Causal Inference on Quantiles with an Obstetric Application
Abstract
Summary The current statistical literature on causal inference is primarily concerned with population means of potential outcomes, while the current statistical practice also involves other meaningful quantities such as quantiles. Motivated by the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL), a large observational study of obstetric labor progression, we propose and compare methods for estimating marginal quantiles of potential outcomes as well as quantiles among the treated. By adapting existing methods and techniques, we derive estimators based on outcome regression (OR), inverse probability weighting, and stratification, as well as a doubly robust (DR) estimator. By incorporating stratification into the DR estimator, we further develop a hybrid estimator with enhanced numerical stability at the expense of a slight bias under misspecification of the OR model. The proposed methods are illustrated with the CSL data and evaluated in simulation experiments mimicking the CSL.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 14
- W. Xiao, H. H. Zhang, W. Lu, Robust regression for optimal individualized treatment rules, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8102, 38, 11, (2059-2073), (2019).
- Steven J. Staffa, Daniel S. Kohane, David Zurakowski, Quantile Regression and Its Applications, Anesthesia & Analgesia, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004017, 128, 4, (820-830), (2019).
- Zhiwei Zhang, Shujie Ma, Changyu Shen, Chunling Liu, Estimating Mann–Whitney‐type Causal Effects, International Statistical Review, 10.1111/insr.12326, 87, 3, (514-530), (2019).
- Mariela Sued, Marina Valdora, Víctor Yohai, Robust doubly protected estimators for quantiles with missing data, TEST, 10.1007/s11749-019-00689-9, (2019).
- Ana M. Bianco, Graciela Boente, Wenceslao González-Manteiga, Ana Pérez-González, Plug-in marginal estimation under a general regression model with missing responses and covariates, TEST, 10.1007/s11749-018-0591-5, 28, 1, (106-146), (2018).
- Dandan Xu, Michael J. Daniels, Almut G. Winterstein, A Bayesian nonparametric approach to causal inference on quantiles, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12863, 74, 3, (986-996), (2018).
- Florencia Statti, Mariela Sued, Victor J. Yohai, High breakdown point robust estimators with missing data, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 10.1080/03610926.2017.1388396, 47, 21, (5145-5162), (2017).
- Iván Díaz, Efficient estimation of quantiles in missing data models, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/j.jspi.2017.05.001, 190, (39-51), (2017).
- J. Molina, A. Rotnitzky, M. Sued, J. M. Robins, Multiple robustness in factorized likelihood models, Biometrika, 10.1093/biomet/asx027, 104, 3, (561-581), (2017).
- Kristin A. Linn, Eric B. Laber, Leonard A. Stefanski, Interactive Q -Learning for Quantiles , Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2016.1155993, 112, 518, (638-649), (2017).
- Wei Liu, Zhiwei Zhang, Lei Nie, Guoxing Soon, A Case Study in Personalized Medicine: Rilpivirine Versus Efavirenz for Treatment-Naive HIV Patients, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2017.1280404, 112, 520, (1381-1392), (2017).
- Lan Wang, Yu Zhou, Rui Song, Ben Sherwood, Quantile-Optimal Treatment Regimes, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2017.1330204, (1-12), (2017).
- Zhiwei Zhang, Wei Liu, Bo Zhang, Li Tang, Jun Zhang, Causal inference with missing exposure information: Methods and applications to an obstetric study, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280213513758, 25, 5, (2053-2066), (2016).
- Jie Zhou, Zhiwei Zhang, Zhaohai Li, Jun Zhang, Coarsened Propensity Scores and Hybrid Estimators for Missing Data and Causal Inference, International Statistical Review, 10.1111/insr.12082, 83, 3, (449-471), (2014).




