The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

EMPIRICAL STUDY

Effects of Task Complexity on L2 Writing Behaviors and Linguistic Complexity

Andrea Révész

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: a.revesz@ucl.ac.uk

University College London

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Andrea Révész, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, Room 623b, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H OAL. E‐mail:

a.revesz@ucl.ac.uk

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 August 2016
Cited by: 3

This study was supported by a grant from Trinity College London. We would like to thank Elaine Boyd, Roger Gilabert, Gareth McCray, and John Rogers for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this article. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful suggestions and the editor, Pavel Trofimovich, for his meticulous and constructive feedback on the manuscript.

Abstract

This study investigated whether task complexity influences second language (L2) writers’ fluency, pausing, and revision behaviors and the cognitive processes underlying these behaviors; whether task complexity affects linguistic complexity of written output; and whether relationships between writing behaviors and linguistic complexity are moderated by task complexity. Participants were 73 advanced L2 writers, who completed simple or complex essay tasks. Task complexity was operationalized as the absence versus presence of content support. Participants’ writing behaviors were recorded via keystroke logging software. Four writers, drawn from groups performing simple and complex tasks, additionally engaged in stimulated recall. Content support was found to lead to less pausing, more revision, and increased linguistic complexity. When content support was absent, more frequent pauses and revisions were associated with less sophisticated lexis. These results, combined with stimulated recall comments, suggest that content support likely reduced processing burden on planning processes, facilitating attention to linguistic encoding.

Open Practices

Image

This article has been awarded an Open Materials badge. All materials are publicly accessible in the IRIS digital repository at http://www.iris-database.org. Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki.

Number of times cited: 3

  • , Chapter 4. Task complexity effects on interaction during a collaborative persuasive writing task, Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics, 10.1075/tblt.10.04gom, (84-109), (2018).
  • , Task Complexity, Cognitive Load, and L1 Speech, Applied Linguistics, 10.1093/applin/amx054, (2018).
  • , Effects of increasing the degree of reasoning and the number of elements on L2 argumentative writing, Language Teaching Research, 10.1177/1362168818761465, (136216881876146), (2018).