Messy Ethics: Conducting Moral Participatory Action Research in the Crucible of University–School Relations
Abstract
In this article we argue that when university researchers engage in democratic participatory action research with schools the process requires a special type of attention to the ethical difficulties which can arise. We note how current professional standards of ethics are inadequate to fully address many of the dilemmas faced in collaborative research. We then share examples of ethical dilemmas that have arisen in our work with schools and demonstrate how each has contributed to the (developing) framework we have created to avoid or manage the kinds of messy ethical issues we describe. We argue that this framework reflects a continuous commitment to an ethics of practice. We believe that those engaged in this type of work must assume an ethical stance and view all decisions in the research process as ethical ones that potentially affect the lives of all of those involved.
Number of times cited: 4
- Zoë Avner, William Bridel, Lindsay Eales, Nicole Glenn, Rachel Loewen Walker and Danielle Peers, Moved to messiness: Physical activity, feelings, and transdisciplinarity, Emotion, Space and Society, 12, (55), (2014).
- Meghan Zocchi and Courtney Pollack, Educational Neuroethics: A Contribution From Empirical Research, "Mind, Brain, and Education", 7, 1, (56-62), (2013).
- Rubén A. Gaztambide-Fernández and Adam Howard, Access, Status, and Representation: Some Reflections from Two Ethnographic Studies of Elite Schools, Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 43, 3, (289), (2012).
- Elena Wilson, Amanda Kenny and Virginia Dickson-Swift, Ethical Challenges in Community-Based Participatory Research, Qualitative Health Research, 10.1177/1049732317690721, (104973231769072), (2017).
