Volume 35, Issue 1
Original Article

A FIXED‐ b TEST FOR A BREAK IN LEVEL AT AN UNKNOWN TIME UNDER FRACTIONAL INTEGRATION

Fabrizio Iacone

Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen J. Leybourne

School of Economics and Granger Centre for Time Series Econometrics, University of Nottingham

Search for more papers by this author
A. M. Robert Taylor

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: rtaylor@essex.ac.uk

Essex Business School, University of Essex

Correspondence to: A. M. Robert Taylor, Essex Business School, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK.

E‐mail: rtaylor@essex.ac.uk

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 October 2013
Citations: 10
Correction added on 06 December 2016, after publication: The issue publication year in the online pdf has been corrected from 2013 to 2014.

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a test for a break in the level of a fractionally integrated process when the timing of the putative break is not known. This testing problem has received considerable attention in the literature in the case where the time series is weakly autocorrelated. Less attention has been given to the case where the underlying time series is allowed to be fractionally integrated. Here, valid testing can only be performed if the limiting null distribution of the level break test statistic is well defined for all values of the fractional integration exponent considered. However, conventional sup‐Wald type tests diverge when the data are strongly autocorrelated. We show that a sup‐Wald statistic, which is standardized using a non‐parametric kernel‐based long‐run variance estimator, does possess a well‐defined limit distribution, depending only on the fractional integration parameter, provided the recently developed fixed‐b asymptotic framework is applied. We give the appropriate asymptotic critical values for this sup‐Wald statistic and show that it has good finite sample size and power properties.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 10

  • Distinguishing between breaks in the mean and breaks in persistence under long memory, Economics Letters, 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109338, 193, (109338), (2020).
  • True versus Spurious Long Memory in Cryptocurrencies, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 10.3390/jrfm13090186, 13, 9, (186), (2020).
  • Fixed-Bandwidth CUSUM Tests Under Long Memory, Econometrics and Statistics, 10.1016/j.ecosta.2019.08.001, (2019).
  • Semiparametric Detection of Changes in Long Range Dependence, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 10.1111/jtsa.12448, 40, 5, (693-706), (2019).
  • memochange: An R package for estimation procedures and tests for persistent time series, Journal of Open Source Software, 10.21105/joss.01820, 4, 43, (1820), (2019).
  • Estimating multiple breaks in mean sequentially with fractionally integrated errors, Statistical Papers, 10.1007/s00362-019-01104-z, (2019).
  • Change-in-mean tests in long-memory time series: a review of recent developments, AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 10.1007/s10182-018-0328-5, 103, 2, (237-256), (2018).
  • A simple test on structural change in long-memory time series, Economics Letters, 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.12.007, 163, (90-94), (2018).
  • Inference on a Structural Break in Trend with Fractionally Integrated Errors, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 10.1111/jtsa.12176, 37, 4, (555-574), (2016).
  • Forecasting long memory series subject to structural change: A two-stage approach, International Journal of Forecasting, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.01.006, 31, 4, (1056-1066), (2015).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.