From Ancient Greece to Modern Education: Universality and Lack of Generalization of the Socratic Dialogue
Abstract
Two thousand four hundred years ago Socrates gave a remarkable lesson of geometry, perhaps the first detailed record of a pedagogical method in vivo in history [Plato. (2008). Apología de Sócrates. Menón. Crátilo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial]. Socrates asked Meno's slave 50 questions requiring simple additions or multiplications. At the end of the lesson the student discovered by himself how to duplicate a square using the diagonal of the given one as the side of the new square. We studied empirically the reproducibility of this dialogue in educated adults and adolescents of the 21st century. Our results show a remarkable agreement between Socratic and empiric dialogues. Even in questions in which Meno's slave made a mistake, within an unbounded number of possible erred responses, the vast majority of participants produced the same error as Meno's slave. Our results show that the Socratic dialogue is built on a strong intuition of human knowledge and reasoning which persists more than 24 centuries after its conception, providing one of the most striking demonstrations of universality across time and cultures. At the same time, they also emphasize its educational failure. After following every single question including Socrates' “diagonal argument,” almost 50% of the participants failed to learn the simplest generalization when asked to double the area of a square of different size.
Number of times cited: 9
- Cecilia I. Calero, Diego E. Shalom, Elizabeth S. Spelke and Mariano Sigman, Language, gesture, and judgment: Children’s paths to abstract geometry, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.07.015, 177, (70-85), (2019).
- Marzia Bizzaro, David Giofrè, Luisa Girelli and Cesare Cornoldi, Arithmetic, working memory, and visuospatial imagery abilities in children with poor geometric learning, Learning and Individual Differences, 62, (79), (2018).
- Andrea Paula Goldin, Olivia Pedroncini, Mariano Sigman and Andrew R. Dalby, Producing or reproducing reasoning? Socratic dialog is very effective, but only for a few, PLOS ONE, 12, 3, (e0173584), (2017).
- Marie Amalric, Liping Wang, Pierre Pica, Santiago Figueira, Mariano Sigman, Stanislas Dehaene and Randy Gallistel, The language of geometry: Fast comprehension of geometrical primitives and rules in human adults and preschoolers, PLOS Computational Biology, 13, 1, (e1005273), (2017).
- Moira R. Dillon and Elizabeth S. Spelke, Young Children's Use of Surface and Object Information in Drawings of Everyday Scenes, Child Development, 88, 5, (1701-1715), (2016).
- Sidney Strauss, Cecilia I. Calero and Mariano Sigman, Teaching, naturally, Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3, 2, (38), (2014).
- Lisa Holper, Andrea P. Goldin, Diego E. Shalóm, Antonio M. Battro, Martin Wolf and Mariano Sigman, The teaching and the learning brain: A cortical hemodynamic marker of teacher–student interactions in the Socratic dialog, International Journal of Educational Research, 59, (1), (2013).
- Antonio M. Battro, Cecilia I. Calero, Andrea P. Goldin, Lisa Holper, Laura Pezzatti, Diego E. Shalóm and Mariano Sigman, The Cognitive Neuroscience of the Teacher–Student Interaction, "Mind, Brain, and Education", 7, 3, (177-181), (2013).
- Antonio M. Battro and Kurt W. Fischer, Mind, Brain, and Education in the Digital Era, "Mind, Brain, and Education", 6, 1, (49-50), (2012).
