Volume 39, Issue 2

Statistical Properties of the K‐Index for Detecting Answer Copying

First published: 15 June 2006
Citations: 32

Abstract

We investigated the statistical properties of the K‐index (Holland, 1996) that can be used to detect copying behavior on a test. A simulation study was conducted to investigate the applicability of the K‐index for small, medium, and large datasets. Furthermore, the Type I error rate and the detection rate of this index were compared with the copying index, ω (Wollack, 1997). Several approximations were used to calculate the K‐index. Results showed that all approximations were able to hold the Type I error rates below the nominal level. Results further showed that using ω resulted in higher detection rates than the K‐indices for small and medium sample sizes (100 and 500 simulees).

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 32

  • Caught in the Act: Predicting Cheating in Unproctored Knowledge Assessment, Assessment, 10.1177/1073191120914970, (107319112091497), (2020).
  • Detecting Examinees With Item Preknowledge in Large-Scale Testing Using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0013164419839439, (001316441983943), (2019).
  • Cheating and Incentives: Learning from a Policy Experiment, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10.1257/pol.20150066, 10, 1, (298-325), (2018).
  • An Algorithm to Improve Test Answer Copying Detection Using the Omega Statistic, International Journal of Testing, 10.1080/15305058.2016.1217418, 17, 1, (55-73), (2016).
  • Classification Performance of Answer-Copying Indices Under Different Types of IRT Models, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621616664724, 40, 8, (592-607), (2016).
  • Creating and Grading Latex Exams with Randomized Content Using RndTexExams, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2806570, (2016).
  • On the Optimality of Answer-Copying Indices, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 10.3102/1076998615595628, 40, 5, (435-453), (2016).
  • Computer Software Review: Cheating Detection at Your Fingertips, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621607300853, 31, 3, (233-239), (2016).
  • Detecting Answer Copying Using the Kappa Statistic, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621606288891, 30, 5, (412-431), (2016).
  • Detecting Answer Copying When the Regular Response Process Follows a Known Response Model, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 10.3102/10769986031003283, 31, 3, (283-304), (2016).
  • Cheating and Incentives: Learning from a Policy Experiment, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2606487, (2015).
  • L’utilisation du facteur de Bayes pour identifier les étudiants qui répondent au hasardThe use of the Bayes factor to identify students who guess at randomLa utilización del factor de Bayes para identificar a los estudiantes que responden al azar, Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 10.7202/1035310ar, 41, 3, (385), (2015).
  • Bayesian Checks on Cheating on Tests, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-014-9409-x, 80, 3, (689-706), (2014).
  • A Derivation of the Optimal Answer-Copying Index and Some Applications, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2414058, (2014).
  • A Derivation of the Optimal Answer-Copying Index and Some Applications, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2489178, (2014).
  • Detecting Plagiarism and Cheating, The Companion to Language Assessment, 10.1002/9781118411360, (980-993), (2013).
  • CopyDetect, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621612463119, 37, 1, (93-95), (2012).
  • The Empirical Power and Type I Error Rates of the GBT and ω Indices in Detecting Answer Copying on Multiple-Choice Tests, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0013164412442941, 72, 6, (975-1000), (2012).
  • Detection of Answer Copying Based on the Structure of a High-Stakes Test, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621611420705, 35, 7, (495-517), (2011).
  • Automatic Detection of Answer Copying via Kullback-Leibler Divergence and K-Index, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621610370453, 34, 6, (379-392), (2010).
  • Detecting Answer Copying in Standardized Tests (In Spanish), SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.1625509, (2010).
  • A Bivariate Lognormal Response-Time Model for the Detection of Collusion Between Test Takers, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 10.3102/1076998609332107, 34, 3, (378-394), (2009).
  • A Review of Integrity ™ , International Journal of Testing, 10.1080/15305050802001268, 8, 2, (202-207), (2008).
  • Detecting Answer Copying Using Alternate Test Forms and Seat Locations in Small‐Scale Examinations, Journal of Educational Measurement, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00055.x, 45, 2, (99-117), (2008).
  • Cheating on Tests, Psychology of Academic Cheating, 10.1016/B978-012372541-7/50015-2, (255-287), (2007).
  • Quality Control Procedures in the Scoring, Equating, and Reporting of Test Scores, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00087.x, 26, 1, (36-46), (2007).
  • Some mathematical models for deciding the number of examination questions on computerized adaptive tests, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.133, 180, 1, (178-184), (2006).
  • Simultaneous Use of Multiple Answer Copying Indexes to Improve Detection Rates, Applied Measurement in Education, 10.1207/s15324818ame1904_3, 19, 4, (265-288), (2006).
  • A Statistical Test for Detecting Answer Copying on Multiple‐Choice Tests, Journal of Educational Measurement, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2004.tb01171.x, 41, 4, (361-377), (2006).
  • Two New Statistics to Detect Answer Copying, Journal of Educational Measurement, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01096.x, 40, 1, (53-69), (2006).
  • Comparison of Answer Copying Indices with Real Data, Journal of Educational Measurement, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01104.x, 40, 3, (189-205), (2006).
  • Testing Hypotheses About the Person-Response Function in Person-Fit Analysis, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_1, 39, 1, (1-35), (2004).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.