The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

DEGREES OF DISENCHANTMENT: A REVIEW ESSAY

Mark Brenneman

Corresponding Author

Department of Education, Culture, and Society University of Utah

MARK BRENNEMAN is a Doctoral Student in the Department of Education, Culture, and Society at the University of Utah, 1705 E. Campus Center Dr., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112; e‐mail <mark.brenneman@utah.edu>. His primary areas of scholarship include the philosophical foundations of education, curriculum theory, critical pedagogy, critical theory, and political theology.

FRANK MARGONIS is Professor in the Department of Education, Culture, and Society at the University of Utah, 1705 E. Campus Center Dr., Rm. 307, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112‐9256; e‐mail <frank.margonis@utah.edu>. His primary areas of scholarship are relational and critical pedagogies, phenomenological and Marxist philosophies, and educational policy.

Search for more papers by this author
Frank Margonis

Corresponding Author

Department of Education, Culture, and Society University of Utah

MARK BRENNEMAN is a Doctoral Student in the Department of Education, Culture, and Society at the University of Utah, 1705 E. Campus Center Dr., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112; e‐mail <mark.brenneman@utah.edu>. His primary areas of scholarship include the philosophical foundations of education, curriculum theory, critical pedagogy, critical theory, and political theology.

FRANK MARGONIS is Professor in the Department of Education, Culture, and Society at the University of Utah, 1705 E. Campus Center Dr., Rm. 307, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112‐9256; e‐mail <frank.margonis@utah.edu>. His primary areas of scholarship are relational and critical pedagogies, phenomenological and Marxist philosophies, and educational policy.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 April 2012
Cited by: 1

Abstract

In this review essay, Mark Brenneman and Frank Margonis address three recent book‐length contributions to the ongoing discussion around cosmopolitanism and educational thought: Mark Olssen's Liberalism, Neoliberalism, Social Democracy: Thin Communitarian Perspectives on Political Philosophy and Education, Sharon Todd's Toward an Imperfect Education: Facing Humanity, Rethinking Cosmopolitanism, and Ilan Gur‐Ze’ev's Beyond the Modern‐Postmodern Struggle in Education: Toward Counter‐Education and Enduring Improvisation. Brenneman and Margonis argue that these contributions exhibit a marked disenchantment with Enlightenment conceptions of human possibilities as these inform concrete recommendations in the field of the philosophy of education. All three books call for a rethinking of modernist categories in educational thought, a call that is supported by the authors' respective distrust and ultimate disenchantment with the residual presence of ideas of human perfectibility harbored in the philosophical categories that animate discussions in multicultural, liberal, neoliberal, and postmodern educational discussion. Brenneman and Margonis argue that each of these books theorizes from its own respective regionally specific circumstances, and they therefore prove valuable to philosophers of education who struggle toward their own local responses to human difference and the pedagogical possibilities of educational relations.

Number of times cited: 1

  • , Fanon’s other children: psychopolitical and pedagogical implications, Race Ethnicity and Education, 20, 1, (42), (2017).