Volume 15, Issue 2 p. 191-203
Full Access

Family rituals in married couples: Links with attachment, relationship quality, and closeness

CARLA CRESPO

Corresponding Author

University of Lisbon

Carla Crespo is now at the Roy McKenzie Centre for the Study of Families, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

Carla Crespo, Roy McKenzie Centre for the Study of Families, P.O. Box 600, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand, e‐mail: carla.crespo@vuw.ac.nz.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 May 2008
Citations: 24

Carla Crespo and Isabel Narciso, Department of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; M. Emilia Costa, Department of Psychology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Garth J. O. Fletcher, Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Carla Crespo is now at the Roy McKenzie Centre for the Study of Families, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

This study is part of the Ph.D. research of the first author; a grant from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia supported it. The first author thanks Alice Boyes, Nickola Overall, and Myron Friesen from the Relationship Research Group in the Psychology Department at the University of Canterbury, New Zealand, for their support and feedback on this research.

Abstract

This study examined the association between self‐reports of family rituals and relationship attachment, relationship quality, and closeness in 150 married couples in Portugal. Using structural equation modeling to examine both within‐individual and across‐partner effects, the results were generally as predicted. First, lower levels of avoidant attachment were related to greater family investment in rituals. Second, greater family investment in rituals was associated with more positive relationship quality and closeness. Third, family investment in rituals partially mediated the link between avoidance and relationship quality and closeness. Fourth, the mediational models were significant for women but not for men. These results highlight the importance of links among family interactions, couple interactions, and individual differences.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.