The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW ARTICLE

Modeling Systematicity and Individuality in Nonlinear Second Language Development: The Case of English Grammatical Morphemes

Akira Murakami

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: am933@cam.ac.uk

University of Cambridge

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Akira Murakami, Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 9 West Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB3 9DP. E‐mail:

am933@cam.ac.uk

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 February 2016
Cited by: 7

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dora Alexopoulou, who as my supervisor provided me with continuing and valuable guidance, extensive feedback, and constructive advice on my Ph.D. project that this article is based on. I would also like to thank John Williams and Detmar Meurers for their comments on my Ph.D. dissertation. 

Abstract

This article introduces two sophisticated statistical modeling techniques that allow researchers to analyze systematicity, individual variation, and nonlinearity in second language (L2) development. Generalized linear mixed‐effects models can be used to quantify individual variation and examine systematic effects simultaneously, and generalized additive mixed models allow for the examination of systematicity, individuality, and nonlinearity within a single model. Based on a longitudinal learner corpus, this article illustrates the usefulness of these models in the context of L2 accuracy development of English grammatical morphemes. I discuss the strengths of each technique and the ways in which these techniques can benefit L2 acquisition research, further highlighting the importance of accounting for individual variation in modeling L2 development.

Open Practices

Image

This article has been awarded an Open Data badge. All data are publicly accessible via the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/dbuh4. Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science:https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki.

Number of times cited: 7

  • , Signatures of automaticity during practice: Explicit instruction about L1 processing routines can improve L2 grammatical processing, Applied Psycholinguistics, 10.1017/S0142716418000553, 40, 1, (205-234), (2018).
  • , Developmental Trajectories in L2 Writing Strategy Use: A Self‐Regulation Perspective, The Modern Language Journal, 102, 2, (292-309), (2018).
  • , Evidence and Interpretation in Language Learning Research: Opportunities for Collaboration With Computational Linguistics, Language Learning, 67, S1, (66-95), (2017).
  • , Individual developmental trajectories in the L2 acquisition of Spanish spirantization, Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 10.1075/jslp.3.2.03nag, 3, 2, (218-241), (2017).
  • , Chapter 6. Lost in state space?, Complexity Theory and Language Development, 10.1075/lllt.48.07low, (123-141), (2017).
  • , Detecting development of speaking proficiency with a group oral test: A quantitative analysis, Language Testing, 10.1177/0265532218779626, (026553221877962), (2018).
  • , Individual differences in language experience and bilingual autobiographical memory, International Journal of Bilingualism, 10.1177/1367006917728394, (136700691772839), (2017).