Predictors for Mathematics Achievement? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study
Abstract
Numerical processing has been extensively studied by examining the performance on basic number processing tasks, such as number priming, number comparison, and number line estimation. These tasks assess the innate “number sense,” which is assumed to be the breeding ground for later mathematics development. Indeed, several studies have associated children's performance in these tasks with individual differences in mathematical achievement. To date, however, most of these studies have cross‐sectional designs. Moreover, the few longitudinal studies either use complex tasks (e.g., story problems) or investigate only one of these basic number processing tasks at a time. In this study, we examine the association between the performance of children on several basic number processing tasks and their individual math achievement scores on a curriculum‐based test measured 1 year later. Regression analyses showed that most of the variance in children's math achievement was predicted by nonsymbolic number line estimation performance (i.e., estimating large quantities of dots) and, to a lesser extent, the speed of comparing symbolic numbers. This knowledge about the predictive value of the performance of 5‐ to 7‐year‐olds on these markers of number processing can help with the early identification of at‐risk children. In addition, this information can guide appropriate educational interventions.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited: 38
- Zachary Hawes, Nadia Nosworthy, Lisa Archibald and Daniel Ansari, Kindergarten children's symbolic number comparison skills predict 1st grade mathematics achievement: Evidence from a two-minute paper-and-pencil test, Learning and Instruction, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.09.004, 59, (21-33), (2019).
- Macarena Suárez‐Pellicioni and James R. Booth, Fluency in symbolic arithmetic refines the approximate number system in parietal cortex, Human Brain Mapping, 39, 10, (3956-3971), (2018).
- Michael Schneider, Kassandra Beeres, Leyla Coban, Simon Merz, S. Susan Schmidt, Johannes Stricker and Bert De Smedt, Associations of non‐symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: a meta‐analysis, Developmental Science, 20, 3, (2016).
- Iro Xenidou-Dervou, Dylan Molenaar, Daniel Ansari, Menno van der Schoot and Ernest C.D.M. van Lieshout, Nonsymbolic and symbolic magnitude comparison skills as longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement, Learning and Instruction, 50, (1), (2017).
- Helene Vos, Delphine Sasanguie, Wim Gevers and Bert Reynvoet, The role of general and number-specific order processing in adults’ arithmetic performance, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29, 4, (469), (2017).
- Francesco Sella, Ilaria Berteletti, Daniela Lucangeli and Marco Zorzi, Preschool children use space, rather than counting, to infer the numerical magnitude of digits: Evidence for a spatial mapping principle, Cognition, 158, (56), (2017).
- Melissa E. Libertus, Lea Forsman, Ulrika Adén and Kerstin Hellgren, Deficits in Approximate Number System Acuity and Mathematical Abilities in 6.5-Year-Old Children Born Extremely Preterm, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, (2017). the 5th International Conference TEEM 2017 Cádiz, Spain Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality - TEEM 2017 Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality ACM Press New York, New York, USA , (2017). 9781450353861 , 10.1145/3144826 20171128081358 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3144826 Carlos Mera, Gonzalo Ruiz-Cagigas, José I. Navarro-Guzmán, Estíbaliz Aragón-Mendizábal, Cándida Delgado and Manuel Aguilar-Villagrán APP designed for early math training. Magnitudes Comparison , (2017). 1 8 , 10.1145/3144826.3145415 20171128081400 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3144826.3145415
- Camilla Gilmore, Sarah Keeble, Sophie Richardson and Lucy Cragg, The interaction of procedural skill, conceptual understanding and working memory in early mathematics achievement, Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3, 2, (400), (2017).
- Clare S. Major, Jacob M. Paul and Robert A. Reeve, TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, (2017).
- Bethany Rittle‐Johnson, Emily R. Fyfe, Kerry G. Hofer and Dale C. Farran, Early Math Trajectories: Low‐Income Children's Mathematics Knowledge From Ages 4 to 11, Child Development, 88, 5, (1727-1742), (2016).
- Laura C. Gibson and Daphne Maurer, Development of SNARC and distance effects and their relation to mathematical and visuospatial abilities, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, (301), (2016).
- John Schacter and Booil Jo, Improving low-income preschoolers mathematics achievement with Math Shelf, a preschool tablet computer curriculum, Computers in Human Behavior, 55, (223), (2016).
- Julia Felicitas Dietrich, Stefan Huber, Elise Klein, Klaus Willmes, Silvia Pixner, Korbinian Moeller and Bert De Smedt, A Systematic Investigation of Accuracy and Response Time Based Measures Used to Index ANS Acuity, PLOS ONE, 11, 9, (e0163076), (2016).
- John Schacter, Jeff Shih, Charles M. Allen, Lina DeVaul, Amy B. Adkins, Taro Ito and Booil Jo, Math Shelf: A Randomized Trial of a Prekindergarten Tablet Number Sense Curriculum, Early Education and Development, 27, 1, (74), (2016).
- Catherine Thevenot, Guy Chazoule, Sandrine Masson, Caroline Castel and Michel Fayol, Les compétences numériques chez de jeunes enfants prématurés, L’Année psychologique, 116, 02, (227), (2016).
- Hamdollah Manzari Tavakoli, The relationship between accuracy of numerical magnitude comparisons and children’s arithmetic ability: A study in Iranian primary school children, Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12, 4, (567), (2016).
- Yiyun Zhang, Chuansheng Chen, Hang Liu, Jiaxin Cui and Xinlin Zhou, Both non-symbolic and symbolic quantity processing are important for arithmetical computation but not for mathematical reasoning, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10.1080/20445911.2016.1205074, 28, 7, (807-824), (2016).
- Lisa K. Fazio, Casey A. Kennedy, Robert S. Siegler and Bert De Smedt, Improving Children’s Knowledge of Fraction Magnitudes, PLOS ONE, 11, 10, (e0165243), (2016).
- Lennart Schalk, Henrik Saalbach, Roland H. Grabner and Elsbeth Stern, Relational quantitative reasoning in kindergarten predicts mathematical achievement in third grade, Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2, 2, (77), (2016).
- Mirjam Wasner, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Laura Martignon, Stephanie Roesch and Korbinian Moeller, Finger gnosis predicts a unique but small part of variance in initial arithmetic performance, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 146, (1), (2016).
- Mirjam Ebersbach, Koen Luwel and Lieven Verschaffel, The Relationship Between Children’s Familiarity with Numbers and Their Performance in Bounded and Unbounded Number Line Estimations, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17, 2-3, (136), (2015).
- Elena Soto-Calvo, Fiona R. Simmons, Catherine Willis and Anne-Marie Adams, Identifying the cognitive predictors of early counting and calculation skills: Evidence from a longitudinal study, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 140, (16), (2015).
- Birgit Knudsen, Martin H. Fischer, Anne Henning and Gisa Aschersleben, The Development of Arabic Digit Knowledge in 4- to 7-Year-Old Children, Journal of Numerical Cognition, 1, 1, (21), (2015).
- Stephan E. Vogel, Alicia Remark and Daniel Ansari, Differential processing of symbolic numerical magnitude and order in first-grade children, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 129, (26), (2015).
- Kiran Vanbinst, Eva Ceulemans, Pol Ghesquière and Bert De Smedt, Profiles of children’s arithmetic fact development: A model-based clustering approach, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 133, (29), (2015).
- Robert A. Reeve, Jacob M. Paul and Brian Butterworth, Longitudinal changes in young children’s 0–100 to 0–1000 number-line error signatures, Frontiers in Psychology, 6, (2015).
- Sarah Linsen, Lieven Verschaffel, Bert Reynvoet and Bert De Smedt, The association between numerical magnitude processing and mental versus algorithmic multi-digit subtraction in children, Learning and Instruction, 35, (42), (2015).
- Kiran Vanbinst, Pol Ghesquière and Bert De Smedt, Does numerical processing uniquely predict first graders’ future development of single-digit arithmetic?, Learning and Individual Differences, 37, (153), (2015).
- Camilla Gilmore, Nina Attridge, Bert De Smedt and Matthew Inglis, Measuring the approximate number system in children: Exploring the relationships among different tasks, Learning and Individual Differences, 29, (50), (2014).
- Dimona Bartelet, Anniek Vaessen, Leo Blomert and Daniel Ansari, What basic number processing measures in kindergarten explain unique variability in first-grade arithmetic proficiency?, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 117, (12), (2014).
- Delphine Sasanguie, Emmy Defever, Bieke Maertens and Bert Reynvoet, The Approximate Number System is not Predictive for Symbolic Number Processing in Kindergarteners, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2, (271), (2014).
- Matthew Inglis and Camilla Gilmore, Indexing the approximate number system, Acta Psychologica, 145, (147), (2014).
- Sarah Linsen, Lieven Verschaffel, Bert Reynvoet and Bert De Smedt, The association between children's numerical magnitude processing and mental multi-digit subtraction, Acta Psychologica, 145, (75), (2014).
- Bert De Smedt, Marie-Pascale Noël, Camilla Gilmore and Daniel Ansari, How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior, Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2, 2, (48), (2013).
- Delphine Sasanguie, Silke M. Göbel, Kristina Moll, Karolien Smets and Bert Reynvoet, Approximate number sense, symbolic number processing, or number–space mappings: What underlies mathematics achievement?, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 3, (418), (2013).
- Camilla Gilmore, Nina Attridge, Sarah Clayton, Lucy Cragg, Samantha Johnson, Neil Marlow, Victoria Simms, Matthew Inglis and Chris Chambers, Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement, PLoS ONE, 8, 6, (e67374), (2013).
- Venera Gashaj, Nicole Oberer, Fred W. Mast and Claudia M. Roebers, The Relation Between Executive Functions, Fine Motor Skills, and Basic Numerical Skills and Their Relevance for Later Mathematics Achievement, Early Education and Development, 10.1080/10409289.2018.1539556, (1-14), (2018).
