The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Nontraditional Students, Accelerated Programs, Grade Expectations, and Instructor Evaluations

Pamela Gershuny

Southeast Missouri State University

*Assistant Professor, Harrison College of Business, Southeast Missouri State University.Search for more papers by this author
Carolyn Rainey

Southeast Missouri State University

**Professor, Harrison College of Business, Southeast Missouri State University. This article benefited from the encouragement, insights, and criticisms of many colleagues. For comments on earlier drafts, our deepest appreciation goes to Nim Razook, Rafael Gely, Victor Garlin, Ruth Benander, and Bev Knauper. For their extraordinary commitment to quality, we thank our research assistants, Gwenda Bennett and Jennifer Cross. Finally, this article could not have been developed without the essential financial support of Southeast Missouri State University.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 August 2006
Cited by: 2

Abstract

This article is intended as both a cautionary tale and an encouraging guide for instructors who are beginning to teach in accelerated programs designed to attract nontraditional students. This article is based, in part, on classroom action research conducted through surveys, observations, exams, and assessments, in an introductory business law course taught in two different universities. Initially, this article seeks to define and examine the particular issues of the nontraditional student using demographic and anecdotal data gathered on nontraditional students at the University of Cincinnati and traditional students at Southeast Missouri State University. Special attention is given to the role of gender and role strain in nontraditional students. Role strain has three dimensions: (1) role conflict from simultaneous, incompatible demands; (2) role overload (insufficient time to meet all demands); and (3) role contagion or preoccupation with one role while performing another. The article also examines the relationship between grade expectations/grade inflation and instructor evaluations.

Number of times cited: 2

  • , UTILIZING ACTION RESEARCH TO IMPROVE COUNSELING EDUCATION COURSE WORK FOR CULTURALLY DIVERSE STUDENTS, i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 11, 2, (11), (2017).
  • , Student Ratings and Evaluation in Undergraduate Business Law Courses: A Modest Correlative Study, Journal of Legal Studies Education, 24, 2, (203), (2007).