Who are the top contributors in a MOOC? Relating participants' performance and contributions
Abstract
The role of social tools in massive open online courses (MOOCs) is essential as they connect participants. Of all the participants in an MOOC, top contributors are the ones who more actively contribute via social tools. This article analyses and reports empirical data from five different social tools pertaining to an actual MOOC to characterize top contributors and provide some insights aimed at facilitating their early detection. The results of this analysis show that top contributors have better final scores than the rest. In addition, there is a moderate positive correlation between participants' overall performance (measured in terms of final scores) and the number of posts submitted to the five social tools. This article also studies the effect of participants' gender and scores as factors that can be used for the early detection of top contributors. The analysis shows that gender is not a good predictor and that taking the scores of the first assessment activities of each type (test and peer assessment in the case study) results in a prediction that is not substantially improved by adding subsequent activities. Finally, better predictions based on scores are obtained for aggregate contributions in the five social tools than for individual contributions in each social tool.
Number of times cited: 9
- Jenna Mittelmeier, Bart Rienties, Dirk Tempelaar, Garron Hillaire and Denise Whitelock, The influence of internationalised versus local content on online intercultural collaboration in groups: A randomised control trial study in a statistics course, Computers & Education, 118, (82), (2018).
- Pedro Manuel Moreno-Marcos, Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino, Carlos Alario-Hoyos, Iria Estévez-Ayres and Carlos Delgado Kloos, Analysing the predictive power for anticipating assignment grades in a massive open online course, Behaviour & Information Technology, 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1458904, 37, 10-11, (1021-1036), (2018).
- Ritanjali Panigrahi and Praveen Ranjan Srivastava, Tweeting Continuing Education, International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences, 10.4018/IJSDS.2018010106, 9, 1, (79-101), (2018).
- B. Swinnerton, S. Hotchkiss and N.P. Morris, Comments in MOOCs: who is doing the talking and does it help?, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 1, (51-64), (2017).
- Mohammad Khalil and Martin Ebner, Clustering patterns of engagement in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): the use of learning analytics to reveal student categories, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 1, (114), (2017).
- Andrew A. Tawfik, Todd D. Reeves, Amy E. Stich, Anila Gill, Chenda Hong, Joseph McDade, Venkata Sai Pillutla, Xiaoshu Zhou and Philippe J. Giabbanelli, The nature and level of learner–learner interaction in a chemistry massive open online course (MOOC), Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 3, (411), (2017). 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) Washington DC,USA 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) IEEE , (2016). 978-1-4673-9005-7 Ismail Duru, Gulustan Dogan and Banu Diri An overview of studies about students' performance analysis and learning analytics in MOOCs , (2016). 1719 1723 7840786 , 10.1109/BigData.2016.7840786 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7840786/
- Mohammad Khalil and Martin Ebner, When Learning Analytics Meets MOOCs - a Review on iMooX Case Studies, Innovations for Community Services, 10.1007/978-3-319-49466-1_1, (3-19), (2016). 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) Salamanca, Spain 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) IEEE , (2016). 978-1-5090-4596-9 Carlos Delgado Kloos, Carlos Alario-Hoyos, Carmen Fernandez-Panadero, Iria Estevez-Ayres, Pedro J. Munoz-Merino, Ruth Cobos, Jaime Moreno, Edmundo Tovar, Rosa Cabedo, Nelson Piedra, Janneth Chicaiza and Jorge Lopez eMadrid project: MOOCs and learning analytics , (2016). 1 5 7751870 , 10.1109/SIIE.2016.7751870 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7751870/
