The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Electrical impedance index in human skin: measurements after occlusion, in 5 anatomical regions and in mi Id irritant contact dermatitis

Lennart Emtestam

Corresponding Author

Department of Dermatology, Huddinge University Hospital, S‐141 S6 Huddinge. Sweden

Lennart Emtestam, Department of Dermatology M 43, Huddinge University Hospital, S‐14186 Huddinge, Sweden
Search for more papers by this author
Stig Ollmar

Center for Denial Technology and Biomaterials. Karolinskn Institute, P.O. Box 4064, S‐141 04 Huddinge, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: February 1993
Cited by: 28

Abstract

The electrical impedance in 23 healthy volunteers at 2–6 different skin sites was measured with a new impedance device, which makes possible non‐invasive local measurements to a controlled depth. In 11 subjects, the lest sites were occluded for 24 h using empty Finn Chambers and chambers with water, physiological saline, a paper disc or 0.002% sodium lauryl sulfate (SI.S). In the normal skin of 10 subjects, the electrical impedance was measured from 5 different body areas for 5 consecutive days. In 3 subjects, daily measurements for I month were done, both from normal skin and from skin following the application of 2% SLS. The results show that the irritation index based on electrical skin impedance gives little day‐to‐day variation at one and the same lest site, in comparison to the variations between different test sites on the same subject and the inter individual variations observed. Significant differences in impedance values between different anatomical regions of normal skin were found. Occlusion does not affect readings taken 24 h or later alter removal, but increases variance for readings taken 1 after removal. Effects on the skin of mild irritation and its recovery phase are easily monitored wslh the new device. Technology based on electrical impedance, in ils newly presented form, with the advantages of improved geometrical dellnilinn and depth control, can be used as an objective tool to measure skin irritation. For detection of subclinical irritant contact dermatitis, repeated readings taken over several days may be needed.

Number of times cited: 28

  • , Physical Methods to Measure Stratum Corneum Water Content In Vivo, Agache's Measuring the Skin, 10.1007/978-3-319-32383-1_29, (299-340), (2017).
  • , Influence of skin type, race, sex, and anatomic location on epidermal barrier function, Clinics in Dermatology, 30, 3, (269), (2012).
  • , Full-Body Skin Mapping for Six Biophysical Parameters: Baseline Values at 16 Anatomical Sites in 125 Human Subjects, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, 25, 1, (25), (2012).
  • , Iontophoretic Intradermal and Transdermal Drug Delivery, Transdermal and Intradermal Delivery of Therapeutic Agents, 10.1201/b10906-5, (81-129), (2011).
  • , Electrical impedance model for evaluation of skin irritation in rabbits and humans, Skin Research and Technology, 13, 3, (259-267), (2007).
  • Conference Proceedings. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society New York, NY 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE , (2006). 1-4244-0032-5 Assessment of Acute Skin Irritation in Rabbits Using Electrical Impedance Model , (2006). 1665 1668 4462090 , 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260104 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4462090/
  • , Relationship of Energy Settings and Impedance in Different Anatomic Areas Using a Radiofrequency Device, Dermatologic Surgery, 31, 12, (1668-1670), (2006).
  • , Relationship of Energy Settings and Impedance in Different Anatomic Areas Using a Radiofrequency Device, Dermatologic Surgery, 31, 12, (1668), (2005).
  • , Occlusion vs. Contact Dermatitis, Protective Gloves for Occupational Use, Second Edition, 10.3109/9780203506813-17, (219-228), (2013).
  • , Occlusion and Barrier Function, Dermatotoxicology, Sixth Edition, 10.1201/9780203426272.ch2, (13-27), (2010).
  • 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEMBS-03 Cancun, Mexico 17-21 Sept. 2003 Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439) IEEE , (2003). 0-7803-7789-3 Application of step response impedance spectroscopy for detection of skin irritation 3215 3217 , 10.1109/IEMBS.2003.1280827 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1280827/
  • , Impact of anatomical location on barrier recovery, surface pH and stratum corneum hydration after acute barrier disruption, British Journal of Dermatology, 146, 5, (770-776), (2002).
  • , Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview, Contact Dermatitis, 44, 4, (201-206), (2002).
  • , Intra‐individual variations in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses, Contact Dermatitis, 45, 2, (75-83), (2001).
  • , Regional variations in skin barrier function and cutaneous irritation due to iontophoresis in human subjects, Food and Chemical Toxicology, 39, 11, (1079), (2001).
  • , Electrical Bioimpedance Related to Structural Differences and Reactions in Skin and Oral Mucosa, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 873, 1, (221-226), (2006).
  • , On Assessment of Skin Reactivity Using Electrical Impedance, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 873, 1, (214-220), (2006).
  • , Methods of information extraction from impedance spectra of biological tissue, in particular skin and oral mucosa—a critical review and suggestions for the future, Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 45, 2, (157), (1998).
  • , Baseline electrical impedance measurements at various skin sites – related to age and sex, Skin Research and Technology, 3, 4, (252-258), (2006).
  • , EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods, Skin Research and Technology, 3, 2, (126-132), (2006).
  • , CLINICAL IRRITANT CONTACT DERMATITIS SYNDROMES, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, 17, 3, (365), (1997).
  • , Electric Impedance Measurements at Six Different Anatomic Locations of Macroscopically Normal Human Oral Mucosa, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 55, 2, (88), (1997).
  • , An electrical impedance technique for assessment of wheals, Allergy, 51, 12, (923-926), (2007).
  • , Variation in response of human skin to irritant challenge, Contact Dermatitis, 34, 2, (115-117), (2006).
  • , Correlation of impedance response patterns to histological findings in irritant skin reactions induced by various surfactants, British Journal of Dermatology, 134, 2, (221-228), (2008).
  • , Electrical impedance measured to five skin depths in mild irritant dermatitis induced by sodium lauryl sulphate, British Journal of Dermatology, 132, 5, (718-724), (2006).
  • , Skin irritation in man: a comparative bioengineering study using improved reflectance spectroscopy, Contact Dermatitis, 33, 5, (315-322), (2006).
  • , Electrical impedance compared with other non‐invasive bioengineering techniques and visual scoring for detection of irritation in human skin, British Journal of Dermatology, 130, 1, (29-36), (2006).