Professional Training in Applied Psychology: Towards a Signature Pedagogy for Forensic Psychology Training
Abstract
Forensic Psychology is a recognised and important sub‐specialty of the Psychology discipline. However, after an expansion in the number of training places that were offered when programmes were first developed, recent years have seen these diminish in response to changes in university policies, resulting from reformulated Federal government funding models. In this article, we argue that it is important for the future of specialist areas of professional psychology to not only articulate the core skills and competencies that are associated with specialist practice but also to develop unique and distinctive approaches to teaching and learning signature pedagogies. Based on the premise that forensic psychological practice is, indeed, a distinctive activity that requires different skills and, importantly, different ways of thinking about the work from other areas of professional psychology, it is suggested that professional training in this area should aim to develop a signature pedagogy which combines methods of teaching and learning that have been developed in legal training programmes with principles of problem‐based learning.
Number of times cited: 3
- Sally Wiggins, Eva Hammar Chiriac, Gunvor Larsson Abbad, Regina Pauli and Marcia Worrell, Ask Not Only ‘What Can Problem-Based Learning Do For Psychology?’ But ‘What Can Psychology Do For Problem-Based Learning?’ A Review of The Relevance of Problem-Based Learning For Psychology Teaching and Research, Psychology Learning & Teaching, 10.1177/1475725716643270, 15, 2, (136-154), (2016).
- Andrew Day, Christina Kozar and Linda Davey, Treatment approaches and offending behavior programs: Some critical issues, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10.1016/j.avb.2013.07.019, 18, 6, (630-635), (2013).
- Ashlee Curtis and Andrew Day, The impact of specialist training on professional identity, organisational membership, organisational commitment, and stress in correctional psychologists, The Journal of Forensic Practice, 10.1108/14636641311322313, 15, 2, (130-140), (2013).




