The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

The Employment Interview: The Role of Sex Stereotypes in the Evaluation of Male and Female Job Applicants in the Netherlands1

Nneues E. M. Van Vianen

Corresponding Author

University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to the first author, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychology, Roetersstraat 15,1018 WB Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Search for more papers by this author
Tineke M. Willemsen

University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: March 1992
Cited by: 23
1

The authors are grateful to Els van Schie for her assistance in this research project.

Abstract

This field study focused on the influence of sex stereotypes in the evaluation of male (N=38) and female (N=21) job applicants in the Netherlands. The employee selection process for higher‐level technical and academic jobs in real life situations was studied, with special attention to the assessment of applicants by members of selection committees. It was demonstrated that, according to the job interviewers, the ideal applicant had more masculine than feminine traits. Males and females were regarded as having the same qualifications for the job, but because male applicants were assessed as having more masculine characteristics and female applicants more feminine characteristics, the male applicants were accepted more often. The job interviewers acted according to a fit model: The applicant most similar in traits to the ideal applicant was hired for each job.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 23

  • , Sexual orientation discrimination in the United Kingdom’s labour market: A field experiment, Human Relations, 68, 11, (1769), (2015).
  • , The influence of cross-cultural differences on job interview selection decisions, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 18, (3512), (2013).
  • , Power tactic usage by gender at work and home: past, present, and future, International Journal of Conflict Management, 24, 3, (307), (2013).
  • , Ingratiation and Self‐Promotion in the Selection Interview: The Effects of Using Single Tactics or a Combination of Tactics on Interviewer Judgments, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 9, (2155-2169), (2010).
  • , Transparency in Academic Recruitment: A Problematic Tool for Gender Equality?, Organization Studies, 31, 11, (1459), (2010).
  • , Corporate Masculinity, A Companion to Gender Studies, (342-354), (2017).
  • , Am I the Right Candidate? Self-Ascribed Fit of Women and Men to a Leadership Position, Sex Roles, 10.1007/s11199-007-9380-4, 58, 9-10, (682-688), (2008).
  • , Effects of discriminatory interview questions and gender on applicant reactions, Journal of Business and Psychology, 10.1007/s10869-006-9024-7, 21, 2, (175-191), (2006).
  • , THE EFFECTS OF JOB STEREOTYPE, APPLICANT GENDER, AND COMMUNICATION STYLE ON RATINGS IN SCREENING INTERVIEWS, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11, 1, (67), (2003).
  • , BEYOND EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW VALIDITY: A COMPREHENSIVE NARRATIVE REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH AND TRENDS OVER TIME, Personnel Psychology, 55, 1, (1-81), (2006).
  • , The suitable few: managerial recruitment practices in the Norwegian state bureaucracy, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18, 2, (197), (2002).
  • , Das Erleben von Geschlechtsrollenkonflikten in geschlechtstypisierten Berufen, Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 45, 1, (34), (2001).
  • , Contemporary Sexism and Discrimination: The Importance of Respect for Men and Women, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1, (48), (2001).
  • , Interrelations among Gender-Role Conflict, Typicality of Occupations, and Self-Esteem, Psychological Reports, 89, 3, (489), (2001).
  • , Perceptions of women and men as entrepreneurs: Evidence for differential effects of attributional augmenting., Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 5, (923), (2001).
  • , INTERRELATIONS AMONG GENDER-ROLE CONFLICT, TYPICALITY OF OCCUPATIONS, AND SELF-ESTEEM, Psychological Reports, 10.2466/PR0.89.7.489-494, 89, 7, (489), (2001).
  • , Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change11We are grateful to Lotte Bailyn and our colleagues affiliated with the Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons Graduate School of Management – Gill Coleman, Joyce Fletcher, Deborah Kolb, Deborah Merrill-Sands, Rhona Rapoport, and Bridgette Sheridan – for their contributions to these ideas and for their foundational research, on which this paper builds. We also appreciate the feedback we received on an earlier draft from members of the FSC Research Group, Elaine Backman, Herminia Ibarra, Maureen Scully, and Kathleen Valley. We thank Joanne Martin and Barbara Reskin for their comments, which helped in our conceptual framing of the paper. Finally, we thank Bob Sutton and Barry Staw for their helpful suggestions. This research was funded in part by the Ford Foundation., Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, (103), (2000).
  • , The Effects of Sex and Ethnicity on Evaluations of Advertising Job Candidates: Do Stereotypes Predict Discrimination?, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 21, 1, (63), (1999).
  • , Architects: Gender-Role and Hiring Decisions, Psychological Reports, 81, 2, (667), (1997).
  • , ARCHITECTS: GENDER-ROLE AND HIRING DECISIONS, Psychological Reports, 10.2466/PR0.81.6.667-676, 81, 6, (667), (1997).
  • , Gender Differences in Managerial Intention, Gender, Work & Organization, 3, 2, (103-114), (2007).
  • , Overcoming managerial bias in employment interviewing, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 1, (75), (1995).
  • , Assessment of male and female behaviour in the employment interview, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 5, 4, (243), (1995).