Volume 68, Issue 3

Causal Inference on Quantiles with an Obstetric Application

Zhiwei Zhang

Corresponding Author

Division of Biostatistics, Office of Surveillance and Biometrics, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, U.S.A.

email: zhiwei.zhang@fda.hhs.govSearch for more papers by this author
Zhen Chen

Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
James F. Troendle

Office of Biostatistics Research, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Jun Zhang

MOE and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 December 2011
Citations: 14

Abstract

Summary The current statistical literature on causal inference is primarily concerned with population means of potential outcomes, while the current statistical practice also involves other meaningful quantities such as quantiles. Motivated by the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL), a large observational study of obstetric labor progression, we propose and compare methods for estimating marginal quantiles of potential outcomes as well as quantiles among the treated. By adapting existing methods and techniques, we derive estimators based on outcome regression (OR), inverse probability weighting, and stratification, as well as a doubly robust (DR) estimator. By incorporating stratification into the DR estimator, we further develop a hybrid estimator with enhanced numerical stability at the expense of a slight bias under misspecification of the OR model. The proposed methods are illustrated with the CSL data and evaluated in simulation experiments mimicking the CSL.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 14

  • Robust regression for optimal individualized treatment rules, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8102, 38, 11, (2059-2073), (2019).
  • Quantile Regression and Its Applications, Anesthesia & Analgesia, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004017, 128, 4, (820-830), (2019).
  • Estimating Mann–Whitney‐type Causal Effects, International Statistical Review, 10.1111/insr.12326, 87, 3, (514-530), (2019).
  • Robust doubly protected estimators for quantiles with missing data, TEST, 10.1007/s11749-019-00689-9, (2019).
  • Plug-in marginal estimation under a general regression model with missing responses and covariates, TEST, 10.1007/s11749-018-0591-5, 28, 1, (106-146), (2018).
  • A Bayesian nonparametric approach to causal inference on quantiles, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12863, 74, 3, (986-996), (2018).
  • High breakdown point robust estimators with missing data, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 10.1080/03610926.2017.1388396, 47, 21, (5145-5162), (2017).
  • Efficient estimation of quantiles in missing data models, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/j.jspi.2017.05.001, 190, (39-51), (2017).
  • Multiple robustness in factorized likelihood models, Biometrika, 10.1093/biomet/asx027, 104, 3, (561-581), (2017).
  • Interactive Q -Learning for Quantiles , Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2016.1155993, 112, 518, (638-649), (2017).
  • A Case Study in Personalized Medicine: Rilpivirine Versus Efavirenz for Treatment-Naive HIV Patients, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2017.1280404, 112, 520, (1381-1392), (2017).
  • Quantile-Optimal Treatment Regimes, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2017.1330204, (1-12), (2017).
  • Causal inference with missing exposure information: Methods and applications to an obstetric study, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280213513758, 25, 5, (2053-2066), (2016).
  • Coarsened Propensity Scores and Hybrid Estimators for Missing Data and Causal Inference, International Statistical Review, 10.1111/insr.12082, 83, 3, (449-471), (2014).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.