The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

EMPIRICAL STUDY

The Development of Sensitivity to Grammatical Violations in American Sign Language: Native Versus Nonnative Signers

Rama Novogrodsky

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: ramanovo@gmail.com

Center for the Study of Communication and the Deaf, Boston University

University of Haifa

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Rama Novogrodsky, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Haifa, 199 Abba Khoushy Ave., Mount Carmel, Haifa, 3498838, Israel. E‐mail:

ramanovo@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
Jon Henner

Center for the Study of Communication and the Deaf, Boston University

University of North Carolina, , Greensboro

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Hoffmeister

Center for the Study of Communication and the Deaf, Boston University

Boston University

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 June 2017
Cited by: 3

We thank Rachel Benedict and Sarah Fish for their help in developing the task and Naomi Caselli for her feedback on an earlier version of the article. We also thank the students, teachers, and staff at the schools where data were collected; without their support and participation, this research would not have been possible. This study was supported by grant number R324A100176. The first and the second authors declare an equal contribution.

Abstract

Factors influencing native and nonnative signers’ syntactic judgment ability in American Sign Language (ASL) were explored for 421 deaf students aged 7;6–18;5. Predictors for syntactic knowledge were chronological age, age of entering a school for the deaf, gender, and additional learning disabilities. Mixed‐effects linear modeling analysis revealed main effects of each predictor and an interaction between signing status and learning disability. The native signers showed typical syntactic development that varied by chronological age, gender, additional learning disabilities, and age of entering a deaf school. In contrast, the syntactic development of nonnative signers was more variable. It was less tightly related to chronological age and more strongly influenced by the age at which they had entered the school where assessment occurred, which was highly related to length of exposure to a sign language.

Number of times cited: 3

  • , Influence of Hearing Loss on Child Behavioral and Home Experiences, American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304498, 108, 8, (1079-1081), (2018).
  • , Recent Issues in the use of Signed Language Assessments for Diagnosis of Language Disorders in Signing Deaf and Hard of Hearing children, The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10.1093/deafed/eny014, (2018).
  • , The Development of American Sign Language–Based Analogical Reasoning in Signing Deaf Children, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0062, (1), (2018).