The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Special Section: Educating to Build Bridges

The Influence of Reading Expertise in Mirror‐Letter Perception: Evidence From Beginning and Expert Readers

Jon Andoni Duñabeitia

Corresponding Author

Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL)

Address correspondence to Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), Paseo Mikeletegi 69, 2nd Floor, 20009 Donostia, Spain; e‐mail:

j.dunabeitia@bcbl.eu

Search for more papers by this author
María Dimitropoulou

Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL)

Search for more papers by this author
Manuel Carreiras

Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL)

Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 May 2013
Cited by: 11

ABSTRACT

The visual word recognition system recruits neuronal systems originally developed for object perception which are characterized by orientation insensitivity to mirror reversals. It has been proposed that during reading acquisition beginning readers have to “unlearn” this natural tolerance to mirror reversals in order to efficiently discriminate letters and words. Therefore, it is supposed that this unlearning process takes place in a gradual way and that reading expertise modulates mirror‐letter discrimination. However, to date no supporting evidence for this has been obtained. We present data from an eye‐movement study that investigated the degree of sensitivity to mirror‐letters in a group of beginning readers and a group of expert readers. Participants had to decide which of the two strings presented on a screen corresponded to an auditorily presented word. Visual displays always included the correct target word and one distractor word. Results showed that those distractors that were the same as the target word except for the mirror lateralization of two internal letters attracted participants' attention more than distractors created by replacement of 2 internal letters. Interestingly, the time course of the effects was found to be different for the 2 groups, with beginning readers showing a greater tolerance (decreased sensitivity) to mirror‐letters than expert readers. Implications of these findings are discussed within the framework of preceding evidence showing how reading expertise modulates letter identification.

Number of times cited: 11

  • , Reading, Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, (1-38), (2018).
  • , Reading and Dyslexia: The Functional Coordination Framework, Reading and Dyslexia, 10.1007/978-3-319-90805-2_13, (271-296), (2018).
  • , Mirrors are hard to break: A critical review and behavioral evidence on mirror-image processing in developmental dyslexia, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159, (66), (2017).
  • , Into the Looking Glass: Literacy Acquisition and Mirror Invariance in Preschool and First‐Grade Children, Child Development, 87, 6, (2008-2025), (2016).
  • , Inhibition of the mirror generalization process in reading in school-aged children, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 145, (157), (2016).
  • , Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 4, (234), (2015).
  • , The cost of blocking the mirror generalization process in reading: evidence for the role of inhibitory control in discriminating letters with lateral mirror-image counterparts, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1, (228), (2015).
  • , Timing the impact of literacy on visual processing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 49, (E5233), (2014).
  • , Mirror-image discrimination in the literate brain: a causal role for the left occpitotemporal cortex, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, (2014).
  • , Letters in the forest: global precedence effect disappears for letters but not for non-letters under reading-like conditions, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, (2014).
  • , Educating to Build Bridges, "Mind, Brain, and Education", 7, 2, (101-103), (2013).