The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Public Understanding of Cognitive Neuroscience Research Findings: Trying to Peer Beyond Enchanted Glass

Tina A. Grotzer

Corresponding Author

Project Zero, Harvard University

Tina A. Grotzer, Project Zero, Harvard University Graduate School of Education, 124 Mt. Auburn Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138; e‐mail:

Tina_Grotzer@pz.harvard.edu

.
Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 August 2011
Cited by: 1

Abstract

This article considers the appeal of cognitive neuroscience research to the general public within the context of the deep puzzles involved in using our minds to understand how our minds work. It offers a few promising examples of findings that illuminate the ways of the mind and reveal these workings to be counter‐intuitive with our subjective experience. However, this promise is tempered by the powerful role that perception, attention, and cognition play in how we reason about evidence. It argues that the interplay between what we believe about the nature of our minds and what the findings suggest constitutes a primary challenge in encouraging public understanding of cognitive neuroscience findings.

Number of times cited: 1

  • , Neuroscience and Education: Issues and Challenges for Curriculum, Curriculum Inquiry, 42, 4, (534), (2012).