Representations of Fractions: Evidence for Accessing the Whole Magnitude in Adults
Abstract
Proficiency with fractions serves as a foundation for later mathematics and is critical for learning algebra, which plays a role in college success and lifetime earnings. Yet children often struggle to learn fractions. Educators have argued that a conceptual understanding of fractions involves learning that a fraction represents a magnitude different from its whole number components. However, it is not well understood whether adults represent a fraction's magnitude similarly to whole numbers. This study investigated the distance effect during a comparison task using fraction pairs that discouraged comparing a fraction's components. Accuracy improved and reaction times decreased with greater distance between fraction pairs, showing a distance effect similar to that seen with whole numbers. This study suggests that a representation of a fraction's magnitude is present in the fully developed number system.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited: 23
- Fuchang Liu, Mental representation of fractions: It all depends on whether they are common or uncommon, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (17470218.2017.1), (2018).
- Yingyi Liu, Fraction magnitude understanding and its unique role in predicting general mathematics achievement at two early stages of fraction instruction, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3, (345-362), (2017).
- Alison T. Miller Singley and Silvia A. Bunge, Eye gaze patterns reveal how we reason about fractions, Thinking & Reasoning, 10.1080/13546783.2017.1417909, 24, 4, (445-468), (2017).
- Stefan Huber, Julia F. Dietrich, Benjamin Nagengast and Korbinian Moeller, Using propensity score matching to construct experimental stimuli, Behavior Research Methods, 49, 3, (1107), (2017).
- Paulo Barraza, Rodrigo Avaria and Ivo Leiva, The role of attentional networks in the access to the numerical magnitude of fractions in adults / El rol de las redes atencionales en el acceso a la magnitud numérica de fracciones en adultos, Estudios de Psicología, 38, 2, (495), (2017).
- Emma H. Geller, Ji Y. Son and James W. Stigler, Conceptual explanations and understanding fraction comparisons, Learning and Instruction, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.006, 52, (122-129), (2017).
- Melissa DeWolf, Jeffrey N. Chiang, Miriam Bassok, Keith J. Holyoak and Martin M. Monti, Neural representations of magnitude for natural and rational numbers, NeuroImage, 141, (304), (2016).
- Anja Ischebeck, Marina Weilharter and Christof Körner, Eye movements reflect and shape strategies in fraction comparison, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 4, (713), (2016).
- Bradley J. Morris and Amy M. Masnick, Comparing Data Sets: Implicit Summaries of the Statistical Properties of Number Sets, Cognitive Science, 39, 1, (156-170), (2014).
- Thomas J. Faulkenberry, Sarah A. Montgomery and Sarah-Ann N. Tennes, Response trajectories reveal the temporal dynamics of fraction representations, Acta Psychologica, 159, (100), (2015).
- Percival G. Matthews and Dana L. Chesney, Fractions as percepts? Exploring cross-format distance effects for fractional magnitudes, Cognitive Psychology, 78, (28), (2015).
- David Maximiliano Gómez, Abelino Jiménez, Roberto Bobadilla, Cristián Reyes and Pablo Dartnell, The effect of inhibitory control on general mathematics achievement and fraction comparison in middle school children, ZDM, 47, 5, (801), (2015).
- Melissa DeWolf and Stella Vosniadou, The representation of fraction magnitudes and the whole number bias reconsidered, Learning and Instruction, 37, (39), (2015).
- Meirav Arieli‐Attali and Gabrielle Cayton‐Hodges, Expanding the ™ Mathematics Assessments to Elementary Grades: The Development of a Competency Model and a Rational Number Learning Progression, ETS Research Report Series, 2014, 1, (1-41), (2014).
- Li Zhang, Qiaochu Fang, Florence C. Gabriel and Dénes Szücs, The componential processing of fractions in adults and children: effects of stimuli variability and contextual interference, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, (2014).
- S. Huber, K. Moeller and H.-C. Nuerk, Adaptive processing of fractions — Evidence from eye-tracking, Acta Psychologica, 148, (37), (2014).
- Gaëlle Meert, Jacques Grégoire, Xavier Seron, Marie-Pascale Noël and Daniel Ansari, The Processing of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Ratios in School-Age Children, PLoS ONE, 8, 11, (e82002), (2013).
- Li Zhang, Qi Wang, Chongde Lin, Cody Ding, Xinlin Zhou and Pedro Antonio Valdes-Sosa, An ERP Study of the Processing of Common and Decimal Fractions: How Different They Are, PLoS ONE, 8, 7, (e69487), (2013).
- Chunhui Liu, Ziqiang Xin, Chongde Lin and Clarissa A. Thompson, Children’s mental representation when comparing fractions with common numerators, Educational Psychology, 33, 2, (175), (2013).
- Dana Ganor-Stern, Are 1/2 and 0.5 represented in the same way?, Acta Psychologica, 142, 3, (299), (2013).
- YunQi Wang and Robert S. Siegler, Representations of and translation between common fractions and decimal fractions, Chinese Science Bulletin, 58, 36, (4630), (2013).
- Dana Ganor-Stern, Fractions but not negative numbers are represented on the mental number line, Acta Psychologica, 139, 2, (350), (2012).
- Sara Fabbri, Sara Caviola, Joey Tang, Marco Zorzi and Brian Butterworth, The role of numerosity in processing nonsymbolic proportions, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 12, (2435), (2012).
