Volume 46, Issue 2 p. 511-538

TWO WORLDS FAR APART: BLACK‐WHITE DIFFERENCES IN BELIEFS ABOUT WHY AFRICAN‐AMERICAN MEN ARE DISPROPORTIONATELY IMPRISONED*

JAMES D. UNNEVER

Department of Criminology, University of South Florida‐Sarasota

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 July 2008
Citations: 42
*

I thank Scott Mathers for reviewing an earlier draft of this manuscript. Direct correspondence to James D. Unnever, Department of Criminology, University of South Florida‐Sarasota, 8350 N. Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, FL 34243 (e‐mail: unnever@sar.usf.edu).

Abstract

Analyzing The Washington Post, Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, and Harvard University 2006 African American Survey, the current project focuses on three related issues. First, I examine whether African Americans and whites share a common “sensibility” or “cognitive landscape” when considering why African‐American men are disproportionately imprisoned. Second, the current research investigates whether the sensibilities held by African Americans and whites are collectively held. Third, I investigate whether the relative subordinate position of African Americans—as manifested in their personal experiences with racial discrimination—shapes the opinions that they have about why black men are disproportionately incarcerated. Findings reveal that African Americans and whites significantly differ in their opinions about why black men are imprisoned. They also show that deep divisions exist among whites, whereas African Americans tend to share a common sensibility as to why black males are disproportionately incarcerated. The results reveal that the cognitive landscape that African Americans collectively hold about why black men are incarcerated is shaped by their personal experiences with racial discrimination.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.