Volume 54, Issue 11 p. 2686-2697
Original Article

The age of Wolfe Creek meteorite crater (Kandimalal), Western Australia

Timothy T. Barrows,

Corresponding Author

School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522 Australia

Department of Geography, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2UP UK

Corresponding author. E-mail: tim.barrows@uow.edu.auSearch for more papers by this author
John Magee,

Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 0200 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Gifford Miller,

INSTAAR and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 80309 USA

Search for more papers by this author
L. Keith Fifield,

Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 September 2019
Citations: 1

Abstract

Wolfe Creek crater lies in northwestern Australia at the edge of the Great Sandy Desert. Together with Meteor Crater, it is one of the two largest craters on Earth from which meteorite fragments have been recovered. The age of the impact is poorly constrained and unpublished data places the event at about 300,000 years ago. In comparison, Meteor Crater is well constrained by exposure dating. In this paper, we present new ages for Wolfe Creek Crater from exposure dating using the cosmogenic nuclides 10Be and 26Al, together with optically stimulated luminescence ages (OSL) on sand from a site created by the impact. We also present a new topographic survey of the crater using photogrammetry. The exposure ages range from ~86 to 128 ka. The OSL ages indicate that the age of the impact is most likely to be ~120 ka with a maximum age of 137 ka. Considering the geomorphic setting, the most likely age of the crater is 120 ± 9 ka. Last, we review the age of Meteor Crater in Arizona. Changes in production rates and scaling factors since the original dating work revise the impact age to 61.1 ± 4.8 ka, or ~20% older than previously reported.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.