The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Growth and predictors of change in English language learners' reading comprehension

Fataneh Farnia

Corresponding Author

Hincks‐Dellcrest Centre/Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, , Canada

Department of Human Development and Applied Psychology, University of Toronto, , Canada

Address for correspondence: Fataneh Farnia, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 114 Maitland Street, Toronto ON M4Y 1E1, Canada. Email:

fataneh.farnia@utoronto.ca

Search for more papers by this author
Esther Geva

Hincks‐Dellcrest Centre/Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, , Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 May 2013
Cited by: 9

Abstract

This study modelled reading comprehension trajectories in Grades 4 to 6 English language learners (ELLs = 400), with different home language backgrounds, and in English monolinguals (EL1s = 153), and examined an augmented Simple View of Reading model. The contribution of Grade 1 (early) and Grade 4 (late) cognitive, language and word‐level reading to Grade 6 reading comprehension was examined. The reading comprehension trajectory was non‐linear in ELLs but linear in EL1s. Syntax predicted consistently rate of growth in reading comprehension. ELLs consistently underperformed EL1s on reading comprehension. Word‐level reading and all components of language (vocabulary, syntax and listening comprehension) remained stable predictors of Grade 6 reading comprehension. Grade 1 phonological awareness, naming speed and working memory predicted reading comprehension in Grade 6, as did Grade 4 phonological short‐term memory. Results support an augmented Simple View of Reading that includes cognitive, word‐level and language components, and underscore the importance of considering developmental changes in the constructs.

Number of times cited: 9

  • , Lexical quality and executive control predict children’s first and second language reading comprehension, Reading and Writing, 31, 2, (405), (2018).
  • , Academic Language as a Predictor of Reading Comprehension in Monolingual Spanish‐Speaking Readers: Evidence From Chilean Early Adolescents, Reading Research Quarterly, 53, 2, (223-247), (2017).
  • , Supporting Language and Literacy Development for Additional Language Learners with Disabilities, The Wiley Handbook of Diversity in Special Education, (183-205), (2017).
  • , System approach to pedagogical discourse: CLD learners, Psychology in the Schools, 54, 10, (1267-1278), (2017).
  • , What Do Phonological Processing Errors Tell About Students’ Skills in Reading, Writing, and Oral Language?, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35, 1-2, (24), (2017).
  • , Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 2, (201), (2016).
  • , Language Deficits in Poor L2 Comprehenders: The Simple View, Foreign Language Annals, 48, 4, (635-658), (2015).
  • , Beyond Vocabulary: Exploring Cross‐Disciplinary Academic‐Language Proficiency and Its Association With Reading Comprehension, Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 3, (337-356), (2015).
  • , How Initial Word Reading and Language Skills Affect Reading Comprehension Outcomes for Students With Reading Difficulties, Exceptional Children, 10.1177/0014402918782618, (001440291878261), (2018).