Open Access
The geographic scaling of biotic interactions
M. B. Araújo, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, UK, and Dept of Biogeography and Global Change, National Museum of Natural Sciences, CSIC, Calle José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, ES‐28006, Madrid, Spain, and Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Univ. of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK‐2100, Denmark. InBio/CIBIO, Univ. of Évora, Largo dos Colegiais, PT‐7000 Évora, Portugal. E‐mail: miguel.araujo@imperial.ac.uk
Abstract
A central tenet of ecology and biogeography is that the broad outlines of species ranges are determined by climate, whereas the effects of biotic interactions are manifested at local scales. While the first proposition is supported by ample evidence, the second is still a matter of controversy. To address this question, we develop a mathematical model that predicts the spatial overlap, i.e. co‐occurrence, between pairs of species subject to all possible types of interactions. We then identify the scale of resolution in which predicted range overlaps are lost. We found that co‐occurrence arising from positive interactions, such as mutualism (+/+) and commensalism (+/0), are manifested across scales. Negative interactions, such as competition (−/−) and amensalism (−/0), generate checkerboard patterns of co‐occurrence that are discernible at finer resolutions but that are lost and increasing scales of resolution. Scale dependence in consumer–resource interactions (+/−) depends on the strength of positive dependencies between species. If the net positive effect is greater than the net negative effect, then interactions scale up similarly to positive interactions. Our results challenge the widely held view that climate alone is sufficient to characterize species distributions at broad scales, but also demonstrate that the spatial signature of competition is unlikely to be discernible beyond local and regional scales.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 70
- Gang Feng, Hui Yan and Xueting Yang, Climate and food diversity as drivers of mammal diversity in Inner Mongolia, Ecology and Evolution, 9, 4, (2142-2148), (2019).
- Moisés A. Aguilera, Nelson Valdivia, Stuart Jenkins, Sergio A. Navarrete and Bernardo Broitman, Asymmetric competitive effects during species range expansion: An experimental assessment of interaction strength between “equivalent” grazer species in their range overlap, Journal of Animal Ecology, 88, 2, (277-289), (2018).
- Eva Delmas, Mathilde Besson, Marie‐Hélène Brice, Laura A. Burkle, Giulio V. Dalla Riva, Marie‐Josée Fortin, Dominique Gravel, Paulo R. Guimarães, David H. Hembry, Erica A. Newman, Jens M. Olesen, Mathias M. Pires, Justin D. Yeakel and Timothée Poisot, Analysing ecological networks of species interactions, Biological Reviews, 94, 1, (16-36), (2018).
- Facundo X. Palacio and Juan M. Girini, Biotic interactions in species distribution models enhance model performance and shed light on natural history of rare birds: a case study using the straight‐billed reedhaunter Limnoctites rectirostris, Journal of Avian Biology, 49, 11, (2018).
- Cyril Milleret, Andrés Ordiz, Guillaume Chapron, Harry Peter Andreassen, Jonas Kindberg, Johan Månsson, Aimee Tallian, Petter Wabakken, Camilla Wikenros, Barbara Zimmermann, Jon E. Swenson and Håkan Sand, Habitat segregation between brown bears and gray wolves in a human‐dominated landscape, Ecology and Evolution, 8, 23, (11450-11466), (2018).
- Brooks A. Kohli, Rebecca C. Terry and Rebecca J. Rowe, A trait‐based framework for discerning drivers of species co‐occurrence across heterogeneous landscapes, Ecography, 41, 12, (1921-1933), (2018).
- Damaris Zurell, Laura J. Pollock and Wilfried Thuiller, Do joint species distribution models reliably detect interspecific interactions from co‐occurrence data in homogenous environments?, Ecography, 41, 11, (1812-1819), (2018).
- Iulian Gherghel, François Brischoux and Monica Papeş, Using biotic interactions in broad‐scale estimates of species’ distributions, Journal of Biogeography, 45, 9, (2216-2225), (2018).
- Pierre‐Marc Brousseau, Dominique Gravel and Ira Tanya Handa, On the development of a predictive functional trait approach for studying terrestrial arthropods, Journal of Animal Ecology, 87, 5, (1209-1220), (2018).
- Manuela D'Amen, Heidi K. Mod, Nicholas J. Gotelli and Antoine Guisan, Disentangling biotic interactions, environmental filters, and dispersal limitation as drivers of species co‐occurrence, Ecography, 41, 8, (1233-1244), (2017).
- Erin M. Schliep, Nina K. Lany, Phoebe L. Zarnetske, Robert N. Schaeffer, Colin M. Orians, David A. Orwig, Evan L. Preisser and Antoine Guisan, Joint species distribution modelling for spatio‐temporal occurrence and ordinal abundance data, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 27, 1, (142-155), (2017).
- Pedro Aragón, Luis M. Carrascal and David Palomino, Macro‐spatial structure of biotic interactions in the distribution of a raptor species, Journal of Biogeography, 45, 8, (1859-1871), (2018).
- Wayne M. Getz, Charles R. Marshall, Colin J. Carlson, Luca Giuggioli, Sadie J. Ryan, Stephanie S. Romañach, Carl Boettiger, Samuel D. Chamberlain, Laurel Larsen, Paolo D’Odorico and David O’Sullivan, Making ecological models adequate, Ecology Letters, 21, 2, (153-166), (2017).
- David García‐Callejas, Roberto Molowny‐Horas and Miguel B. Araújo, Multiple interactions networks: towards more realistic descriptions of the web of life, Oikos, 127, 1, (5-22), (2017).
- Jedediah F. Brodie, Olga E. Helmy, Jayasilan Mohd‐Azlan, Alys Granados, Henry Bernard, Anthony J. Giordano and Elise Zipkin, Models for assessing local‐scale co‐abundance of animal species while accounting for differential detectability and varied responses to the environment, Biotropica, 50, 1, (5-15), (2017).
- A. J. Alaniz, A. A. Grez and T. Zaviezo, Potential spatial interaction of the invasive species Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) with native and endemic coccinellids, Journal of Applied Entomology, 142, 5, (513-524), (2018).
- Paige E. Copenhaver‐Parry and David M. Bell, Species interactions weakly modify climate‐induced tree co‐occurrence patterns, Journal of Vegetation Science, 29, 1, (52-61), (2018).
- Pierre‐Marc Brousseau, Dominique Gravel and I. Tanya Handa, Trait matching and phylogeny as predictors of predator–prey interactions involving ground beetles, Functional Ecology, 32, 1, (192-202), (2017).
- William Godsoe, Janet Franklin and F. Guillaume Blanchet, Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradients, Ecology and Evolution, 7, 2, (654-664), (2016).
- Nicholas P. McCann, Patrick A. Zollner and Jonathan H. Gilbert, Temporal scaling in analysis of animal activity, Ecography, 40, 12, (1436-1444), (2017).
- Paige E. Copenhaver‐Parry, Bryan N. Shuman and Daniel B. Tinker, Toward an improved conceptual understanding of North American tree species distributions, Ecosphere, 8, 6, (2017).
- Damaris Zurell, Integrating demography, dispersal and interspecific interactions into bird distribution models, Journal of Avian Biology, 48, 12, (1505-1516), (2017).
- Tiago Silveira Vasconcelos, Caio Pastana Antonelli and Marcelo Felgueiras Napoli, Mutualism influences species distribution predictions for a bromeliad‐breeding anuran under climate change, Austral Ecology, 42, 7, (869-877), (2017).
- Kun Song, Yichong Cui, Xijin Zhang, Yingji Pan, Junli Xu, Kaiqin Xu and Liangjun Da, Enhanced effects of biotic interactions on predicting multispecies spatial distribution of submerged macrophytes after eutrophication, Ecology and Evolution, 7, 19, (7719-7728), (2017).
- Miguel G. Matias, Cátia Lúcio Pereira, Pedro Miguel Raposeiro, Vítor Gonçalves, Ana Mafalda Cruz, Ana Cristina Costa and Miguel Bastos Araújo, Divergent trophic responses to biogeographic and environmental gradients, Oikos, 126, 1, (101-110), (2016).
- Hugo Saiz, Jesús Gómez‐Gardeñes, Paloma Nuche, Andrea Girón, Yolanda Pueyo and Concepción L. Alados, Evidence of structural balance in spatial ecological networks, Ecography, 40, 6, (733-741), (2016).
- Timothée Poisot, Cynthia Guéveneux‐Julien, Marie‐Josée Fortin, Dominique Gravel, Pierre Legendre and Petr Keil, Hosts, parasites and their interactions respond to different climatic variables, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26, 8, (942-951), (2017).
- Mikko Mönkkönen, Vincent Devictor, Jukka T. Forsman, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Merja Elo and Kathleen Lyons, Linking species interactions with phylogenetic and functional distance in European bird assemblages at broad spatial scales, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26, 8, (952-962), (2017).
- Brendan M. Rogers, Patrick Jantz and Scott J. Goetz, Vulnerability of eastern US tree species to climate change, Global Change Biology, 23, 8, (3302-3320), (2017).
- Avi Bar‐Massada and Jonathan Belmaker, Non‐stationarity in the co‐occurrence patterns of species across environmental gradients, Journal of Ecology, 105, 2, (391-399), (2017).
- Ryan C. Garrick, Zakee L. Sabree, Benjamin C. Jahnes and Jeffrey C. Oliver, Strong spatial‐genetic congruence between a wood‐feeding cockroach and its bacterial endosymbiont, across a topographically complex landscape, Journal of Biogeography, 44, 7, (1500-1511), (2017).
- Charles B. Yackulic, Competitive exclusion over broad spatial extents is a slow process: evidence and implications for species distribution modeling, Ecography, 40, 2, (305-313), (2016).
- Phillip P.A. Staniczenko, Prabu Sivasubramaniam, K. Blake Suttle and Richard G. Pearson, Linking macroecology and community ecology: refining predictions of species distributions using biotic interaction networks, Ecology Letters, 20, 6, (693-707), (2017).
- Otso Ovaskainen, Gleb Tikhonov, Anna Norberg, F. Guillaume Blanchet, Leo Duan, David Dunson, Tomas Roslin and Nerea Abrego, How to make more out of community data? A conceptual framework and its implementation as models and software, Ecology Letters, 20, 5, (561-576), (2017).
- Robert P. Anderson, When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?, Journal of Biogeography, 44, 1, (8-17), (2016).
- Heidi K. Mod, Risto K. Heikkinen, Peter C. Roux, Mary S. Wisz and Miska Luoto, Impact of biotic interactions on biodiversity varies across a landscape, Journal of Biogeography, 43, 12, (2412-2423), (2016).
- Kévin Cazelles, Nicolas Mouquet, David Mouillot and Dominique Gravel, On the integration of biotic interaction and environmental constraints at the biogeographical scale, Ecography, 39, 10, (921-931), (2016).
- Otso Ovaskainen, David B. Roy, Richard Fox and Barbara J. Anderson, Uncovering hidden spatial structure in species communities with spatially explicit joint species distribution models, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 4, (428-436), (2015).
- Florent Mazel, T. Jonathan Davies, Laure Gallien, Julien Renaud, Mathieu Groussin, Tamara Münkemüller and Wilfried Thuiller, Influence of tree shape and evolutionary time‐scale on phylogenetic diversity metrics, Ecography, 39, 10, (913-920), (2015).
- Ana M. C. Santos, Marcus V. Cianciaruso, Paulo De Marco and Robert Ricklefs, Global patterns of functional diversity and assemblage structure of island parasitoid faunas, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25, 7, (869-879), (2015).
- Stefan Koenigstein, Felix C Mark, Stefan Gößling‐Reisemann, Hauke Reuter and Hans‐Otto Poertner, Modelling climate change impacts on marine fish populations: process‐based integration of ocean warming, acidification and other environmental drivers, Fish and Fisheries, 17, 4, (972-1004), (2016).
- Bradley J. Butterfield and Seth M. Munson, Temperature is better than precipitation as a predictor of plant community assembly across a dryland region, Journal of Vegetation Science, 27, 5, (938-947), (2016).
- Pablo M. Lucas, Manuela González‐Suárez and Eloy Revilla, Toward multifactorial null models of range contraction in terrestrial vertebrates, Ecography, 39, 11, (1100-1108), (2016).
- Bruno H. P. Rosado, Marcos S. L. Figueiredo, Eduardo A. Mattos and Carlos E. V. Grelle, Eltonian shortfall due to the Grinnellian view: functional ecology between the mismatch of niche concepts, Ecography, 39, 11, (1034-1041), (2016).
- Heather R. Cunningham, Leslie J. Rissler, Lauren B. Buckley and Mark C. Urban, Abiotic and biotic constraints across reptile and amphibian ranges, Ecography, 39, 1, (1-8), (2015).
- Ilona Naujokaitis‐Lewis and Marie‐Josée Fortin, Spatio‐temporal variation of biotic factors underpins contemporary range dynamics of congeners, Global Change Biology, 22, 3, (1201-1213), (2015).
- Florent Mazel, Julien Renaud, François Guilhaumon, David Mouillot, Dominique Gravel and Wilfried Thuiller, Mammalian phylogenetic diversity–area relationships at a continental scale, Ecology, 96, 10, (2814-2822), (2015).
- Torben Wittwer, Robert B. O'Hara, Paul Caplat, Thomas Hickler and Henrik G. Smith, Long‐term population dynamics of a migrant bird suggests interaction of climate change and competition with resident species, Oikos, 124, 9, (1151-1159), (2015).
- D. Stralberg, S. M. Matsuoka, A. Hamann, E. M. Bayne, P. Sólymos, F. K. A. Schmiegelow, X. Wang, S. G. Cumming and S. J. Song, Projecting boreal bird responses to climate change: the signal exceeds the noise, Ecological Applications, 25, 1, (52-69), (2015).
- Alexander Royan, Christel Prudhomme, David M. Hannah, S. James Reynolds, David G. Noble and Jonathan P. Sadler, Climate-induced changes in river flow regimes will alter future bird distributions, Ecosphere, 6, 4, (art50), (2015).
- William Godsoe, Rua Murray and Michael J. Plank, The effect of competition on species' distributions depends on coexistence, rather than scale alone, Ecography, 38, 11, (1071-1079), (2015).
- Diederik Strubbe, Olivier Beauchard and Erik Matthysen, Niche conservatism among non‐native vertebrates in Europe and North America, Ecography, 38, 3, (321-329), (2014).
- Daniel M. Griffith, T. Michael Anderson, Colin P. Osborne, Caroline A. E. Strömberg, Elisabeth J. Forrestel and Christopher J. Still, Biogeographically distinct controls on C3 and C4 grass distributions: merging community and physiological ecology, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24, 3, (304-313), (2014).
- Irena Šímová, Cyrille Violle, Nathan J. B. Kraft, David Storch, Jens‐Christian Svenning, Brad Boyle, John C. Donoghue, Peter Jørgensen, Brian J. McGill, Naia Morueta‐Holme, William H. Piel, Robert K. Peet, Jim Regetz, Mark Schildhauer, Nick Spencer, Barbara Thiers, Susan Wiser and Brian J. Enquist, Shifts in trait means and variances in North American tree assemblages: species richness patterns are loosely related to the functional space, Ecography, 38, 7, (649-658), (2014).
- Pieter T. J. Johnson, Richard S. Ostfeld and Felicia Keesing, Frontiers in research on biodiversity and disease, Ecology Letters, 18, 10, (1119-1133), (2015).
- M. Parida, A. A. Hoffmann and M. P. Hill, Climate change expected to drive habitat loss for two key herbivore species in an alpine environment, Journal of Biogeography, 42, 7, (1210-1221), (2015).
- Jonathan Belmaker, Phoebe Zarnetske, Mao‐Ning Tuanmu, Sara Zonneveld, Sydne Record, Angela Strecker and Lydia Beaudrot, Empirical evidence for the scale dependence of biotic interactions, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24, 7, (750-761), (2015).
- Daniel R. Schlaepfer, Kyle A. Taylor, Victoria E. Pennington, Kellen N. Nelson, Trace E. Martyn, Caitlin M. Rottler, William K. Lauenroth and John B. Bradford, Simulated big sagebrush regeneration supports predicted changes at the trailing and leading edges of distribution shifts, Ecosphere, 6, 1, (1-31), (2015).
- Wilfried Thuiller, Laura J. Pollock, Maya Gueguen and Tamara Münkemüller, From species distributions to meta‐communities, Ecology Letters, 18, 12, (1321-1328), (2015).
- Basil V. Iannone, Christopher M. Oswalt, Andrew M. Liebhold, Qinfeng Guo, Kevin M. Potter, Gabriela C. Nunez‐Mir, Sonja N. Oswalt, Bryan C. Pijanowski and Songlin Fei, Region‐specific patterns and drivers of macroscale forest plant invasions, Diversity and Distributions, 21, 10, (1181-1192), (2015).
- Falko T. Buschke, Luc Brendonck and Bram Vanschoenwinkel, Simple mechanistic models can partially explain local but not range‐wide co‐occurrence of African mammals, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24, 7, (762-773), (2015).
- Sabela Lois, David E. Cowley, Adolfo Outeiro, Eduardo San Miguel, Rafaela Amaro and Paz Ondina, Spatial extent of biotic interactions affects species distribution and abundance in river networks: the freshwater pearl mussel and its hosts, Journal of Biogeography, 42, 2, (229-240), (2014).
- S. Normand, N. E. Zimmermann, F. M. Schurr and H. Lischke, Demography as the basis for understanding and predicting range dynamics, Ecography, 37, 12, (1149-1154), (2014).
- Yanning Qiu, Shuqing N. Teng, Yong Zhang, Joana Santana, Jens‐Christian Svenning, Luís Reino, Sabastián Abades, Haozhi Ma, Luojun Yang, Yiqian Wu, Zheng Y. X. Huang and Chi Xu, The resolution‐dependent role of landscape attributes in shaping macro‐scale biodiversity patterns, Global Ecology and Biogeography, , (2019).
- Nicholas M. Fountain‐Jones, Craig Packer, Maude Jacquot, F. Guillaume Blanchet, Karen Terio and Meggan E. Craft, Endemic infection can shape exposure to novel pathogens: Pathogen co‐occurrence networks in the Serengeti lions, Ecology Letters, , (2019).
- Katharine R. Hendry, Alan O. Marron, Flora Vincent, Daniel J. Conley, Marion Gehlen, Federico M. Ibarbalz, Bernard Quéguiner and Chris Bowler, Competition between Silicifiers and Non-silicifiers in the Past and Present Ocean and Its Evolutionary Impacts, Frontiers in Marine Science, 10.3389/fmars.2018.00022, 5, (2018).
- Paulo Vallejos-Garrido, Reinaldo Rivera, Oscar Inostroza-Michael, Enrique Rodríguez-Serrano and Cristián E. Hernández, Historical dynamics and current environmental effects explain the spatial distribution of species richness patterns of New World monkeys, PeerJ, 10.7717/peerj.3850, 5, (e3850), (2017).
- Felipe Vivallo, Bruno Vilela and Daniel Paiva Silva, Inferring host-cleptoparasite complexes of South American Centridine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) using macroecological perspectives, Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 10.1007/s13127-019-00394-3, (2019).
- Annina Kaisa Johanna Niskanen, Pekka Niittynen, Juha Aalto, Henry Väre and Miska Luoto, Lost at high latitudes: Arctic and endemic plants under threat as climate warms, Diversity and Distributions, , (2019).
- Jeremy S. Simmonds, Berndt J. Rensburg, Ayesha I. T. Tulloch and Martine Maron, Landscape‐specific thresholds in the relationship between species richness and natural land cover, Journal of Applied Ecology, , (2019).
