lethal Military Robots, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, 10.4018/978-1-5225-8365-3, (394-411), (2019).
  • Autonomous Systems in a Military Context (Part 2), Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, 10.4018/978-1-5225-8365-3, (433-451), (2019).
  • Smart Robots – Smart Ethics?, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD, 10.1007/s11623-019-1118-2, 43, 6, (332-341), (2019).
  • Naval robots and rescue, International Review of the Red Cross, 10.1017/S181638311800067X, (1-21), (2019).
  • Robots in the Workplace: a Threat to—or Opportunity for—Meaningful Work?, Philosophy & Technology, 10.1007/s13347-019-00377-4, (2019).
  • Can a Robot Be a Good Colleague?, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10.1007/s11948-019-00172-6, (2019).
  • Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10.1007/s11948-019-00146-8, (2019).
  • The Retribution-Gap and Responsibility-Loci Related to Robots and Automated Technologies: A Reply to Nyholm, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10.1007/s11948-019-00120-4, (2019).
  • Distributive justice as an ethical principle for autonomous vehicle behavior beyond hazard scenarios, Ethics and Information Technology, 10.1007/s10676-019-09504-3, (2019).
  • Norms Are What Machines Make of Them: Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Normative Implications of Human-Machine Interactions, International Political Sociology, 10.1093/ips/olz023, (2019).
  • Meaningful human control as reason-responsiveness: the case of dual-mode vehicles, Ethics and Information Technology, 10.1007/s10676-019-09519-w, (2019).
  • Responsibility for Killer Robots, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10.1007/s10677-019-10007-9, (2019).
  • Debunking (the) Retribution (Gap), Science and Engineering Ethics, 10.1007/s11948-019-00148-6, (2019).
  • Robots and Political Economy, The Political Economy of Robots, 10.1007/978-3-319-51466-6, (1-16), (2018).
  • Dehumanization: Is There a Legal Problem Under Article 36?, Dehumanization of Warfare, 10.1007/978-3-319-67266-3, (21-52), (2018).
  • Learning How to Behave, Handbuch Maschinenethik, 10.1007/978-3-658-17484-2_17-1, (1-24), (2018).
  • Maschinenethik und Technikethik, Handbuch Maschinenethik, 10.1007/978-3-658-17484-2, (1-19), (2018).
  • “Trust but Verify”: The Difficulty of Trusting Autonomous Weapons Systems, Journal of Military Ethics, 10.1080/15027570.2018.1481907, 17, 1, (2-20), (2018).
  • Cyber-Technology, Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction, 10.1007/978-3-319-92606-3_7, (91-104), (2018).
  • Globalization, Security, and Drones, Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9, (2732-2740), (2018).
  • Autonomous Weapon Systems - An Alleged Responsibility Gap, Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence 2017, 10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_32, (302-313), (2018).
  • Autonomous Weapon Systems: Failing the Principle of Discrimination, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 10.1109/MTS.2018.2795119, 37, 1, (55-61), (2018).
  • The ethics of crashes with self‐driving cars: A roadmap, II, Philosophy Compass, 10.1111/phc3.12506, 13, 7, (2018).
  • Pros and Cons of Autonomous Weapons Systems (with Oren Etzioni), Happiness is the Wrong Metric, 10.1007/978-3-319-69623-2_16, (253-263), (2018).
  • Lethal Military Robots, The Changing Scope of Technoethics in Contemporary Society, 10.4018/978-1-5225-5094-5.ch006, (106-123), (2018).
  • Drone Proliferation and the Challenge of Regulating Dual-Use Technologies, International Studies Review, 10.1093/isr/viy047, (2018).
  • Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 10.3389/frobt.2018.00015, 5, (2018).
  • Just research into killer robots, Ethics and Information Technology, 10.1007/s10676-018-9472-6, (2018).
  • Attributing Agency to Automated Systems: Reflections on Human–Robot Collaborations and Responsibility-Loci, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10.1007/s11948-017-9943-x, 24, 4, (1201-1219), (2017).
  • Nehal Bhuta, Susanne Beck, Robin Geiß, Hin-Yan Liu and Claus Kreß (eds). Autonomous Weapons Systems: Law, Ethics, Policy, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10.1007/s10677-017-9830-1, 20, 4, (931-933), (2017).
  • Exploring the Ethical Landscape of Robot-Assisted Search and Rescue, A World with Robots, 10.1007/978-3-319-46667-5_7, (93-107), (2017).
  • Clarifying the Language of Lethal Autonomy in Military Robots, A World with Robots, 10.1007/978-3-319-46667-5_13, (171-183), (2017).
  • Killing by Autonomous Vehicles and the Legal Doctrine of Necessity, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10.1007/s10677-017-9780-7, 20, 2, (411-429), (2017).
  • Regulating Autonomous Systems: Beyond Standards, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 10.1109/MIS.2017.1, 32, 1, (88-91), (2017).
  • Globalization, Security and Drones, Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5, (1-9), (2017).
  • On the legal responsibility of autonomous machines, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 10.1007/s10506-017-9207-8, 25, 3, (293-304), (2017).
  • Zur ethischen Beurteilung automatisierter und autonomer Waffensysteme, Handbuch Friedensethik, 10.1007/978-3-658-14686-3, (793-804), (2017).
  • Rüstung, Rüstungskontrolle und internationale Politik, Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen, 10.1007/978-3-531-19918-4, (959-990), (2017).
  • Normal Autonomous Accidents: What Happens When Killer Robots Fail?, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3161446, (2017).
  • An Evaluation Schema for the Ethical Use of Autonomous Robotic Systems in Security Applications, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3063617, (2017).
  • Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.12.008, 100, (48-54), (2017).
  • Mind the gap: responsible robotics and the problem of responsibility, Ethics and Information Technology, 10.1007/s10676-017-9428-2, (2017).
  • From responsible robotics towards a human rights regime oriented to the challenges of robotics and artificial intelligence, Ethics and Information Technology, 10.1007/s10676-017-9443-3, (2017).
  • Short circuit: retracing the political for the age of ‘autonomous’ weapons, Critical Military Studies, 10.1080/23337486.2017.1384978, (1-18), (2017).
  • Preventing Optimific Wrongings, Utilitas, 10.1017/S0953820816000388, 29, 4, (453-473), (2016).
  • Artificial agents among us: Should we recognize them as agents proper?, Ethics and Information Technology, 10.1007/s10676-016-9411-3, 19, 1, (1-17), (2016).
  • Robots and Respect: A Response to Robert Sparrow, Ethics & International Affairs, 10.1017/S0892679416000277, 30, 03, (391), (2016).
  • Ethical Concerns in Human Enhancement, Leadership and Personnel Management, 10.4018/978-1-4666-9624-2, (119-144), (2016).
  • Human Action in the Loop, Effective Standardization Management in Corporate Settings, 10.4018/978-1-4666-9737-9.ch016, (352-368), (2016).
  • Robots, law and the retribution gap, Ethics and Information Technology, 10.1007/s10676-016-9403-3, 18, 4, (299-309), (2016).
  • Robots and Respect: Assessing the Case Against Autonomous Weapon Systems, Ethics & International Affairs, 10.1017/S0892679415000647, 30, 1, (93-116), (2016).
  • Drones, Morality, and Vulnerability: Two Arguments Against Automated Killing, The Future of Drone Use, 10.1007/978-94-6265-132-6_12, (229-237), (2016).
  • Rethinking Military Virtue Ethics in an Age of Unmanned Weapons, Journal of Military Ethics, 10.1080/15027570.2016.1257851, 15, 3, (187-204), (2016).
  • Robots as “Evil Means”? A Rejoinder to Jenkins and Purves, Ethics & International Affairs, 10.1017/S0892679416000289, 30, 3, (401-403), (2016).
  • undefined, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451743, (125-132), (2016).
  • War Roboethics, Roboethics, 10.1007/978-3-319-21714-7_9, (139-153), (2016).
  • Key dialectics in cloud services, ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 10.1145/2874239.2874247, 45, 3, (52-59), (2016).
  • Just War and Robots’ Killings, The Philosophical Quarterly, 10.1093/pq/pqv075, 66, 263, (302-322), (2015).
  • The autonomy-safety-paradox of service robotics in Europe and Japan: a comparative analysis, AI & SOCIETY, 10.1007/s00146-015-0630-7, 31, 4, (501-517), (2015).
  • Autonomous Machines, Moral Judgment, and Acting for the Right Reasons, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10.1007/s10677-015-9563-y, 18, 4, (851-872), (2015).
  • Design for responsibility: safeguarding moral perception via a partnership architecture, Cognition, Technology & Work, 10.1007/s10111-015-0329-z, 17, 3, (319-328), (2015).
  • Political accountability and autonomous weapons, Research & Politics, 10.1177/2053168015606749, 2, 4, (205316801560674), (2015).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.