Volume 66, Issue 1

Improved Logrank‐Type Tests for Survival Data Using Adaptive Weights

Song Yang

Corresponding Author

Office of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive MSC 7913, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, U.S.A.

email: yangso@nhlbi.nih.gov

email: rprentic@whi.org

Search for more papers by this author
Ross Prentice

Corresponding Author

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3‐A410, Seattle, Washington 98109, U.S.A.

email: yangso@nhlbi.nih.gov

email: rprentic@whi.org

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 March 2010
Citations: 38

Abstract

Summary For testing for treatment effects with time‐to‐event data, the logrank test is the most popular choice and has some optimality properties under proportional hazards alternatives. It may also be combined with other tests when a range of nonproportional alternatives are entertained. We introduce some versatile tests that use adaptively weighted logrank statistics. The adaptive weights utilize the hazard ratio obtained by fitting the model of Yang and Prentice (2005, Biometrika 92, 1–17). Extensive numerical studies have been performed under proportional and nonproportional alternatives, with a wide range of hazard ratios patterns. These studies show that these new tests typically improve the tests they are designed to modify. In particular, the adaptively weighted logrank test maintains optimality at the proportional alternatives, while improving the power over a wide range of nonproportional alternatives. The new tests are illustrated in several real data examples.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 38

  • Pharmacokinetics and safety of IBI301 versus rituximab in patients with CD20+ B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-020-68360-0, 10, 1, (2020).
  • A Practical Overview and Reporting Strategies for Statistical Analysis of Survival Studies, Chest, 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.015, 158, 1, (S39-S48), (2020).
  • Note on the role of the placebo group in the short‐term and long‐term hazard ratio model, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8424, 39, 20, (2685-2688), (2020).
  • Optimality of testing procedures for survival data in the nonproportional hazards setting, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.13315, 0, 0, (2020).
  • More powerful logrank permutation tests for two-sample survival data, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 10.1080/00949655.2020.1773463, (1-19), (2020).
  • Some Meaningful Weighted Log-Rank and Weighted Win Loss Statistics, Statistics in Biosciences, 10.1007/s12561-020-09273-4, (2020).
  • Assessing Treatment Benefit in Immuno-oncology, Statistics in Biosciences, 10.1007/s12561-020-09268-1, (2020).
  • Alternative Analysis Methods for Time to Event Endpoints Under Nonproportional Hazards: A Comparative Analysis, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2019.1697738, (1-12), (2020).
  • K -sample omnibus non-proportional hazards tests based on right-censored data , Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280220907355, (096228022090735), (2020).
  • The Short-Term and Long-Term Hazard Ratio Model: Parameterization Inconsistency, The American Statistician, 10.1080/00031305.2020.1740786, (1-7), (2020).
  • Comparison of survival distributions in clinical trials: A practical guidance, Clinical Trials, 10.1177/1740774520928614, (174077452092861), (2020).
  • Clinical risk prediction with random forests for survival, longitudinal, and multivariate (RF-SLAM) data analysis, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10.1186/s12874-019-0863-0, 20, 1, (2019).
  • Modestly weighted logrank tests, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8186, 38, 20, (3782-3790), (2019).
  • Wild bootstrap logrank tests with broader power functions for testing superiority, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2019.02.001, (2019).
  • Factorial analyses of treatment effects under independent right-censoring, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280219831316, (096228021983131), (2019).
  • Z max test for delayed effect in immuno-oncology clinical trials , Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2019.1632873, (1-23), (2019).
  • Interim monitoring using the adaptively weighted log‐rank test in clinical trials for survival outcomes, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7958, 38, 4, (601-612), (2018).
  • Improving testing and description of treatment effect in clinical trials with survival outcomes, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7676, 38, 4, (530-544), (2018).
  • Is it time for the weighted log-rank test to play a more important role in confirmatory trials?, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.09.007, 10, (A1-A2), (2018).
  • A flexible and coherent test/estimation procedure based on restricted mean survival times for censored time‐to‐event data in randomized clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7661, 37, 15, (2307-2320), (2018).
  • A new modeling and inference approach for the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial outcomes, Clinical Trials, 10.1177/1740774518769865, 15, 3, (305-312), (2018).
  • Predictive Modeling of Hospital Mortality for Patients With Heart Failure by Using an Improved Random Survival Forest, IEEE Access, 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2789898, 6, (7244-7253), (2018).
  • Interim Analyses: Design and Analysis Considerations for Survival Trials When Hazards May Be Nonproportional, Biopharmaceutical Applied Statistics Symposium, 10.1007/978-981-10-7829-3_14, (347-376), (2018).
  • Versatile Tests for Comparing Survival Curves Based on Weighted Log-rank Statistics, The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 10.1177/1536867X1601600308, 16, 3, (678-690), (2018).
  • Efficiency of two sample tests via the restricted mean survival time for analyzing event time observations, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12770, 74, 2, (694-702), (2017).
  • On the Fleming–Harrington test for late effects in prevention randomized controlled trials, Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 10.1080/15598608.2017.1295889, 11, 3, (418-435), (2017).
  • Estimation of treatment effects in weighted log-rank tests, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.09.004, 8, (147-155), (2017).
  • Testing Treatment Effect in Randomized Clinical Trials With Possible Nonproportional Hazards, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2016.1257436, 9, 2, (204-211), (2017).
  • Partitioned log-rank tests for the overall homogeneity of hazard rate functions, Lifetime Data Analysis, 10.1007/s10985-016-9365-0, 23, 3, (400-425), (2016).
  • Comparison of multiple hazard rate functions, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12412, 72, 1, (39-45), (2015).
  • A versatile test for equality of two survival functions based on weighted differences of Kaplan–Meier curves, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.6591, 34, 28, (3680-3695), (2015).
  • The Influence of Biostatistics at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, The American Statistician, 10.1080/00031305.2015.1035962, 69, 2, (108-120), (2015).
  • An omnibus test for several hazard alternatives in prevention randomized controlled clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.6366, 34, 4, (541-557), (2014).
  • Weighted Logrank Permutation Tests for Randomly Right Censored Life Science Data, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 10.1111/sjos.12059, 41, 3, (742-761), (2014).
  • Logrank‐type tests with presmoothing, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201300193, 56, 5, (851-866), (2014).
  • Tests for comparing estimated survival functions, Biometrika, 10.1093/biomet/asu015, 101, 3, (535-552), (2014).
  • A jackknife-based versatile test for two-sample problems with right-censored data, Journal of Applied Statistics, 10.1080/02664763.2011.584524, 39, 2, (267-277), (2012).
  • Non-parametric estimation of relative risk in survival and associated tests, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280211431022, 24, 6, (856-870), (2011).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.