Volume 5, Issue 2

Improving occurrence‐based rarity metrics in conservation studies by including multiple rarity cut‐off points

BORIS LEROY

Equipe Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, UMR 7204 MNHN et Service du Patrimoine Naturel, Université de Rennes I, Rennes Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
JULIEN PETILLON

Equipe Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, UMR 7204 MNHN et Service du Patrimoine Naturel, Université de Rennes I, Rennes Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
REGIS GALLON

Equipe Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, UMR 7204 MNHN et Service du Patrimoine Naturel, Université de Rennes I, Rennes Cedex, France

CRESCO, MNHN, UMR 5178 BOREA, Dinard, France

Search for more papers by this author
ALAIN CANARD

Equipe Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, UMR 7204 MNHN et Service du Patrimoine Naturel, Université de Rennes I, Rennes Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
FREDERIC YSNEL

Equipe Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, UMR 7204 MNHN et Service du Patrimoine Naturel, Université de Rennes I, Rennes Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 April 2011
Citations: 21
Boris Leroy, Equipe Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, UMR 7204 MNHN et Service du Patrimoine Naturel, Université de Rennes I, 263 Av.du Gal, Leclerc 35042 Rennes Cedex, France. E‐mail: leroy.boris@gmail.com

Abstract

Abstract. 1. This study aims to develop a new method for assigning rarity weights to species in evaluations of the relative rarity of arthropod assemblages in conservation/monitoring studies.

2. A flexible characteristic was included in the rarity weighting method by introducing the possibility of fitting the method to a rarity cut‐off point defined as the threshold of occurrence below which species are considered as being rare. This allows calculation of a rarity metric (index of relative rarity IRR) with multiple rarity cut‐off points.

3. The proposed weighting method was used and compared with three previously proposed methods in a theoretical analysis. IRR values were then calculated for spider assemblages of a National Nature Reserve in France. Two methods of rankings were proposed: a local ranking between sites of the Nature Reserve, and a regional ranking in comparison to a reference database.

4. The proposed weighting method consistently weighted species according to the chosen rarity cut‐offs. Species weights were less biased toward common species and rare species weights were less dispersed than with previous methods. Assemblages were consistently ranked according to the rarity of spiders in each assemblage. The index showed different patterns of rarity in assemblages which could not be detected by previous rarity metrics.

5. This method provides an improved understanding of assemblage rarity patterns relative to previous methods and can be consistently applied to other arthropod taxa in other geographic area and/or spatial scales.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 21

  • Contribution of artificial waterbodies to biodiversity: A glass half empty or half full?, Science of The Total Environment, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141987, 753, (141987), (2021).
  • Inclusion of myxomycetes in the Red Data Book of Ukraine: feasibility, selection criteria and recommended species, Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 10.15407/ukrbotj77.03.189, 77, 3, (189-203), (2020).
  • The role of rarity as a surrogate of marine fish species representation, PeerJ, 10.7717/peerj.8373, 8, (e8373), (2020).
  • Green infrastructures and ecological corridors shape avian biodiversity in a small French city, Urban Ecosystems, 10.1007/s11252-020-01062-7, (2020).
  • Analysis of Transcriptionally Active Bacteria Throughout the Gastrointestinal Tract of Healthy Individuals, Gastroenterology, 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.068, (2019).
  • Evaluating the performance of rarity as a surrogate in site prioritization for biodiversity conservation, Global Ecology and Conservation, 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00639, (e00639), (2019).
  • High-diversity microbiomes in the guts of bryophagous beetles (Coleoptera: Byrrhidae), European Journal of Entomology, 10.14411/eje.2019.044, 116, (432-441), (2019).
  • Spontaneous recovery of functional diversity and rarity of ground-living spiders shed light on the conservation importance of recent woodlands, Biodiversity and Conservation, 10.1007/s10531-018-01687-3, (2019).
  • Functional diversity along elevational gradients in the high altitude vegetation of the western Himalaya, Biodiversity and Conservation, 10.1007/s10531-019-01728-5, (2019).
  • Towards an understanding of the drivers of broad-scale patterns of rarity-weighted richness for vertebrates, Biodiversity and Conservation, 10.1007/s10531-019-01847-z, (2019).
  • Islands in the trees: A biogeographic exploration of epiphyte‐dwelling spiders, Journal of Biogeography, 10.1111/jbi.13422, 45, 10, (2262-2271), (2018).
  • Community-wide scan identifies fish species associated with coral reef services across the Indo-Pacific, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 10.1098/rspb.2018.1167, 285, 1883, (20181167), (2018).
  • Plants in traditional home gardens: richness, composition, conservation and implications for native biodiversity in Benin, Biodiversity and Conservation, 10.1007/s10531-017-1407-8, 26, 14, (3307-3327), (2017).
  • DER: An algorithm for comparing species diversity between assemblages, Ecological Indicators, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.049, 81, (41-46), (2017).
  • Functional Rarity: The Ecology of Outliers, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10.1016/j.tree.2017.02.002, 32, 5, (356-367), (2017).
  • Cross-taxon congruence in the rarity of subtidal rocky marine assemblages: No taxonomic shortcut for conservation monitoring, Ecological Indicators, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.012, 77, (239-249), (2017).
  • Designating conservation priorities for Southeast European hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on species distribution models and species vulnerability, Insect Conservation and Diversity, 10.1111/icad.12232, 10, 4, (354-366), (2017).
  • Conservation of reef corals in the South China Sea based on species and evolutionary diversity, Biodiversity and Conservation, 10.1007/s10531-016-1052-7, 25, 2, (331-344), (2016).
  • Complementarity of rarity, specialisation and functional diversity metrics to assess community responses to environmental changes, using an example of spider communities in salt marshes, Ecological Indicators, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.037, 46, (351-357), (2014).
  • Répartition de la biodiversité en France métropolitaine : une synthèse des Atlas faunistiques, VertigO, 10.4000/vertigo.14645, Volume 14 Numéro 1, (2014).
  • Integrating multiple scales in rarity assessments of invertebrate taxa, Diversity and Distributions, 10.1111/ddi.12040, 19, 7, (794-803), (2013).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.