Personality Predicts Obedience in a Milgram Paradigm
Abstract
This study investigates how obedience in a Milgram‐like experiment is predicted by interindividual differences. Participants were 35 males and 31 females aged 26–54 from the general population who were contacted by phone 8 months after their participation in a study transposing Milgram's obedience paradigm to the context of a fake television game show. Interviews were presented as opinion polls with no stated ties to the earlier experiment. Personality was assessed by the Big Five Mini‐Markers questionnaire (Saucier, 1994). Political orientation and social activism were also measured. Results confirmed hypotheses that Conscientiousness and Agreeableness would be associated with willingness to administer higher‐intensity electric shocks to a victim. Political orientation and social activism were also related to obedience. Our results provide empirical evidence suggesting that individual differences in personality and political variables matter in the explanation of obedience to authority.
Number of times cited: 12
- Iwona Janczarek and Izabela Wilk, Leisure riding horses: research topics versus the needs of stakeholders, Animal Science Journal, 88, 7, (953-958), (2017).
- Csilla Deak and Vassilis Saroglou, Terminating a Child’s Life? Religious, Moral, Cognitive, and Emotional Factors Underlying Non-Acceptance of Child Euthanasia, Psychologica Belgica, 57, 1, (59), (2017).
- Shuki J. Cohen, Cognitive Rigidity, Overgeneralization and Fanaticism, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_834-1, (1-7), (2017).
- Thomas F. Denson, Benjamin M. Wilkowski, C. Nathan DeWall, Malte Friese, Wilhelm Hofmann, Elizabeth L. Ferguson, Miriam M. Capper and Michael M. Kasumovic, “Thou Shalt Kill”: Practicing self-control supports adherence to personal values when asked to aggress, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, (71), (2017).
- Jean Decety, Robert Pape and Clifford I. Workman, A multilevel social neuroscience perspective on radicalization and terrorism, Social Neuroscience, (1), (2017).
- Justin D Russell, Carl F Weems, Irfan Ahmed and Golden G. Richard, Self-reported secure and insecure cyber behaviour: factor structure and associations with personality factors, Journal of Cyber Security Technology, (1), (2017).
- Maxim Karl, Väterchen Frost von Alexander Afanasjew (Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts), Psychologie der Märchen, 10.1007/978-3-662-53668-1_22, (163-169), (2017).
- PANOS PARIS, Scepticism about Virtue and the Five-Factor Model of Personality, Utilitas, 29, 04, (423), (2017).
- Paul Gilbert, Francisca Catarino, Joana Sousa, Laura Ceresatto, Rosalind Moore and Jaskaran Basran, Measuring competitive self-focus perspective taking, submissive compassion and compassion goals, Journal of Compassionate Health Care, 10.1186/s40639-017-0034-2, 4, 1, (2017).
- Penny Spikins, Barry Wright and Derek Hodgson, Are there alternative adaptive strategies to human pro-sociality? The role of collaborative morality in the emergence of personality variation and autistic traits, Time and Mind, 9, 4, (289), (2016).
- Robert Schnuerch and Stefan Pfattheicher, Motivated malleability: Frontal cortical asymmetry predicts the susceptibility to social influence, Social Neuroscience, 10.1080/17470919.2017.1355333, (1-15), (2017).
- Jennifer S. Mascaro, Alana Darcher, Lobsang T. Negi and Charles L. Raison, The neural mediators of kindness-based meditation: a theoretical model, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00109, 6, (2015).
