Numerical Magnitude Representations and Individual Differences in Children's Arithmetic Strategy Use
Abstract
Against the background of neuroimaging studies on how the brain processes numbers, there is now converging evidence that numerical magnitude representations are crucial for successful mathematics achievement. One major drawback of this research is that it mainly investigated mathematics performance as measured through general standardized achievement tests. We extended this research by investigating the association between numerical magnitude representations and children's strategy use during single‐digit arithmetic. Our findings reveal that children's symbolic but not nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing skills are associated with individual differences in arithmetic. Children with better access to magnitude representations from symbolic digits retrieve more facts from their memory and are faster in executing fact retrieval as well as procedural strategies. These associations remain even when intellectual ability, digit naming, and general mathematics achievement are additionally controlled for. All this indicates that particularly the access to numerical meaning from Arabic symbols is key for children's arithmetic strategy development, which suggests that educators and remedial teachers should focus on connecting Arabic symbols to the quantities they represent.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited: 51
- Yan hui Xiang, Hao Wu, Rui hong Shang, Xiaomei Chao, Ting ting Ren, Li ling Zheng and Lei Mo, Influence of the large–small split effect on strategy choice in complex subtraction, International Journal of Psychology, 53, 2, (92-96), (2016).
- Kiran Vanbinst, Eva Ceulemans, Lien Peters, Pol Ghesquière and Bert De Smedt, Developmental trajectories of children’s symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills and associated cognitive competencies, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, (232), (2018).
- Delphine Sasanguie and Helene Vos, About why there is a shift from cardinal to ordinal processing in the association with arithmetic between first and second grade, Developmental Science, 21, 5, (2018).
- Felicia W. Chu, Kristy vanMarle, Jeffrey Rouder and David C. Geary, Children’s early understanding of number predicts their later problem-solving sophistication in addition, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.010, 169, (73-92), (2018).
- Brecht Polspoel, Lien Peters, Maaike Vandermosten and Bert De Smedt, Strategy over operation: neural activation in subtraction and multiplication during fact retrieval and procedural strategy use in children, Human Brain Mapping, 38, 9, (4657-4670), (2017).
- Carmen Brankaer, Pol Ghesquière, Anke De Wel, Ann Swillen and Bert De Smedt, Numerical magnitude processing impairments in genetic syndromes: a cross‐syndrome comparison of Turner and 22q11.2 deletion syndromes, Developmental Science, 20, 6, (2016).
- Carrie Georges, Danielle Hoffmann and Christine Schiltz, Mathematical abilities in elementary school: Do they relate to number–space associations?, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, (126), (2017).
- Jens Holger Lorenz, Einige Anmerkungen zur Repräsentation von Wissen über Zahlen, Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 38, 1, (125), (2017).
- Jiaxin Cui, Yiyun Zhang, Dazhi Cheng, Dawei Li and Xinlin Zhou, Visual Form Perception Can Be a Cognitive Correlate of Lower Level Math Categories for Teenagers, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, (2017).
- Julia Felicitas Dietrich, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Elise Klein, Korbinian Moeller and Stefan Huber, Set size influences the relationship between ANS acuity and math performance: a result of different strategies?, Psychological Research, (2017).
- Carmen Brankaer, Pol Ghesquière and Bert De Smedt, Symbolic magnitude processing in elementary school children: A group administered paper-and-pencil measure (SYMP Test), Behavior Research Methods, 49, 4, (1361), (2017).
- Lien Peters and Bert De Smedt, Arithmetic in the developing brain: A review of brain imaging studies, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.05.002, (2017).
- Daniel L. Dinsmore, Toward a Dynamic, Multidimensional Research Framework for Strategic Processing, Educational Psychology Review, 29, 2, (235), (2017).
- Peng Peng, Xiujie Yang and Xiangzhi Meng, The relation between approximate number system and early arithmetic: The mediation role of numerical knowledge, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 157, (111), (2017).
- Delphine Sasanguie, Ian M. Lyons, Bert De Smedt and Bert Reynvoet, Unpacking symbolic number comparison and its relation with arithmetic in adults, Cognition, 165, (26), (2017).
- Anna A. Matejko and Daniel Ansari, How do individual differences in children's domain specific and domain general abilities relate to brain activity within the intraparietal sulcus during arithmetic? An fMRI study, Human Brain Mapping, 38, 8, (3941-3956), (2017).
- Michael Schneider, Kassandra Beeres, Leyla Coban, Simon Merz, S. Susan Schmidt, Johannes Stricker and Bert De Smedt, Associations of non‐symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: a meta‐analysis, Developmental Science, 20, 3, (2016).
- Elien Bellon, Wim Fias and Bert De Smedt, Are Individual Differences in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval in Children Related to Inhibition?, Frontiers in Psychology, 7, (2016).
- Kiran Vanbinst, Daniel Ansari, Pol Ghesquière, Bert De Smedt and Simon J Cropper, Symbolic Numerical Magnitude Processing Is as Important to Arithmetic as Phonological Awareness Is to Reading, PLOS ONE, 11, 3, (e0151045), (2016).
- Cindy S. Chew, Jason D. Forte and Robert A. Reeve, Cognitive factors affecting children’s nonsymbolic and symbolic magnitude judgment abilities: A latent profile analysis, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, (173), (2016).
- Nastasya Honoré, Marie-Pascale Noël and Tom Verguts, Improving Preschoolers’ Arithmetic through Number Magnitude Training: The Impact of Non-Symbolic and Symbolic Training, PLOS ONE, 11, 11, (e0166685), (2016).
- Yiyun Zhang, Chuansheng Chen, Hang Liu, Jiaxin Cui and Xinlin Zhou, Both non-symbolic and symbolic quantity processing are important for arithmetical computation but not for mathematical reasoning, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10.1080/20445911.2016.1205074, 28, 7, (807-824), (2016).
- Anna A. Matejko, Daniel Ansari and Christian Agrillo, Trajectories of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude Processing in the First Year of Formal Schooling, PLOS ONE, 11, 3, (e0149863), (2016).
- Julia Felicitas Dietrich, Stefan Huber, Elise Klein, Klaus Willmes, Silvia Pixner, Korbinian Moeller and Bert De Smedt, A Systematic Investigation of Accuracy and Response Time Based Measures Used to Index ANS Acuity, PLOS ONE, 11, 9, (e0163076), (2016).
- Alexis Hiniker, Miriam Rosenberg-Lee and Vinod Menon, Distinctive Role of Symbolic Number Sense in Mediating the Mathematical Abilities of Children with Autism, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 4, (1268), (2016).
- Li Wang, Yuhua Sun and Xinlin Zhou, Relation between Approximate Number System Acuity and Mathematical Achievement: The Influence of Fluency, Frontiers in Psychology, 7, (2016).
- K. Vanbinst and B. De Smedt, Individual differences in children's mathematics achievement, The Mathematical Brain Across the Lifespan, 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.001, (105-130), (2016).
- Bert De Smedt, Individual Differences in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval, Development of Mathematical Cognition, 10.1016/B978-0-12-801871-2.00009-5, (219-243), (2016).
- Hamdollah Manzari Tavakoli, The relationship between accuracy of numerical magnitude comparisons and children’s arithmetic ability: A study in Iranian primary school children, Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12, 4, (567), (2016).
- Tamara M. J. Schleepen, Hanneke I. Van Mier, Bert De Smedt and Tom Verguts, The Contribution of Numerical Magnitude Comparison and Phonological Processing to Individual Differences in Fourth Graders’ Multiplication Fact Ability, PLOS ONE, 11, 6, (e0158335), (2016).
- Sarah Linsen, Joke Torbeyns, Lieven Verschaffel, Bert Reynvoet and Bert De Smedt, The association between symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing and mental versus algorithmic subtraction in adults, Acta Psychologica, 165, (34), (2016).
- Laura C. Gibson and Daphne Maurer, Development of SNARC and distance effects and their relation to mathematical and visuospatial abilities, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, (301), (2016).
- Violeta Pina, Alejandro Castillo, Roi Cohen Kadosh and Luis J. Fuentes, Intentional and automatic numerical processing as predictors of mathematical abilities in primary school children, Frontiers in Psychology, 6, (2015).
- Kiran Vanbinst, Eva Ceulemans, Pol Ghesquière and Bert De Smedt, Profiles of children’s arithmetic fact development: A model-based clustering approach, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 133, (29), (2015).
- Xinlin Zhou, Wei Wei, Yiyun Zhang, Jiaxin Cui and Chuansheng Chen, Visual perception can account for the close relation between numerosity processing and computational fluency, Frontiers in Psychology, 6, (2015).
- Sarah Linsen, Lieven Verschaffel, Bert Reynvoet and Bert De Smedt, The association between numerical magnitude processing and mental versus algorithmic multi-digit subtraction in children, Learning and Instruction, 35, (42), (2015).
- Kiran Vanbinst, Pol Ghesquière and Bert De Smedt, Does numerical processing uniquely predict first graders’ future development of single-digit arithmetic?, Learning and Individual Differences, 37, (153), (2015).
- Delphine Sasanguie, Bert Reynvoet and Daniel Ansari, Adults' Arithmetic Builds on Fast and Automatic Processing of Arabic Digits: Evidence from an Audiovisual Matching Paradigm, PLoS ONE, 9, 2, (e87739), (2014).
- Lisa K. Fazio, Drew H. Bailey, Clarissa A. Thompson and Robert S. Siegler, Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 123, (53), (2014).
- Matthew Inglis and Camilla Gilmore, Indexing the approximate number system, Acta Psychologica, 145, (147), (2014).
- Delphine Sasanguie, Emmy Defever, Bieke Maertens and Bert Reynvoet, The Approximate Number System is not Predictive for Symbolic Number Processing in Kindergarteners, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2, (271), (2014).
- Kiran Vanbinst, Pol Ghesquière and Bert De Smedt, Arithmetic strategy development and its domain-specific and domain-general cognitive correlates: A longitudinal study in children with persistent mathematical learning difficulties, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 11, (3001), (2014).
- Camilla Gilmore, Nina Attridge, Bert De Smedt and Matthew Inglis, Measuring the approximate number system in children: Exploring the relationships among different tasks, Learning and Individual Differences, 29, (50), (2014).
- Carmen Brankaer, Pol Ghesquière and Bert De Smedt, Numerical magnitude processing deficits in children with mathematical difficulties are independent of intelligence, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 11, (2603), (2014).
- Sarah Linsen, Lieven Verschaffel, Bert Reynvoet and Bert De Smedt, The association between children's numerical magnitude processing and mental multi-digit subtraction, Acta Psychologica, 145, (75), (2014).
- Greet Peters, Bert De Smedt, Joke Torbeyns, Lieven Verschaffel and Pol Ghesquière, Subtraction by addition in children with mathematical learning disabilities, Learning and Instruction, 30, (1), (2014).
- Sarah A. Gray, Robert A. Reeve and Daniel Ansari, Preschoolers' Dot Enumeration Abilities Are Markers of Their Arithmetic Competence, PLoS ONE, 9, 4, (e94428), (2014).
- Bert De Smedt, Marie-Pascale Noël, Camilla Gilmore and Daniel Ansari, How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior, Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2, 2, (48), (2013).
- Camilla Gilmore, Nina Attridge, Sarah Clayton, Lucy Cragg, Samantha Johnson, Neil Marlow, Victoria Simms, Matthew Inglis and Chris Chambers, Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement, PLoS ONE, 8, 6, (e67374), (2013).
- Jenny Busch, Claudia Schmidt, Sara Studte and Dietmar Grube, Kognitive Merkmale rechenschwacher Kinder in Abhängigkeit vom Cut-off Kriterium, Lernen und Lernstörungen, 10.1024/2235-0977/a000258, (1-12), (2018).
- Joanna Schiffman and Elida V. Laski, Materials count: Linear-spatial materials improve young children’s addition strategies and accuracy, irregular arrays don’t, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0208832, 13, 12, (e0208832), (2018).
