The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

SELECTION BIAS: MULTIPLE MEANINGS

ROBERT L. LINN

Corresponding Author

University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign

ROBERT L. LINN, Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, 1310 S. Sixth St., Champaign, IL 61820. Degrees: BA, University of California, Los Angeles; MA, PhD, University of Illinois. Specializations: Psychometric theory, educational research methodology.
Search for more papers by this author
First published: March 1984
Cited by: 18

This paper is based on a presidential address to the Division of Evaluation and Measurement at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 1982.

Abstract

The common approach to studies of predictive bias is analyzed within the context of a conceptual model in which predictors and criterion measures are viewed as fallible indicators of idealized qualifications. Selection on the basis of idealized qualifications depends on acceptance of a meritocratic principle, a principle which is itself subject to debate. Even with acceptance of this principle, however, it is shown that there will generally be a wide range of uncertainty as the result of the fallible nature of the indicators. Only when boundary conditions defined by Birnbaum (1979) are exceeded will the results be unambiguous. An example of such a case is presented. It is argued, however, that such instances are probably somewhat rare.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 18

  • , Research on Validity Theory and Practice at ETS, Advancing Human Assessment, 10.1007/978-3-319-58689-2_16, (489-552), (2017).
  • , An Improved Correction for Range Restricted Correlations Under Extreme, Monotonic Quadratic Nonlinearity and Heteroscedasticity, Psychometrika, 81, 2, (550), (2016).
  • , Validity Issues in Assessing Linguistic Minorities, International Journal of Testing, 15, 2, (114), (2015).
  • , Statistical Power for a Simultaneous Test of Factorial and Predictive Invariance, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 1, (96), (2013).
  • , Using the Criterion-Predictor Factor Model to Compute the Probability of Detecting Prediction Bias with Ordinary Least Squares Regression, Psychometrika, 77, 3, (561), (2012).
  • , Too Good to Be True? Understanding Change in Organizational Outcomes, Journal of Management, 36, 6, (1555), (2010).
  • , Invariance in Measurement and Prediction Revisited, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-007-9039-7, 72, 4, (461-473), (2007).
  • , Evaluating the Predictive Validity of Graduate Management Admission Test Scores, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 2, (305), (2006).
  • , Examination of Gender Bias in University Admissions, Applied Measurement in Education, 10.1207/S15324818AME1501_05, 15, 1, (75-94), (2002).
  • , The New Faces of Fairness, Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 4, (369-382), (2006).
  • , Admission to Higher Education in Israel and the Role of the Psychometric Entrance Test: Educational and political dilemmas, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8, 3, (315), (2001).
  • , Gender Differences in College Mathematics Grades and SAT‐M Scores: A Reanalysis of Wainer and Steinberg, Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 3, (257-270), (2005).
  • , GENDER AND ETHNIC GROUP DIFFERENCES ON THE GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT, ETS Research Report Series, 1996, 1, (i), (1996).
  • , GENDER DIFFERENCES IN COLLEGE MATHEMATICS GRADES AND SAT‐M SCORES: A REANALYSIS OF WAINER AND STEINBERG, ETS Research Report Series, 1995, 1, (i-29), (2014).
  • , Inferential Conditions in the Statistical Detection of Measurement Bias, Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 4, (389), (1992).
  • , SEX DIFFERENCES IN SAT® PREDICTIONS OF COLLEGE GRADES, ETS Research Report Series, 1991, 2, (i-45), (2014).
  • , VALIDITY, ETS Research Report Series, 1987, 2, (i-208), (2014).
  • , USING DEMOGRAPHIC SUBGROUP AND DUMMY VARIABLE EQUATIONS TO PREDICT COLLEGE FRESHMAN GRADE AVERAGE, Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 2, (131-145), (2005).