The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original article

Short answers to deep questions: supporting teachers in large‐class settings

J. McDonald

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: j.mcdonald@auckland.ac.nz

Centre for Learning and Research in Higher Education, University of Auckland, , New Zealand

Correspondence: Jenny McDonald, Centre for Learning and Research in Higher Education, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand. Email:

j.mcdonald@auckland.ac.nz

Search for more papers by this author
R.J. Bird

Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, , New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
A. Zouaq

School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, , Canada

Search for more papers by this author
A.C.M. Moskal

College of Enterprise and Development, Otago Polytechnic, , New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 February 2017

Abstract

In large class settings, individualized student–teacher interaction is difficult. However, teaching interactions (e.g., formative feedback) are central to encouraging deep approaches to learning. While there has been progress in automatic short‐answer grading, analysing student responses to support formative feedback at scale is arguably some way from being widely applied in practice. However, analysing student written responses can provide insights into student conceptions, thus directly informing teacher actions. Indeed, we argue that analysing student responses to provide feedback directly to teachers is as worthy a goal as providing individualized feedback to students and is achievable given the current state‐of‐the‐art in natural language processing. In this paper, we analyse student written responses to short‐answer questions posed in the context of a large first year health sciences course. Each question was designed to elicit deep responses. Our qualitative analysis illustrates the variability in student responses and reveals multiple relationships between these responses, course materials and the questions posed. Such information can be invaluable for teacher praxis. We conclude with a conceptual ‘dashboard’ that categorizes student responses and reveals relationships between responses, course resources and the questions. Such a dashboard could provide timely, actionable insights for teachers and help foster deep learning approaches for students.

Lay Description

What is already known about this topic:

  • Teaching interactions, such as formative feedback on student writing, are central to encouraging deep approaches to learning and academic success.
  • It is not practical for teachers to provide individualized formative feedback in large‐class settings, and accuracy and reliability issues mean automated methods are a long way from being widely applied in practice.

What this paper adds:

  • Demonstrates that the analysis of student written responses in relation to course materials can provide insights into student conceptions and thus directly inform teacher actions.
  • Argues that such an analysis is feasible with existing technologies, and
  • that this approach can provide timely and actionable insights for teachers, and foster deep learning approaches for students.

Implications for practice and/or policy:

  • Efforts should be made to incorporate basic corpus analysis and text mining tools and techniques into teaching tools, such as Learning Management System in order to provide teachers with insights into evolving student conceptions. A mock‐up teacher dashboard is presented as an example.